The Children Are Dying and the World Is Watching

Speaking Truth in the Face of Genocide, Denial, and the Moral Collapse of Empire

By Jorah Kai

Would you prefer to read this on a simple white background? Click here to read it on Medium.

By Jorah Kai

Table of Contents

Editor’s Note

Abstract: What This Essay Does — and What It Doesn’t

Why This Matters to You

I. The Cost of Silence

II. This Is Not Complicated: It’s a Genocide

III. Franck Magennis and the Legal Case Against Apartheid

IV. Hamas: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?

V. Michael and the Settler-Colonial Blueprint

VI. The Collapse of the Zionist Narrative

VII. A Vision Beyond Apartheid

VIII. Why Is This So Dangerous to Say?

IX. The Blueprint of Genocide and Apartheid: How History Repeats — and How It Ends

X. China and the Global South: Diplomacy of Principle

XI. They Have Friends Everywhere: Youth, Rebellion, and the Collapse of Official Truth

XII. The Time to Speak Is Now

XIII. A Final Call to Action

XIV. Appendix: Controversial Claims, Backed by Evidence

Editor’s Note

The Children Are Dying and the World Is Watching confronts one of the defining moral crises of our time: the unfolding genocide in Gaza and the global systems that sustain it. Written in response to mounting civilian casualties, the collapse of international law, and a growing wave of conscience — both within and beyond Jewish communities — this work is at once personal and political. It traces the atrocities in Palestine and their reverberations across the Western world, where surveillance, censorship, and authoritarianism increasingly mirror the technologies and ideologies forged under occupation.

What began as a journalistic indictment has become an act of comprehensive witness — interweaving legal analysis, historical record, and lived experience with the urgency of moral clarity. This is not comfort reading. It demands not passive sympathy, but active responsibility.

Jewish dissent is not an afterthought — it is at the moral center of this story. Organizations like Jewish Voice for Peace, rabbis and historians, descendants of Holocaust survivors, and former Israeli soldiers have risked careers, community, and safety to speak the truth. As JVP puts it:

“Zionism is not Judaism — it is the betrayal of it.”

This essay draws strength from such voices: Norman Finkelstein, Gabor Maté, Ilan Pappé — and, perhaps most powerfully, Miko Peled. He is not simply an Israeli dissident. He is a former elite combatant in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), the grandson of Avraham Katsnelson (a signatory of Israel’s Declaration of Independence), and the son of General Mattityahu Peled, a key military architect of the 1967 war.

Raised inside the architecture of Zionism, Peled was expected to carry its legacy. But when his thirteen-year-old niece, Smadar, was killed by a Palestinian suicide bomber in 1997, he did something rare in public life: he listened. He met with Palestinian families, studied erased histories, and emerged as one of Zionism’s fiercest critics:

“You don’t get to judge the people you’re helping cage, starve, and bomb — especially not when your taxes are footing the bill.”

Peled’s voice recurs throughout this work — not because of his pedigree, but because of his moral defection from empire. Once called a “prince of Israel,” he now stands unequivocally with Palestine.

This edition follows the Chicago Manual of Style, uses numbered sections for clarity, includes block quotes for emphasis, and offers citations for formal review. It is not easy reading. But it is urgent.

Abstract: What This Essay Does — and What It Doesn’t

This essay is not about hate. It does not erase Jewish history or deny Jewish survival. It does not attack faith or identity. It delivers a direct indictment of Zionism — the nationalist political movement that has underpinned seventy-seven years of apartheid, military occupation, and now, genocide in Gaza.

As Miko Peled, son of one of Israel’s founding generals, puts it:

“Open up the definition of the crime of genocide. Compare that to what has been happening to Palestinians since 1948 — you’ll see, it checks almost every box.”

That recognition comes not only from dissidents but from international legal bodies — from South Africa’s case before the International Court of Justice to the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court. It is echoed by voices of conscience across the globe — including Jewish ones — who remind us that complicity is not a matter of faith, but of silence and power.

This work includes personal reflection. I have dear Jewish friends who find the term “Zionist” fraught — tied to survival, not supremacy. I understand that. But Zionism, as Jewish critics insist, is not Judaism. It is a secular nationalist project with a colonial agenda — what Jewish Voice for Peace calls “an apocalyptic death cult with nuclear weapons.”

This essay is grounded in facts, citations, and law — but also in conscience. It is blunt where it must be, precise where it can be, and unflinching throughout. It does not indulge euphemism or silence. It confronts the logic of dehumanization and the machinery of denial that sustains it.

“God has placed great power in the children of Gaza,” one friend wrote. “They are like crystal balls through which the souls of men are examined.”

This work is not written to persuade those who choose blindness. It is written for those who feel what is happening — and refuse to look away. If that includes you, then come with your heart open. The hard part begins now. And silence is no longer an option.

I. The Cost of Silence

I did not grow up thinking much about Palestine. In Canada, it seemed distant and abstract — a corner of the world framed by Western media as “Israel defending itself,” with Palestinians portrayed as irrational, angry, and collectively suspect. Then came 9/11, the War on Terror, video games where every enemy spoke Arabic, and headlines collapsing an entire region into caricature. I absorbed it. We all did. This ideology was structural, cultural, total — and for my silence, I am ashamed.

I am a children’s author, teacher, journalist, and grandfather — and now I am awake. No one can watch families starve under siege, hospitals bombed, and children buried in rubble, and still pretend this is complicated. I could not.

What radicalized me was grief: imagining my granddaughter Naomi crying from hunger, sick with no medicine, asking for help — and knowing I could do nothing. That helplessness is the unbearable weight every Palestinian parent carries. A settler-colonial state built on ethnic supremacy is trying to erase their people, and it is doing so with Western money.

American jets enforce the siege; British planes conduct spy missions to designate Israeli targets; American vetoes block United Nations aid; Western media spin atrocity into ambiguity — and still, leaders wonder why the world turns away. What was once “security technology” in Palestine is now “border management” in Arizona and Texas: virtual walls of apartheid infrastructure exported. This is not mere surveillance; it is domination. Gaza’s forced starvation, mass detention, and algorithmic dehumanization are blueprints for authoritarianism at home.

Recently, an old French documentary has resurfaced, relevant again for reasons that sting. Marcel Ophuls’ The Sorrow and the Pity shattered the myth of widespread French resistance during Nazi occupation. His film revealed an uncomfortable truth: the French elite largely tolerated and cooperated with the Nazis, while true resistance fighters were mocked, isolated, and feared.

“The French actually were pretty content in many places… resistance fighters were isolated, hated, considered a nuisance… The film never made it to big theaters in Paris. It was soft-banned. Only decades later did it gain fame — outside France.”

This wasn’t just about World War II. It’s about what power protects — and what it suppresses. Today, dissident voices calling out genocide in Gaza are demonized, jailed, and surveilled. Journalists like Asa Winstanley, Richard Medhurst, and activists from Palestine Action face raids under the same logic that once labeled resistance to fascism a nuisance. Collaboration was once wrapped in nationalism; today, it’s draped in diplomacy and “security.”

Matt Bernstein, a Jewish writer and host of A Bit Fruity, described it this way: “The idea that me, a Jew, is somehow safer because a student is getting deported or because a university lost its funding? That’s not safety. That’s fascism.”

He’s right. Authoritarians always cloak their violence in the language of protection. But protection for whom? When the only way to be seen as good is to remain silent in the face of atrocity, that’s not safety. It’s submission.

Yet some voices break the mold, naming crimes with uncompromising clarity. One is Miko Peled. Born into a prominent Israeli military family — his grandfather a signer of Israel’s Declaration of Independence, his father a decorated general — Peled understands deeply what many in the West refuse to confront: resistance is a symptom, not the obscenity; funding annihilation while calling for restraint is moral cowardice; judgment without context is hypocrisy.

Even within the Jewish community, this awakening grows. Gabor Maté, a Holocaust survivor and physician, raised his son to support Israel, but after years of reflection, he confessed: “Everything I had been told was a lie.” His son, journalist Aaron Maté, carries that legacy forward — not out of betrayal, but fidelity to truth.

The horror of this moment is waking up to realize that a hundred years after our grandparents fought the Nazis, fascism is alive again — and this time, it wears our uniform. We didn’t defeat it. We absorbed it. Now, the empire that once vowed ‘never again’ is funding its next genocide.

We no longer have the right to look away.

II. It’s Not Complicated. It’s a Crime

The forbidden word is genocide. Utter it, and you risk dismissal as hysterical, political, or unhinged. But what else describes the deliberate starvation and bombardment of a besieged civilian population? When food convoys are blocked, hospitals leveled, aid workers killed, and children lie in mass graves, it is reality — not metaphor. Yet we’re told, “It’s complicated,” a rhetorical shield disabling thought, compassion, and action. Ta-Nehisi Coates bluntly counters, “Everyone says it’s complicated. But it’s not. Apartheid is wrong. And there’s nothing in history that justifies it.”

Aid as a Weapon

Gaza has endured eighty-seven consecutive days of total blockade — no food, water, medicine, or fuel. This violates international humanitarian law and blatantly defies emergency orders from the International Court of Justice demanding unrestricted aid. In response to mounting pressure — including rare condemnations from France, Canada, and Spain’s formal declaration of genocide — Israel opened a narrow “aid corridor.” What followed was chaos, not relief. Ryan Grim of Breaking Points reports, “Four people were crushed by bags of flour and killed… Initially blamed on Hamas, eyewitnesses and footage show panic, desperation, and bullets.” This was optics, not aid. Starvation wasn’t the issue — the photographs were.

Under the guise of humanitarian relief, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation — linked to U.S. mercenary firms — forces civilians through biometric-scanned corridors patrolled by drones. The system is so dehumanizing, the U.S.-appointed director resigned in protest. Krystal Ball explains, “The guy the U.S. picked to run the program resigned, saying it was too much. That tells you everything.” This is siege warfare rebranded: starvation as strategy, militarized distribution as a smokescreen. Over 18,000 children now face imminent death by malnutrition. Body bags outnumber food trucks. The United Nations declared Gaza the hungriest place on earth. Dimitri Lascaris is explicit: “They’re using starvation to herd people into concentration camps. American mercenaries guard starving civilians. This is Nazi shit.”

Genocide, Legally and Literally

The Genocide Convention defines genocide as inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group in whole or part. Israel, backed by the U.S., U.K., and until recently Germany, meets that threshold. South Africa’s case before the International Court of Justice and the 2025 arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant confirm this legal reality. As Peled states plainly: “If this is not genocide, what is?”

Even Germany, symbolic custodian of Holocaust memory, is wavering. On May 30, 2025, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul announced a formal review of arms exports to Israel, citing violations of international law: “This is about ensuring basic human rights. The sick, the weak, and children are first to die.” The diplomatic aftershocks reveal a moral earthquake: when governments question arms sales and file genocide cases, international consensus emerges from rubble.

Meanwhile, the U.S. vetoes ceasefire resolutions. The U.K. ships weapons. The EU averts its gaze. This isn’t complexity — it’s complicity. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert admits bluntly: “What we’re doing in Gaza now is a war of devastation: indiscriminate, limitless, cruel and criminal killing of civilians… Yes, Israel is committing war crimes.” If even Israel’s former leader acknowledges this truth, what excuse remains?

The Red Line

Genocide doesn’t begin with bombs. It begins with excuses, euphemisms, paperwork, and silence.

But even if we ignore international law, what does our moral compass say? In America, if an active shooter were reported inside a school or hospital, the idea of bombing the entire building would never be considered. The innocent inside would matter. Police and media would wait, evacuate, negotiate. Lives would be spared.

So why is it acceptable for the Israeli military to flatten a hospital in Gaza because Hamas may be hiding in the basement?

Why do we apply one standard of human rights to ourselves, and another — one soaked in blood and indifference — to the people of Palestine? Or Sudan? Or Yemen?

And what happens when even the premise for such violence collapses? Just days ago, a mainstream journalist on Sky News flatly dismissed Israel’s claims of Hamas tunnels under a bombed hospital, citing new photos that showed nothing more than sewer water stains. Their analyst concluded, “What we’re seeing is consistent with water drainage marks. There’s no conclusive evidence of a tunnel.” The justification was not just immoral — it was false.

Miko Peled puts the absurdity in plain terms:

“If you believe it’s okay to bomb a hospital and hurt a child because the devil is in the basement, then that’s one set of values. But I do not believe — even if the devil is there — that it’s okay to harm a single hair on a child’s head.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

This isn’t about military tactics. It’s about moral foundations. A civilization that weighs the life of a child against the specter of “terror” is already lost. Peled exposes what too many refuse to say aloud: genocide is not complicated — it’s a choice.

Silence and Repression

Fear is the currency of silence. In the U.S., repression cloaks itself in national symbols. Student visas revoked, protesters jailed, schools defunded — not in the name of safety, but silence. As Norman Finkelstein sharply observes, “They don’t call you antisemitic because you hate Jews. They call you antisemitic because they hate truth.” To hesitate now is not neutrality — it is betrayal.

III. Franck Magennis and the Legal Case Against Apartheid

“You can’t compare this to apartheid,” people often caution.

But international law demands exactly that comparison — and British human rights barrister Franck Magennis put it to the test.

As former head of the U.K.’s largest civil-service union, Magennis sued the Home Office on behalf of a Palestinian man seeking asylum. This wasn’t an ideological protest — it was a legal case. The claim? That the man faced racial persecution under Israel’s dual legal systems in the occupied West Bank.

Magennis anchored his case in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. He avoided rhetoric. He stuck to statute. And the court agreed.

“Separate laws, movement restrictions, dual systems of justice — these are not opinions; these are facts. These are the elements of apartheid under international law.”
 — Franck Magennis

Sidebar: What Zionism Actually Is

Excerpted from Dan Cohen, The Jimmy Dore Show, November 2023

“Zionism is a pseudo-Messianic, colonial nationalist movement that rebranded Jewish identity into a racialized nation-state project. It is not Judaism — it is the rejection of it.”

Dan Cohen, an independent journalist, traces Zionism not to Jewish spirituality but to 19th-century European nationalism. Its architects — secular Jews like Theodor Herzl — sought political sovereignty modeled on European empires. To justify colonizing Palestine, they retooled long-dormant messianic myths into a secular conquest narrative: a nation without God, armed with prophecy.

“For 2,000 years, rabbis said: no temple, no army, no state — until God wills it. Zionism flipped the script: we’ll build the temple ourselves, summon the Messiah by force, through war.”

That logic, Cohen warns, has culminated in what he calls “an apocalyptic death cult with nuclear weapons.” From Herzl lobbying antisemites like Tsar Nicholas II to help “solve the Jewish problem” by sending Jews to Palestine, to Netanyahu invoking the biblical conquest of Canaan after October 7, Zionism’s logic has always been colonial — and proudly so.

“They don’t believe they’re indigenous to the land. They believe they conquered it. Therefore, it’s theirs.”

Many Orthodox Jews reject Zionism as heresy. Yet today, its secular and religious factions converge on one goal: the forced expulsion of Palestinians and the construction of a supremacist ethnostate. Whether messianic or militarist, the result is the same: apartheid and annihilation.

But this ideology isn’t just spoken — it’s enforced.

Settlers seize Palestinian homes while families shop for groceries, shrugging, “If I don’t steal it, someone else will.” They bulldoze villages, torch ancient olive groves, fire homemade rockets from fortified hilltops, and host barbecues beside the apartheid wall as children starve on the other side. They loot aid convoys, beat farmers, poison livestock, and desecrate mosques and cemeteries — often under the watch or protection of Israeli soldiers.

These aren’t rogue actors. They are the policy.

Under international law — including the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, and dozens of U.N. resolutions — the settlement enterprise is unequivocally illegal. Yet it continues, funded by the state and protected by Western silence.

In a rare but overdue move, the U.K. sanctioned settler leader Daniella Weiss in May 2025 for “promoting and supporting acts of aggression and violence against Palestinian individuals.” If international law is to mean anything, it must apply not only to rockets — but to rooftops built on stolen land.

And now, the system faces global consequence.

In October 2023, South Africa submitted a 5,000-page dossier to the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide. In 2025, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. These are not symbolic gestures — they are formal indictments at the highest level of international law.

What Magennis began in British courts is now rippling through the global legal order.

Some still dismiss “apartheid” as hyperbole. But Magennis proved it is a precise term. South Africa enforced pass laws and forced removals; Israel enforces checkpoints, segregates roads, and grants civil rights based on ethnicity. When pro-Israel lobbyists tried to have him disbarred, Magennis replied simply:

“They didn’t come after me because I lied; they came after me because I told the truth.”

He also dismantled the misuse of antisemitism as a shield for Zionism:

“You can’t fight racism while supporting Zionism.”

A movement rooted in ethno-national supremacy cannot coexist with a genuine anti-racist ethic.

Finally, Magennis exposed the politics behind the “terrorist” label. By today’s standards, Nelson Mandela would have been disqualified from peace talks. And yet Mandela declared:

“Our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”

States often brand the oppressed as terrorists while shielding the crimes of those in power.

Magennis’s victories are more than symbolic. They’re a roadmap. Law, justice, and moral courage demand we name apartheid for what it is — and end it.

IV. Hamas: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?

A Settler-Colonial Legacy

To understand Hamas, we must first understand the world that built it. Not through ideology, but through history — layered with betrayal, occupation, and violence long before 1987.

In 1916, Britain and France signed the Sykes–Picot Agreement, carving the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire into colonial zones — dividing lands they had not yet conquered. To hasten the collapse of Ottoman rule, Britain promised Sharif Hussein of Mecca independence if he led a revolt. He did. The Arabs bled for empire — and were repaid with a knife in the back.

In 1917, the Balfour Declaration pledged Palestine not to its people, but to “a national home for the Jewish people” — without the consent of the Arab majority. This was not diplomacy; it was betrayal. What followed was textbook settler colonialism, refined in Ireland, India, and Kenya: redraw borders, rename cities, suppress resistance, replace the ruled with rulers.

Europe armed, trained, and installed Zionist settlers as imperial proxies to pacify the native population. The racial hierarchy was clear: Europeans on top, Arabs beneath.

By 1947, the United Nations partitioned 55 percent of Palestine for a Jewish minority. Within a year, over 750,000 Palestinians had fled or been expelled. What remains today is not a state, but a fragmented archipelago of occupied zones — disconnected, blockaded, and rationed. Electricity, water, movement, and breath itself are regulated. This is not governance; it is incarceration.

From this crucible of loss and domination emerged Hamas.

Formed during the First Intifada as an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas blended religious identity with social infrastructure — building schools, clinics, and food distribution networks alongside its armed resistance. Over time, it became Gaza’s de facto government — and a movement willing to use violence for political ends.

Whether Hamas is called a terrorist group or a resistance force depends not on morality but on legal frameworks — and political convenience. The U.S., EU, Canada, and Israel designate it a terrorist organization. Many Global South nations — China, South Africa, Iran, Turkey — recognize it as a legitimate resistance group under occupation.

This debate is not new.

Nelson Mandela and the ANC were once labeled terrorists. So were Irish republicans — and Zionist militias like Irgun and Lehi. History is full of the oppressed criminalized by those in power.

Under the Geneva Conventions and multiple U.N. resolutions, peoples under foreign military occupation have the right to resist, including by force — so long as civilians are not deliberately targeted. This is not semantic hairsplitting; it is international law. Without that right, resistance collapses into criminality — and occupation becomes eternal.

Some insist on symmetry, claiming that all sides commit evil and must be equally condemned. But as Israeli dissident Miko Peled reminds us:

“You cannot create symmetry between the oppressor and the oppressed… The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — and that is the apartheid state established by the Zionists in Palestine in 1948.”

We are told to denounce Hamas before we can grieve Gaza’s dead. But we are never asked to denounce Zionism before mourning Israeli lives. This is not justice. It is conditioning.

Peled cuts through the myth:

“There’s no good Zionism. There’s no bad Zionism. There’s Zionism. It’s a racist ideology. It’s an apartheid ideology. It needs to be dismantled.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

This isn’t about Hamas or even Hamas’ actions. It’s about the conditions that guarantee their emergence. Until we dismantle the system that cages a people, we will keep condemning symptoms while funding the disease.

Like the ANC or Irish republicans, Hamas did not arise solely from ideology — it was born from dispossession, humiliation, and the vacuum left by failed diplomacy. If we want fewer rockets, we must dismantle the walls and checkpoints that cage a people.

Louis Theroux’s documentary The Settlers makes this personal. A Texas-born settler casually declares, “Gaza is ours.” Daniella Weiss, self-described “godmother” of the settler movement, boasts, “There will be no option left for a Palestinian state.” This week, the U.K. sanctioned her for inciting violence.

On the ground, settlers steal homes while families shop for groceries, bulldoze villages, torch olive groves, and plant flammable pine trees that feed wildfires. They fire rockets into Palestinian neighborhoods, barbecue beside apartheid walls while children starve, and loot aid convoys with impunity. These are not isolated incidents. Under international law, the entire settlement enterprise is illegal.

And yet, the narrative is reversed. Israel, a nuclear power, secretly funded Hamas for decades — hoping to divide Palestinian factions, sabotage diplomacy, and justify siege. When blowback came, Netanyahu’s government bombed indiscriminately, killing civilians to avoid their capture. Palestinian prisoners are tortured, starved, and raped in Israeli jails — while the media calls those who resist “barbarians.”

“The goal was never to defeat Hamas,” says Shahid Bolsen. “It was to need Hamas — to sabotage diplomacy, provoke violence, and maintain permanent siege.”

Bolsen, often dismissed in Western media as a “radical Islamist,” argues not from morality but structure: resistance was not just inevitable — it was cultivated. The system feeds off Hamas. And the longer it survives, the longer the siege remains justified.

“You cannot understand Hamas,” Bolsen warns, “without understanding the system that benefits from its survival.”

This is not just physical violence. It is narrative warfare.
 The jailers are called civilized. The jailed are called terrorists.

Equating Hamas and the Israeli occupation is like accusing a rape victim and her attacker of equal aggression — it is a moral hallucination.

And yet, in the rubble, a poet speaks.

In 2025, Mosab Abu Toha won the Pulitzer Prize for essays written while mourning his children under Israeli bombardment.

“My poems are not weapons,” he said. “They are windows.”

Through those windows, we see grief — not hatred; truth — not propaganda. To call that humanity “terrorism” is a second erasure.

Understanding Hamas does not require endorsement — but it does require memory. Zionism was born of imperial ambition. So was its resistance. International law demands we distinguish resistance from terror — not to excuse all tactics, but to preserve the fundamental right of the oppressed to struggle for freedom.

Only then can we begin to imagine justice — not for one side, but for all.

The War Was a Deal: How Hamas and Netanyahu Played Chicken With Gaza

If the historical record explains Hamas’s rise, what followed on October 7 may better be understood as strategy — on both sides.

Israeli intelligence saw it coming. Egyptian officials issued repeated warnings. IDF analysts flagged Hamas drills and chatter. Surveillance tech tracked strange movements near the Gaza fence. Yet Netanyahu’s government reportedly reduced guard presence and left border gates vulnerable.

The warnings weren’t missed. They were shelved.

According to Haaretz and Yediot Aharonot, briefings reached the highest levels of government — and were dismissed.

Former IDF officers no longer call it a failure. They call it a trap.

“The war was not a failure. It was a trap.”
 — Anonymous IDF source, Yediot Aharonot, March 2025

And Hamas? They were counting on a slaughter. They needed one. They offered up Gaza as a stage — and thousands of civilians as martyrs in a global spectacle of suffering. Their goal was never to win militarily. It was to provoke such overwhelming brutality that the world could no longer look away.

This was not war. It was Mutually Assured Destruction — not with nuclear weapons, but with narrative gravity.

Each side gambled with lives to secure legitimacy. Each relied on the other’s monstrosity to justify its own.

“Hamas needed a collapse. So did Bibi.”
 — Shahid Bolsen

Hamas got outrage. Netanyahu got obedience. Gaza got the grave.

“This isn’t about religion. It’s about power. And power, unaccountable, always hungers for more.”
 — Jewish Voice for PeaceV. Michael and the Settler-Colonial Blueprint

Michael does not argue; he deflects.

His slogans — “There was no Palestinian people before 1964,” “Anti-Zionism is antisemitism,” “Hamas started it,” “If we don’t cleanse them, they’ll cleanse us” — echo across comment threads and lecture halls. He speaks not to persuade, but to overwhelm. His volume betrays fear: the ideology he defends is collapsing beneath its contradictions.

But Michael is not the cause. He is the echo.

Long before Hamas, or Michael’s tweets, Zionism had its blueprint. In 1896, Theodor Herzl opened Der Judenstaat with fiction:

“A land without a people for a people without a land.”

With these words, Herzl erased over 400,000 Arabs living under Ottoman rule. His diaries brim with plans to “redeem” Palestine through Jewish labor, creating a “New Jew” rooted not in diaspora but in conquest. At the First Zionist Congress (1897), delegates endorsed land purchases from absentee landlords, transactions ending in quiet evictions of Palestinian peasants.

This logic soon hardened into policy. In 1909, David Ben-Gurion warned:

“The country cannot absorb all its children if we do not restrict foreign labour and implant Hebrew labour alone.”

Mandating “Hebrew labour” excluded Arab workers and created a dual economy — Jewish settlers above, indigenous Arabs below. British Mandate policies after 1922 codified inequality: immigration certificates, land trusts, labor quotas — all tools entrenching demographic dominance.

This was not improvisation. It was design.

By 1948, Zionism’s blueprint saw over 750,000 Palestinians expelled or fleeing their razed villages. Return was forbidden. Post-1967 expansions entrenched Ben-Gurion’s vision through zoning laws, segregated roads, and biometric checkpoints.

Historian Franck Magennis’s British court victory underscored apartheid as infrastructure: dual legal systems, racially gated permits — Herzl’s “redemption” made tangible.

The myth of an empty land collapsed decades ago. Ottoman census records, British surveys, and Palestinian memories speak clearly: Palestine was never terra nullius. Historians Ilan Pappé and Rashid Khalidi conclusively document this erasure and displacement.

Sovereignty cannot be declared over a people by fiat. The U.N. Charter, Fourth Geneva Convention, and Security Council resolutions affirm self-determination — including for the occupied.

What Herzl called “redeemed land” became stolen villages. Ben-Gurion’s “Hebrew labour” yielded unemployment, dependency, and restricted movement. These were not unintended consequences — they were the system working exactly as intended.

When Michael shouts slogans, he defends not Israeli security but a nineteenth-century settler ideology aimed at erasure. He is not debating. He is drowning dissent.

His talking points are not controversial — they are camouflage.

Unmasking their origins reveals the truth Michael fears most: Zionism is foundationally colonial, not liberatory. Its language of “security” repackages dispossession as destiny.

Michael is not the argument. He is the alibi.

It’s time we stopped mistaking noise for truth.

VI. The Collapse of the Zionist Narrative

The ground is shifting.
 Protests surge across continents. Politicians who once stood lockstep behind Israel now pause. Media outlets, long fluent in euphemism, fumble for new words. The old refrain — “It’s complicated” — no longer holds. The world watches genocide unfold in real-time. No Holocaust memorials, sacred traumas, or moral exceptionalism can justify starving children and mass graves.

For decades, Israel cloaked itself in Shoah memory, wielding victimhood even as it bombed hospitals. This contradiction — honoring one genocide while perpetrating another — silenced critics as antisemitic or ungrateful. But the shield is cracking. No legal, moral, or spiritual defense justifies racial supremacy, occupation, and mass suffering.

Grief has catalyzed truth.
 Israeli dissident Miko Peled, whose niece died in a suicide bombing, recognized her death not as random violence but as a direct consequence of Israeli policies. The trauma didn’t radicalize him — it awakened him, shattering his faith in Zionism.
 Peled’s indictment is generational. Raised inside the myth, he watched it collapse from within:

“The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — the apartheid state established in 1948.”

Peled joins former insiders whose clarity pierces Israeli exceptionalism’s armor.

The collapse is not rhetorical. It is material and brutal.
 In May 2025, Israel forcibly displaced over 250,000 Palestinians from Gaza’s Jabalia refugee camp under “Gideon’s Chariots,” pushing them into ambiguous “humanitarian zones” amid escalating violence and starvation. Israeli plans seek the occupation of 75% of Gaza, deepening a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

The toll is staggering: over 54,000 Palestinians dead, most women and children; thousands beneath rubble; famine imminent. The ICC issued arrest warrants against Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Gallant for war crimes. Amnesty International, UN rapporteurs, and the ICJ declare genocide imminent.

This is systematic ethnic cleansing.

Even within the halls of empire, alarm bells ring. Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes broke rank on MSNBC:

“Everything I’m hearing from people on the inside is that it is materially worse [in Gaza] over the last few weeks than it has been since October 7th… When people can actually get into Gaza, what they’re going to find there is much, much worse than anything that’s been reported.”

Rhodes speaks softly but clearly: intelligence reports and aid data reveal starvation, silence, mass graves. And still the U.S. gives bombs, not ultimatums. “America has the ultimate leverage,” he admits, “and it’s not being used.”
 This is not diplomacy. It is complicity.

Ta-Nehisi Coates, touring the West Bank, described it as “Jim Crow on steroids.” He demolished Israel’s exceptionalism:

“No country establishes its existence through rights. They establish it through force — as America did. Israel’s existence is fact, not a moral entitlement.”

Aaron Maté deepened this critique:

“No Israeli is asked: ‘Do you accept Palestine’s right to exist?’ Palestine doesn’t exist yet — it’s actively being destroyed.”

This rhetorical imbalance weaponizes the “right to exist” narrative, erasing Palestinian claims and recasting structural violence as defense.

Holocaust scholar Norman Finkelstein condemns memory weaponization:

“The Holocaust industry exists not to honor victims but to deflect criticism.”

Historian Ilan Pappé calls the Nakba “an ongoing structure,” while Chomsky labels Israel “an instrument of imperial power.”

Even empire’s scribes see the cracks. In May 2025, Thomas Friedman quoted former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert:

“What we’re doing in Gaza is a war of extermination — indiscriminate, cruel, criminal.”

Israeli politicians from across the spectrum admit collapse. Friedman reports rising suicides, fractured families, a nation haunted by trauma.

This is not resilience. It is disintegration.
 Louis Theroux’s The Settlers reveals open declarations of entitlement among settlers:

“If we waited for permission, there’d be no Israel.”

This is no longer fringe. It’s state policy — 22 new settlements approved, settler pogroms, child imprisonment.

Analyst Shahid Bolsen succinctly captures this moment:

“Israel isn’t fighting Hamas; it’s fighting reality. Zionism doesn’t do diplomacy — it dominates or disintegrates.”

Bolsen sees a geopolitical shift isolating Israel. The Global South moves on, leaving Zionism surplus.

“This genocide marks the end of Zionist strategy.”

The collapse is tangible: mass military refusals, hundreds of thousands emigrating. Lee Camp summarizes starkly:

“There’s no military doctrine left — just collapse.”

This is the end of the Zionist narrative.
 It is not tragic.
 It is overdue.

VII. A Vision Beyond Apartheid

This is not a call for revenge or a new hierarchy. It is — and always has been — a call for justice.

True justice demands that no one’s safety be built on another’s oppression. Anti-Zionism, at its core, is not about erasing a people, but dismantling a system of domination — one where a single ethnic group controls land, water, laws, and roads, while millions remain trapped behind walls, checkpoints, rubble, and hunger.

As Franck Magennis put it:

“This is not about dismantling people. It’s about dismantling systems.”

Ending Zionism does not mean ending Jewish life in the region. It means ending apartheid: race-based land laws, dual legal systems, bureaucratic cruelty. It means imagining something unprecedented in historic Palestine — a secular democracy from river to sea, where every adult, regardless of religion or ethnicity, holds one equal vote.

In such a democracy, the millions displaced in 1948 and their descendants would finally return home — not just in body, but in dignity. Reparations would be made, not as transactional settlements but as acts of recognition. Education would be shaped by truth rather than myth, offering future generations the full story of their land and each other. And justice would cease to be a weapon wielded by the powerful, instead becoming a path to healing for all who have suffered.

Dr. Gabor Maté reminds us:

“The only way out of trauma is through truth. The way to heal is not to dominate — but to repair.”

Repair begins when justice for Palestinians is no longer framed as a threat to Jewish survival, but as the only path to true security for all.

Miko Peled makes it plain:

“The Palestinians are not the victims. They are the liberators. Because through their resistance, they’re going to liberate all of us from Zionism, and then we can all be free.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

At first glance, this may seem to contradict the unbearable truth: over 14,000 Palestinian children have been killed, and millions starve behind fences. But Peled does not deny their suffering — he honors their agency. His point is not that Palestinians do not suffer, but that they are more than their suffering. To view them only as victims is to reduce them to a humanitarian plea. They are more than that. They are a moral force.

In resisting occupation, Palestinians expose empire. In refusing silence, they force the world to choose. Their struggle, Peled insists, has the power to liberate not just Gaza, but the conscience of the world. That is not pity. That is power.

Liberation, in this vision, is not exclusive. It is collective. Zionism has not only caged Palestinians — it has trapped Jews in a cycle of fear, militarization, and moral erosion. Freedom for one people cannot come at the cost of another. The only path forward is shared.

“Palestine is an entire country… The apartheid regime drew these borders. The reality is one state — an apartheid state — or the only hopeful alternative: a free, democratic Palestine.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

We have a precedent. South Africa chose truth over amnesia, dignity over domination. Its Truth and Reconciliation Commission did not erase anyone; it confronted atrocities, acknowledged pain, and planted seeds for a multiracial democracy. Imperfect, painful, incomplete — but real.

If South Africa could do it, so can Israel-Palestine.
 But only if we reject the lie that safety can be built on another’s grave.
 Only if we choose to believe in something beyond mere survival.

As Archbishop Desmond Tutu warned:

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

The time for neutrality has passed. The vision must now be justice.

VIII. Why Is This So Dangerous to Say? (Revised)

To call the deliberate starvation and bombardment of Gaza “genocide” invites instant censure in much of the West. To call it “apartheid” risks professional ruin. To criticize Zionism — even as a political ideology — can lead to social exile, platform denial, or defunding.

Why? Because Zionism is deeply embedded in American political power. In the 2020 election cycle, pro-Israel interests contributed roughly $3.75 million to Joe Biden and about $894,000 to Donald Trump — signaling a bipartisan consensus that often chills criticism.

AIPAC shapes congressional races with multimillion-dollar campaigns that silence dialogue rather than foster it. College presidents resign for failing to equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism. Peaceful protests are branded terrorism. Textbooks erase Palestine. Celebrities like Sharon Osbourne pose as defenders of tolerance while backing groups that silence survivors and shield war crimes behind the guise of “fighting hate.”

This is not diplomacy; it is ideological enforcement. And it works by fear, not persuasion.

Marcel Ophuls documented this pattern in The Sorrow and the Pity: elite collaboration and public apathy thrive under national security’s cover. Resistance was not honored — it was hated.

“Resistance fighters were isolated… considered a nuisance. The French elite, especially, had no problem with Nazi occupation.”

Today’s pattern repeats. Protesters are labeled extremists; journalists surveilled or deported. British authorities, pressured by Israeli diplomats, have enhanced charges against genocide protesters. Resistance is a nuisance; power demands silence.

Words matter. “Semitic” includes Jews and Arabs. Palestinians are Semitic. A campaign of extermination against them is, by definition, antisemitic. Using “antisemitism” to shield state violence against Semitic people is a moral obscenity.

Worse still, the genocide’s management is so clumsy its architects recoil from it.

Aaron Maté observed after Netanyahu’s statements:

“Starvation was the tipping point — for PR, not humanity.”

Israel fears the image, not the act, of genocide. Officials admitted:

“We can’t have photos of children starving — not starvation itself.” This was image management, not aid.

Canadian human rights lawyer Dimitri Lascaris said:

“What horrifies me is not just the evil, but the stunning incompetence of this genocidal regime. They couldn’t even pick a compliant puppet to run humanitarian aid — he had a conscience and resigned.”

That resignation punctures the myth, revealing collapse as well as cruelty.

But even humanitarianism has been weaponized. In a world where truth is punishable, clarity becomes contraband. To name this genocide is to be called antisemitic, traitorous, or naïve. To demand justice is to be labeled a threat. That’s why so much energy is poured into distraction: into aid convoys, artificial corridors, PR campaigns of mercy, and drone footage of bread trucks.

As Miko Peled makes clear:

“That should not be the conversation — humanitarian aid. The conversation should be the liberation and dismantling of the apartheid state — and of course, dismantling the concentration camp so people are free.”

Humanitarianism without liberation is not compassion. It’s containment.

“It’s not about getting the genocidal regime to allow humanitarian aid to go into a population they want to kill anyway… That only makes things worse.”

Peled is blunt: food trucks won’t free Gaza. They offer moral cover, not moral clarity. This is not relief — it’s ritual. And the more precise the dissent, the harsher the punishment. The real threat to empire isn’t resistance — it’s articulation. To say this aloud is to risk everything. That’s why we must.

By wrapping Israeli violence in Holocaust imagery — flying the Star of David over bombed hospitals, invoking “Never again” to justify siege warfare — Israel collapses Judaism’s moral authority into a militarized ethnonational state. This fuels real antisemitism and endangers Jews worldwide. It is genocidal against Palestinians and antisemitic in the backlash against dissenting Jews.

Holocaust memory is no longer preserved — it is performed, distorted, and weaponized.

At a Toronto fundraiser for the Abraham Global Peace Initiative, Israeli ambassador Gilad Erdan lit candles on a birthday cake and declared, “We will wear yellow stars until you condemn the atrocities of Hamas.” Days later, in an i24 interview, he proclaimed:

“The UN building should be wiped off the face of the earth.”
 (On The Line Media, June 2025)

This wasn’t satire. It was diplomatic theater, desecrating Jewish trauma to rationalize Palestinian annihilation. Erdan didn’t merely invoke genocide — he demanded impunity. The yellow star, meant to mark Jewish victimhood, was twisted into a costume of moral superiority. That he could call for the erasure of the UN while Israel bombed UN schools, warehouses, and shelters — killing hundreds of staff — makes the symbolism not only grotesque, but genocidal.

Across the Global North, the pattern is clear. In the U.K., children are suspended for wearing keffiyehs. In Germany, lectures on Palestinian suffering prompt investigations. In France, pro-Palestinian marches are banned. Criticize Israel, and you become the threat.

And the mechanisms of that enforcement are not limited to governments. Zionist militias now operate with legal protection and charitable status.

As Samira Moyed reports:

“Magen Herut, a vigilante Zionist organization operating on Canadian campuses and protests, takes its name from a Zionist terror group — and it holds charitable status with the Canada Revenue Agency.”
 (On The Line Media, June 2025)

This is not grassroots activism — it is empire outsourced. While Palestinian students are suspended for keffiyehs, Zionist enforcers intimidate protesters under the banner of “community defense.” Their presence mirrors settler logic: surveillance, harassment, and silence. Canadian institutions don’t just ignore this — they endorse it. This is how soft fascism gets subsidized.

This chilling complicity extends into immigration and education. It calls itself a peace initiative — but functions as ideological enforcement.

Moyed continues:

“The Abraham Global Peace Initiative is a Zionist lobby group with charitable status… fronted by a man who uses Holocaust trauma to criminalize dissent. They want a Canadian ‘values test’ requiring immigrants to affirm Israel’s right to exist.”
 (On The Line Media, June 2025)

This isn’t immigration vetting — it’s ideological litmus. To require fealty to an apartheid state as a condition of citizenship turns genocide denial into national identity. It’s not democracy. It’s dogma.

Commencement Censorship and the War on Student Dissent
 In May 2025, Logan Rozos, valedictorian at NYU’s Gallatin School, stood before his graduating class and said what many feel but few are allowed to say:

“I want to say that the genocide currently occurring is supported politically and militarily by the United States, is paid for by our tax dollars, and has been livestreamed to our phones for the past 18 months… I condemn this genocide and complicity in this genocide.”

The audience clapped. Some stood. NYU withheld his diploma.

The school said Rozos had “lied” about his prepared remarks and “abused a privilege.” The Anti-Defamation League praised the punishment. The livestream disappeared.

Two weeks earlier, MIT graduate Megha Vemuri used her commencement to acknowledge Palestinians and their struggle. She quoted Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and affirmed her commitment to justice. MIT cut her mic and issued an apology — not to her, but to donors and attendees who felt “discomfort.”

This is not free speech. This is ideological policing.

Under Donald Trump’s 2025 executive pressure campaign, the U.S. Department of Education began threatening elite institutions like Harvard and Columbia with federal investigations and funding cuts if they failed to suppress anti-Zionist activism. Republican lawmakers echoed the message: equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism, or else. Universities folded. Students were suspended. Police were summoned to shut down tents and voices.

This is not education. It is compliance masquerading as order. It is empire protecting its narrative.

In a country that celebrates dissent when it topples statues overseas, the reality at home is stark: say “Free Palestine,” and you may lose your degree, your job, your bank account. The First Amendment applies — but selectively. The victims of power are not always invited to speak.

In April 2025, a viral TikTok showed Zionist influencer Lizzy Savetsky berating an Arab taxi driver for antisemitism — without cause. Jewish commentator Matt Bernstein explained this is about control, not fear. Victimhood weaponized. When asking to exist is seen as a threat, the goal is obedience, not peace.

Aaron Maté bluntly states:
 “Jews occupy so many powerful positions… it’s embarrassing to say we’re persecuted.”

This challenges how antisemitism is used — not denying it, but exposing its weaponization. When privilege cloaks itself in eternal victimhood, history becomes a tool to silence truth. The result is not safety but impunity.

This is structural, strategic — and sometimes staged.

In 2019, a Winnipeg kosher café reported a violent antisemitic attack that police later revealed was a hoax staged by the owners themselves. False claims weaponize real suffering, corroding trust and delegitimizing genuine cries for justice.

Matt Bernstein’s point stands: when victimhood becomes strategy, it threatens truth itself.

Shahid Bolsen sees through the charade:
 “You’re not censored because you’re wrong. You’re censored because you’re a threat to power.”

The more precise the truth, the harsher the suppression. The West fears losing control of the story that stabilizes empire.

But the silence cracks.

On The Greyzone, Daniel Maté — son of trauma expert Dr. Gabor Maté — pushed back against labeling a 2025 D.C. shooting of Israeli officials as antisemitic:
 “I read the manifesto. I couldn’t find antisemitism. He was upset by the Gaza genocide.”

Journalist Max Blumenthal agreed: conflating a militarized settler state with Jewish identity recasts dissent as hate, stripping context from retaliation.

One victim, Yaron Lischinsky, wasn’t strictly Jewish. A self-identified Christian Zionist, he openly glorified Israeli military violence on social media — a stark reminder that some supporters see prophecy, not policy.

This is not diplomacy. It is death cult politics masquerading as foreign policy. When bombs become blessings, atrocity is salvation. This is annihilation, not strategy.

The bipartisan machinery enabling apartheid and genocide cannot claim moral high ground. It will collapse under its delusions.

We witness not isolated crises, but empire’s unraveling.

Yet, amid despair, voices rise.

In May 2025, over 300 UK cultural figures — including Dua Lipa, Benedict Cumberbatch, Riz Ahmed, and Tilda Swinton — signed a letter demanding an end to arms sales to Israel.
 “You can’t call it intolerable and keep sending arms.”

When pop royalty adopts genocide’s legal language, rupture is real.

Educators prepare for reckoning.

British Muslim sociologist Dr. Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui vowed:
 “One day, I’ll teach Nazism and Zionism together. Students will ask how the world stayed silent with video evidence.”
 She ends with a challenge:
 “Are you one of them?”

The truth endures.

Over 14,000 Palestinian children have died in Gaza since October 2023 — more than in all other global conflicts combined. Gaza has the highest per capita child amputee rate worldwide. Over 100 journalists, mostly Palestinian, have died. Hospitals lie in ruins. Aid workers lie buried.

In the West, losing a job is tragedy; in Gaza, losing a child to an airstrike is daily horror. Yet the former is weaponized to silence outrage over the latter.

Miko Peled said it plainly:
 “You don’t get to judge the people you’re helping cage, starve, and bomb — especially when your taxes pay for it.”

This is dangerous not because it’s false, but because it is true.

Once people grasp that Zionism does not shield but generates violence, they ask harder questions. They see their own cities, police, and surveillance mirrored in Palestine.

Malcolm X saw it in 1964:
 “The Palestinian struggle is not just a cry for justice — it’s a blistering battle for the most fundamental human rights… If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the oppressors.”

The Palestinian struggle is no exception. It is the mirror.

Ta-Nehisi Coates put it simply:
 “I’ve never felt racism’s glare more intensely than in Israel. Once you see the system — violence disguised as order, humanity erased — you can never unsee it.”

The Comment Section Is the Crime Scene

How Genocide Is Normalized in Plain Sight

It doesn’t start with bombs. It starts with a comment.

Not from politicians or soldiers, but everyday people — anonymous avatars, coworkers, neighbors.

A woman named Katalina says calling Zionism “colonization” is like accusing someone of “trespassing on their own front porch.” A man named Gee Miller replies to a plea for Palestinian rights:
 “It’s time to disappear them from the neighborhood. Simple, like you. Did I type slow enough for you?”

This is not satire. Not fringe. Not rare. This is the banal, unfiltered voice of genocide, thriving in plain sight.

Genocidal systems rely on myths — and myths need messengers. The comment section is full of them:

• Erasure as fact: “There never was a Palestine.”
• Elimination as defense: “Just level Gaza.”
• Victimhood as shield: “How dare you compare this to the Holocaust.”
• Gaslighting as logic: “If Israel wanted genocide, there’d be no Gazans left.”
• Dehumanization as humor: “Let them live in tents. That’s what they’re used to.”
• Dissent as threat: “If you support Palestine, you support terrorism.”

This is how supremacy hides in plain sight — calling you hateful for defending the oppressed, while demanding impunity for the oppressor.

And it works. It silences the fearful, smears dissenters, and rebrands genocide as “self-defense.”

But these comments are not noise. They are evidence.

When history asks how this happened, the answer will be here — in the threads, hashtags, mockery, and silence.

We save these screenshots not to argue, but to remember. Not as anomalies, but as mirrors. In that reflection, we see a society that would rather mock the dying than admit its silence helped kill them.

IX. The Blueprint of Genocide and Apartheid: How History Repeats — and How It Ends

We are told: “Never again.” Yet again, it happens. Weapons change. Borders shift. Bodies pile up — and the world feigns surprise.

Genocide doesn’t begin with bombs. It begins with excuses, euphemisms, paperwork, and silence.

Earlier, we traced how European powers fractured the Arab world and installed Zionism — not as justice but as leverage. Now we zoom out. The violence in Gaza is no anomaly. It is the latest expression of a global pattern.

What if the real problem is not simply that genocide recurs — but that we have built a world where it is allowed?

Every genocide begins with a story of necessity, a pretext of self-defense. Victims become threats.

In 1939, Adolf Hitler infamously asked, “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” It wasn’t a question, but a signal — a warning that silence grants permission and impunity invites repetition.

Raphael Lemkin, the Polish lawyer who coined “genocide,” was obsessed with this. “I became interested in genocide because it has happened so many times — and the criminals guilty of it were not punished.” Lemkin knew impunity is genocide’s oxygen.

The blueprint spans continents and centuries:

The Americas’ Doctrine of Discovery justified extermination under settler colonialism. Thanksgiving mythology masked massacres; treaties became dispossession tools. African lives were commodified and enslaved, fortifying empires on racial capitalism. Nazi Germany refined this logic, praising America’s conquest of Indigenous nations and seeing silence over Armenian genocide as license. In 1948, Zionist militias expelled over 750,000 Palestinians — not a side effect, but design.

Holocaust survivor Primo Levi warned, “Everyone has their Jews. For the Israelis, they are the Palestinians.” This was not betrayal of memory but replication of oppression on new people.

Today, the logic repeats. Over 60% of Gaza’s Palestinians lack legal documents proving ownership. Israeli airstrikes obliterated the Palestinian Land Authority office — erasing cadastral data, maps, title deeds.

As TRT World notes, “The widespread loss of homes, boundaries, and official records makes it nearly impossible for Palestinians to prove ownership — and easier for Israel to annex what remains.”

Genocide doesn’t always announce itself with bombs. Sometimes it arrives via bureaucracy.

First they flatten your home. Then they erase your right to it. Legal erasure follows physical. This is not postwar cleanup — it is a digital Nakba unfolding before the world.

South African apartheid mirrored this: race laws, segregated economies, movement controls. Nelson Mandela declared, “Our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” Archbishop Desmond Tutu said, “The parallels to my own South Africa are painfully stark.”

Rwanda’s genocide killed nearly a million Tutsis in 100 days while leaders hesitated to say “genocide” until rivers ran red. In Darfur, villages burned, women raped, civilians erased amid indifferent press releases.

Mukesh Kapila grimly noted, “The only difference between Rwanda and Darfur now is the numbers.”

These atrocities are not disconnected but part of a system, a cycle. It always begins the same way: a people framed as a problem; their destruction reframed as stability.

Then come the permits. The walls. The graves.

Genocide follows a blueprint — wrapped in euphemism, justified as “order.” Even resistance is rewritten.

Marcel Ophuls, in The Sorrow and the Pity, shattered myths of heroic resistance in Vichy France: “Resistance fighters were isolated. They were hated. They were a nuisance. The French elite had no problem with Nazi occupation.”

This could describe the Global North today.

In London, Paris, Berlin, Washington, those exposing genocide’s machinery are smeared, investigated, arrested. Collaborators thrive; resisters suffer. “National security” masks annihilation logic.

Miko Peled, who has lived both sides, makes it simple: “Open the definition of genocide. Compare it to what Palestinians have faced since 1948 — you’ll see it checks almost every box.”

Why won’t the West name it? Because doing so would force reckoning — not only with Israel, but the system that armed, funded, and defended it.

Norman Finkelstein was among the first to say the quiet part aloud: “For a hermetically sealed population, that’s a genocide.” When Israeli Defense Minister Gallant announced, “No food, fuel, water or electricity,” he wasn’t issuing policy — he was declaring extermination. That’s not war. That’s intent.

Finkelstein explained the strategy clearly: “The goal of Israel was to solve the Gaza question through three methods: ethnic cleansing, making Gaza unlivable, and mass death and destruction.”

This isn’t speculative. It’s logistical. The destruction of 90% of Gaza’s housing, half its hospitals, and half its farmland is not random — it’s design.

And his final warning, perhaps the most chilling: “It’s the final stage of the final solution.”

These are not careless words. Finkelstein, son of Holocaust survivors, doesn’t deal in metaphor. He’s sounding the alarm. And still, many remain silent.

He warns further: “The Holocaust has become an industry — not to honor the dead, but to deflect criticism of the powerful.”

Comedian Lee Camp strips it bare: “The system we live under doesn’t just allow genocide — it funds it, supplies it, and then sends aid to hide the evidence.”

Genocide isn’t a glitch — it’s a feature. Not a system failure, but the system itself.

Here Shahid Bolsen’s analysis cuts deep. Labeled “radical” to discredit him, Bolsen doesn’t plead to law or morality — he exposes the operating system.

Zionism, he says, isn’t unique but instructive: empire sustains itself by endless expansion. When expansion fails, panic ensues.

“The system that created Zionism never had an off switch. It was designed to expand. When expansion becomes impossible, they start burning everything.”

His conclusion: “Genocide isn’t a glitch — it’s a feature. It’s not a failure of the system. It is the system.”

Why did the Holocaust lead to a state, while Indigenous genocide, African enslavement, and the Armenian massacre did not? Because power chooses legacies.

Palestinians got a flag without land, a vote without borders, and a “peace process” designed to stall.

Today’s genocide may lack gas chambers — it looks like checkpoints, starvation, rubble, and red tape.

My granddaughter Naomi was born in China. She will never grow up under a colonial flag. No foreign power will redraw her rivers or rename her borders.

China was carved, humiliated, nearly erased — but refused to die. Now she inherits sovereignty: imperfect, but self-determined.

Let her be strong but kind, rooted in memory, not vengeance.

Let her walk a world no longer ruled by old victors whose “history” was empire’s story.

If those empires tremble, let them.

Because this time, history is not ending.

It is being rewritten.

And maybe Naomi will help write the next chapter.

X. China and the Global South: Diplomacy of Principle

To grasp today’s international diplomacy, we must confront the chasm between the United Nations’ ideals and the imperial machinery that undermines them. In the General Assembly — where all 193 member states vote — Palestine gained “non-member observer state” status in 2012 by 138 to 9. Resolutions condemning Israel’s Gaza siege and calling for humanitarian pauses routinely pass with over 150 votes.

Yet in the Security Council, where five permanent members hold veto power, a single “no” halts global will. Since 2009, the United States alone has vetoed more than twenty resolutions blocking cease-fires, human rights probes, and ICC referrals. Consensus bows to the interests of the few.

In this justice vacuum, China and the Global South offer a counter-vision — not empire, but principle. In January 2024, China formally recognized Palestine. By October, it hosted the Beijing Declaration, convening fourteen Palestinian factions — including Hamas and Fatah — for the first time in years. This was no symbolic gesture; it openly rejected Western “strategic ambiguity” and affirmed that negotiation must include all parties, not just Washington’s picks.

China’s rhetoric has sometimes matched action. Citing the Geneva Conventions, its Foreign Ministry affirmed:

“Civilians should never be targeted, and humanitarian access must never be denied.”

It pledged over $70 million in emergency Gaza aid and pushed the UN for independent war crimes investigations. Beijing stresses not just relief but international law — insisting occupation and apartheid do not grant immunity.

Yet aid and empire wear many faces.

While sending food and medicine, China’s state-owned Adama supports Israeli settlers with agricultural tech and scholarships. The company has supplied herbicides to military contractors and backed illegal settlement trials. Chinese firms build infrastructure in Beit El and Hebron — propping up occupation machinery. These contradictions are not mistakes. They are policy.

In March 2025, Shanghai International Port Group received approval to double Haifa’s Bay Port capacity — just 1.8 km from Israel’s naval base. Western intelligence flagged surveillance risks and strategic sabotage potential. Once a trade hub, the port now sits at espionage’s crossroads.

China’s diplomacy is neither pure resistance nor pure opportunism. It is hybrid power politics — what economist Richard Wolff calls “faster-growing than any seen before.” Its rise challenges U.S. hegemony and tests whether moral clarity can survive entanglement with economic ambition.

Voices cut through the complexity with moral clarity.

Miko Peled states plainly:

“The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — the apartheid state founded by Zionists in 1948.”

Peled does not ask the oppressed to disarm, but the world to stop defending their oppressors.

Dimitri Lascaris warns:

“They want Israel to complete genocide. Losing this region means losing Western hegemony. Gaza is the frontline of that war.”

Shahid Bolsen, labeled radical for rejecting empire’s lines, says Gaza is no mere tragedy — it’s a template:

“The West cannot allow Israel to lose because it would symbolize their strategic model’s collapse. Israel isn’t rogue; it’s a prototype. What’s tested on Palestinians is meant for export.”

Surveillance, crowd control, drone warfare, predictive policing — all refined in Gaza, deployed worldwide. Ignoring these insights because they breach discourse rules is playing empire’s game.

Bolsen reminds us:

“Genocide is enforced not only by bombs but by epistemic control — narrowing speech, criminalizing knowledge.”

Gaza is a message, not just a massacre.

And while many in the Global South speak, only Yemen acts.

Rooted in Shia resistance theology and a legacy of anti-imperial defiance, the Houthi-led Ansar Allah movement has long viewed Palestinian liberation as inseparable from their own struggle against foreign domination.

South Africa sued for genocide. Brazil delivered speeches. Indonesia condemned crimes against humanity. India walked a careful line. But Yemen — bombed, besieged, and branded a pariah — launched missiles, closed Ben Gurion Airport, halted container ships from docking at Haifa, and declared Israeli flight paths into Yemen to be target zones. The poorest country in the region, long dismissed as a Houthi-held wasteland, has disrupted the military and commercial heartbeat of a nuclear power.

In a televised address, Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi condemned the slaughter of Gaza’s children and excoriated the Arab world’s silence, declaring:

“Their inaction is emboldening the Israeli regime to commit further atrocities without any fear of consequence.”

This is not merely warfare. It is a rebellion of conscience.

Yemen’s defiance has turned genocide into a regional crisis — and exposed how those with the most to lose are doing the least, while those with nothing left to lose fire rockets at empire. While diplomats tweet, the Houthis blockade. While kings shake hands, plucky rebels in sandals make Israel’s skies unsafe.

If resistance were measured in cost, Yemen would be rich.

XI. They Have Friends Everywhere: Youth, Rebellion, and the Collapse of Official Truth

“You don’t need all of them. Just enough to shake the ground.” — Andor

The empire crumbles — not from the top, but beneath — in streets, campuses, glowing screens. In Gaza, children die. On campuses, tents rise. Protesters chant dignity, not revenge.

From Minnesota to Malaysia, internet-born youth are connected and clear-eyed.

When 19-year-old Gazan TikTok vlogger Mohammad “Medo” Halimy died in an Israeli strike, 40,000 mourned online. His videos — planting mint in a refugee camp, sharing jokes under drones — reached millions.

“Planting is resistance… They take life, I bring it to earth,” he said.

The University of Minnesota renamed a building Halimy Hall — public, youthful, defiant remembrance. It says what legacy media won’t: Gaza’s children are not statistics, but friends, heroes, seeds.

A protest slogan declares:

“If you bomb a watermelon, you disperse its seeds.”

This is memory alive.

The rebellion’s broadcast is TikTok, not CNN.

Where politicians equivocate, youth speak clearly:

“This is not about Hamas. This is about protecting Palestinian lives.”

Where media softens truth, they name it:

“There is only one side to genocide.”

Where universities punish them, they persist:

“Students risk futures to defend Palestinian rights, believing they stand on history’s right side.”

They march for conscience, not clout.

A UK student said after a Gaza walkout:

“It shattered my understanding of democracy and free speech.”

Another wrote in The Guardian:

“These activists are the conscience sadly missing in their president.”

The generational divide is a rupture. While elders prop apartheid with lobby cash and talking points, youth see through the veil. They don’t watch the war on MSNBC; they stream it live — raw and unedited — from Gazan phones.

Protest signs clarify:

“We are NOT an ISLAMIST MOB. We are people of all faiths and none calling for PEACE.”

They cosplay resistance — some as Stormtroopers mocking empire logic, others flashing Hunger Games’ three-finger salute. They splice Star Wars clips with drone strikes on Alderaan and real Rafah footage.

Satire signals. Dystopia diagnoses.

They’re not confused — just young and clear: a world funding genocide, silencing dissent; a democracy ignoring 80% of its voters; a media humanizing Israeli victims while Palestinians remain faceless.

They’ve stopped waiting for permission.

Doing what elders fail to do — showing empathy and courage amid mass suffering.

And not all resistance roars. Some resistance laughs.

In Mo, the Netflix comedy by Palestinian-American Mo Amer, rebellion comes with a Texas drawl and a refugee ID. Mo doesn’t write slogans — he writes survival. He queues for asylum, smokes weed to manage anxiety, and tries to hold his family together after displacement.

“When people hear the word ‘Palestinian,’ I want them to think of me. Not a terrorist. Not a victim. Just… a guy. A refugee with anxiety.” — Mo Amer

His sitcom isn’t a sermon — it’s insurgency through intimacy. By existing onscreen as funny, flawed, and human, Mo undermines decades of dehumanization. While Yemen fires rockets and students raise banners, Mo fights with punchlines. His presence is protest. His joy is subversion. This, too, is how truth survives.

Not all rebels come from refugee camps or protest tents. Some wear imperial uniforms and carry blasters — on screen. But off screen, they raise their voices against empire in real life.

“We’re being asked by Palestinian people to speak… Women standing on rubble with their arms outstretched saying: ‘Please, please speak up.’ So I’m doing what they’re asking me to do.”

— Denise Gough, BreakThrough News, June 2025

Denise Gough — best known as the icy enforcer Dedra Meero in Andor — isn’t just playing rebellion on TV. Off camera, she is living it. After October 7, she dove into the history of Palestine: reading, watching, and learning with discipline and grief. She cited Voices from Gaza, Ambulance, We Are Not Numbers, and works by Edward Said and Gabor Maté as part of her ongoing study.

“I don’t have kids, so in 20 years it won’t be them asking me what I did. It will be me — looking at myself in the mirror.”

Gough didn’t pretend to have the answers. She spoke of fear. Anxiety. Of being overwhelmed. But also of responsibility:

“We were asked by people of color during the Black Lives Matter protests to educate ourselves — and we did. Now Palestinians are asking the same.”

Her rebellion is personal and public. She calls on fellow artists to risk being shut out by the “gang” of the industry to find their “tribe.”

She reminds us: speak even if your voice shakes.

And in doing so, she becomes another kind of rebel — not one who bombs star destroyers, but one who refuses to let silence be complicity.

And then there’s Greta.

In May 2025, the first flotilla she supported — the Conscience — was bombed by Israeli drones in international waters, halting its mission. But Greta Thunberg is not easily deterred. On June 1, she boarded a second humanitarian aid ship, the Madleen, bound again for Gaza. This time, she sailed herself.

Wrapped in a keffiyeh and flanked by doctors, artists, and lawmakers from Europe, Brazil, and the Middle East, Greta defied both a naval blockade and a global gaslight. She wasn’t there to perform — she was there because leaders failed.

“The world cannot be silent bystanders. This silence and passivity that we are seeing from most of the world is deadly,” she said.
 “We are seeing a systematic starvation of two million people. Every single one of us has a moral obligation to do everything we can to fight for a free Palestine.”

Critics didn’t just disagree — they spat bile.
 A Sky News Australia host called her “the big loser of the week.”
 A guest sneered: “Let’s hope it’s a one-way voyage.”

But Greta didn’t flinch. She boarded anyway.

“I’m not doing this because I’m brave,” she said.
 “I’m doing this because I can’t stand by while others are starved, bombed, and erased. If that makes me dangerous, so be it.”

That’s not just a quote.
 That’s a battering ram against indifference.

Because climate justice without Palestinian justice is incomplete.
 Her rebellion is not theoretical. It’s urgent. And contagious.

And now, they’re crashing the stage. In May 2025, Senator Chuck Schumer’s book signing at the New York Public Library erupted into protest. One by one, demonstrators rose from the crowd. “There’s no debate in genocide!” a young man shouted before being dragged out by security. Another called Schumer a “genocidal monster” with “Palestinian blood on your hands.” Others yelled, “Zionism is not Judaism!” and “Shame on you!” — a chorus of moral fury too raw for press releases. This wasn’t heckling; it was reckoning. The line between performative politics and real resistance collapsed in real time. As elders signed books, the youth signed their defiance.

And now, a new ledger emerges. Across 118 countries, over 18,000 people signed the Anti-Genocide Pledge in a single week — an effort launched by Palestinian youth to record, not merely resist, history. “The anti-genocide pledge is how we are writing our own history,” said Rua Daas of the Palestinian Youth Movement. “This moment is an ultimatum. You are either with genocide, or against it.” While states stall, young people document. While governments delay, the masses decide. The pledge is not just a protest — it is a moral census, a record of who stood where when the world was burning.

“Thank you for not forgetting us,” Gazans write to students.

The reply:

We won’t.

Because they have friends everywhere.

XII. The Time to Speak Is Now

Fear is the currency of silence. People tremble at being labeled antisemitic, fired, or accused of supporting Hamas. Others fear being shouted down, ostracized, or canceled. Yet every second of silence empowers the oppressor. Every hesitation chooses to ignore genocide.

Take Mahmoud Khalil — Columbia graduate and Palestinian activist. For speaking truth about U.S.-funded war crimes, the Trump administration tried to deport him. A federal judge in New Jersey blocked it, ruling:
 “Arguments that Khalil represents a threat to national security and foreign policy are not likely to hold up.”
 This was not just legal rebuke; it was a warning. Governments once fearful of protests now deport peace advocates. Silence remains complicit.

During Vietnam, students marched. Today, they’re surveilled and expelled. We cannot wait for another “Napalm Girl” moment to awaken us. The time to act is now.

Attempts to discredit Franck Magennis, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappé, Gabor Maté, and Noam Chomsky have failed. Yet Irish rap trio Kneecap faces terrorism charges for waving a Palestinian flag. Ironically, Sinn Féin and the IRA — once “terrorists” — now lead Ireland. Labels shift; power remains.

When children’s entertainer Ms. Rachel lamented, “When it’s controversial to advocate for children killed in the thousands… we have lost our way,” the New York Times responded with a hit piece. Compassion is not controversial. This is complicity.

Comedian Matt Lieb described Zionist logic:
 “Lizzie Sevetsky antagonizes a Palestinian on the street, then claims she feels ‘unsafe’ — she’s the aggressor living in an inverted reality, shouting yet claiming victimhood.”
 Cry wolf, shoot first, blame the children.

Sevetsky claims calls to stop killing children make her “unsafe” on campus, while every Palestinian university lies in rubble. The empire cheers her on, then deports Palestinian students for speaking out — while empowering Elon Musk, a ketamine-addicted billionaire who shares Nazi memes and oversaw deep public service cuts under Trump.

Let that sink in: a government branding peaceful protesters terrorists also works with a ketamine-addled man shrugging off Nazi symbolism, trusting him with budget policy — while punishing student activists.

This isn’t about fighting hate; it’s about control. Antisemitism is a branding tool, a weapon to crush dissent, a moral panic masking genocide. What they fear isn’t hatred but accountability.

Israeli journalist Lee Caspi writes:
 “We’re punished for helping people living through unimaginable conditions. As a mother to a 10-month-old, I carry shame over what my country is doing to children just an hour from Tel Aviv.”

Meanwhile, a Middle East Eye investigation revealed Israel’s bombing campaign emits more carbon annually than 100 countries combined. This is not only genocide — it is ecocide.

Remember Hind Rajab. Six years old. Trapped in Gaza City in a car surrounded by tanks. Her cousins and uncle dead. She whispered into a phone, “Come get me. I’m scared.”
 The ambulance trying to rescue her was shelled twice. Days later, her body was found charred, riddled with over 300 bullet holes. This was methodical murder. The world looked away.

Yet truth bleeds through.

In May 2025, Channel 4 News reported over 100 Israeli reservists refusing Gaza service. One, Yamil, after 270 days, confessed:
 “Unarmed people were shot because their lives didn’t matter. We refused to risk ourselves.”
 He called the campaign illegal, immoral, genocidal.

TRT World and the Associated Press exposed Palestinians used as human shields. Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced for 17 days to walk ahead of soldiers with a camera strapped to his head — “Do this or we’ll kill you.” The Israeli army called this the “mosquito protocol.” Palestinians were “wasps.”

These are not errors. They are policy.

But Hind’s whisper sparked rebellion. Macklemore’s “Hind’s Hall” became an anthem:
 “You can bury us, but we are seeds.”
 That line blossomed across campuses and streets. When Kneecap returned after arrest, 20,000 roared: “Free Palestine.” Movements and songs cannot be jailed or silenced.

On May 29, 2025 — day 600 of Israel’s Gaza war — protesters stormed Likud headquarters demanding cease-fire and hostages’ return:
 “There’s a deal waiting. We just need a push. We pray we don’t reach day 700.”

What was called defense now looks like political self-preservation.

If you feel no sorrow for Hind, your empathy has died. If you excuse bombing ambulances, you forfeit your claim to justice.

Dr. Gabor Maté, trauma specialist, wrote:
 “I cried daily for two weeks after visiting Gaza. The world stood by and let it happen. ‘Never again’ means never again for anyone — not a slogan but a burden.”

This is not about sides but lines — between truth and silence, complicity and resistance. Speaking is terrifying. Speak anyway. Each act of defiance chips away at tyranny.

Lee Camp sums it:
 “Calling out genocide gets you fired, funding genocide gets you reelected.”
 The silence is manufactured. The lie deliberate.
 “If the empire wasn’t lying, it would collapse.”

Tony Gilroy, Andor showrunner, warns:
 “Fascism destroys not just the oppressed, but those who built it.”
 We rave about Andor Season 2. Season 3 is already here — in our streets, screens, and silences.

This is not fiction. This is rebellion.

It has begun.

The question is: Which side are you on?

XIII. A Final Call to Action

“When the ‘Napalm Girl’ photo shocked the world in 1972, it became a catalyst — a symbol of a war losing moral ground.”
 — Jehad Abusalim, Zeteo, May 27, 2025

“In Gaza, there are dozens of ‘Napalm Girl’ moments daily — live, unfiltered, haunting.”
 — Jehad Abusalim

We have borne witness here. Named the crime — genocide, apartheid, complicity — traced it from Herzl’s myth to Gaza’s burning children. Exposed slogans as settler-colonial dogma. Followed ethnic cleansing’s blueprint. Shown that international law demands resistance.

Yet the world hesitates.

This is Gaza’s Napalm Girl moment. But unlike 1972, the image is relentless, arriving via livestreams, message threads, raw testimony. It haunts feeds, classrooms, tables. The question is not if we’ve seen enough, but will we act now?

What Must Be Done:

• Demand an immediate, permanent cease-fire. Call and write representatives. Refuse to bankroll war crimes. End blank checks arming apartheid.
• Open humanitarian corridors. Support vetted aid groups. Pressure international bodies to guarantee safe passage for wounded and displaced.
• Amplify Palestinian voices. Share poems, footage, testimony. Elevate journalists and artists risking all. As Pulitzer winner Mosab Abu Toha writes,
   “They kill our children and destroy our homes — and we write poems about it.”
• Expose complicity at home. Investigate how surveillance firms, weapons makers, and tech giants profit from occupation. Host teach-ins, forums, town halls. Make the invisible visible. Lee Camp warns,
   “You don’t live in a country with a mainstream media — you live in one with six corporations funded by war profiteers.”
• Stand in solidarity with all justice struggles. Gaza is not isolated. Its echoes resonate in detention centers, checkpoints, stolen lands. You cannot oppose colonialism abroad while ignoring violence and broken treaties at home.

If one photo ended a war, Gaza’s endless livestreams must shake this one’s foundations.

We’ve named the horror, unraveled the myth, heard the children.

Now, speak — clearly, loudly, relentlessly — until Gaza’s children, like Kim Phuc before them, can say:
 “The world heard us. And it changed.”

“Silence is not neutral. It is participation.”
 — Miko Peled

XIV. Appendix: Controversial Claims, Backed by Evidence

This essay makes several claims that may challenge assumptions or unsettle comfort. Each rests on verifiable facts, legal precedent, and testimony from respected scholars and human rights experts. Below are five of the most contested claims — and why we stand by them.

1. “Israel is committing genocide.” The United Nations Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction — including starvation, mass displacement, and bombing of bakeries, hospitals, and schools — meets this threshold. As of mid-2024, over 14,000 Palestinian children had been killed in Gaza. Water systems were targeted, hospitals leveled, famine continues. In June 2025, Israel approved the largest-ever West Bank settlement expansion and passed laws sentencing Palestinian minors as young as twelve to life imprisonment. This is not occupation; it is a calculated campaign of racial elimination. UN Special Rapporteurs, former ICC prosecutors, and legal scholars — including Rome Statute drafters — affirm Israel’s actions meet genocide criteria. The International Court of Justice is adjudicating South Africa’s case against Israel under the Genocide Convention. In 2025, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. “Israel is not defending itself. Israel is committing genocide. I know because I was raised to believe the opposite — and I served in that army.” — Miko Peled, The General’s Son
2. “Zionism is not Judaism.” Zionism is a political ideology rooted in 19th-century European nationalism. Judaism is a 3,000-year-old faith and culture. They are not synonymous. Many Jews — religious and secular — have long opposed Zionism on ethical or theological grounds. Conflating Zionism with Judaism erases dissent, flattens Jewish identity, and weaponizes faith to shield state violence. “To equate Zionism with Judaism is to slander Judaism. Zionism is a political ideology built on racism and dispossession. It is the very antithesis of the Jewish values I was raised with.” — Miko Peled
3. “Israel has weaponized Holocaust memory to deflect criticism.” This is not Holocaust denial but a critique of trauma’s political misuse. Scholars like Norman Finkelstein and Ilan Pappé document how Holocaust memory silences dissent and shields Israel from accountability. “Using the Holocaust to justify Israel’s crimes is like using 9/11 to justify torture. It dishonors victims and empowers perpetrators.” — Miko Peled True remembrance demands vigilance, not exceptionalism.
4. “Palestinians have a legal right to resist occupation.” International law — including the Geneva Conventions and UN resolutions — recognizes the right of occupied peoples to resist, including armed struggle, provided civilians are not intentionally targeted. While many Western governments label Hamas terrorist, states like China, Russia, Turkey, Iran, and South Africa do not. The Rome Statute affirms resistance against military occupation is distinct from terrorism. Palestinians, under decades of foreign domination, retain the legal right to resist erasure.
5. “The United States and United Kingdom are complicit in war crimes.” Complicity under international law requires material support and knowledge, not shared intent. The U.S. provides over $3 billion annually in military aid to Israel, vetoes most UN cease-fire and investigation resolutions, and supplies weapons and intelligence used against civilians. The U.K. exports fighter jet components and shares surveillance data, aware of their use. In early 2025, a UN Special Rapporteur called Israel’s starvation blockade “genocide by attrition.” By enabling it, the U.S. and U.K. are not bystanders — they are accessories.
6. “Zionist vigilante groups in Canada operate with state protection and charitable status.” In June 2025, investigative journalist Samira Moyed reported on the activities of Magen Herut, a Canadian-based Zionist vigilante organization. The group has been repeatedly observed surveilling pro-Palestinian demonstrators and impersonating police officers on the University of Toronto campus. Its director, Aaron Hadida, was captured on video engaging in these actions.

Despite these tactics, Magen Herut holds charitable status in Canada, enabling it to receive tax-deductible donations. A public campaign is now pressuring the Canada Revenue Agency to revoke this status.

The same exposé highlighted the Abraham Global Peace Initiative — a Zionist lobby group that hosted Israeli Ambassador Gilad Erdan at a luxury fundraiser in Toronto. Erdan has publicly stated that the United Nations should be “wiped off the face of the earth” while defending Israel’s bombing of UN facilities and the deaths of over 300 UN staff.

The Abraham group published a white paper in early 2025 calling for:

• Federal oversight of Canadian universities and curricula;
• A “values test” for immigrants requiring affirmation of “Israel’s right to exist.”

This is not mere advocacy. It is ideological enforcement through state-sanctioned channels.

“Zionism is not content to occupy land. It seeks to occupy language, policy, and law — even in countries where it has no border.” — Samira Moyed, On The Line Media

These claims are not fringe opinions. They are supported by international law, historical record, and on-the-ground journalism. To ignore them is not neutrality — it is complicity.

Final Note: Why We Speak

This essay is not a call for violence, nor does it erase trauma. It calls to end genocide and apartheid and affirms that no people — Jewish, Muslim, Christian, or otherwise — should live under racial supremacy.

Zionism is a political project born of trauma and sustained by domination. Ending it does not end Jewish life in the region; it ends a regime that justifies starvation, displacement, and bombing children in safety’s name.

There is no moral defense for ethnic cleansing, no excuse for flattening hospitals, no justification for silencing a child’s cry for help.

The world watches.
 The children watch.
 If conscience remains, we must speak — clearly, loudly, without apology — until freedom comes.

Speaking truth is not only an act of protest — it is an act of transformation. For those born into power, that truth can be excruciating. But it can also be redemptive.

As Miko Peled reflects:

“I describe myself as an Israeli who was liberated by Palestinians… I liberated myself from a very racist ideology thanks to Palestinians who allowed me, very graciously, to go through that excruciating process.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

Peled’s words remind us: liberation is not a gift given to the oppressed. It is a light they carry — and sometimes extend to those who once denied it. To speak now is to walk that path with them. Not out of pity. Out of respect. Out of necessity.

We do not speak because it is safe.
 We speak because silence kills.
 We speak because there is no other honest way to live.

This is all it means to be human (Anonymous)

“We read each name
 of the 15,613 children
 who had been killed in Gaza.
 We began at 10AM.
 We had not even got to
 the 5 year olds by 3PM.
 
 What does it mean
 to be part of a world
 that allows this?

Each child was a beacon.
 A glowing light that was loved.
 So many of us cried through
 the names we were given to read.
 It took till 2.30AM to read
 every name out loud.

What does it mean
 to be a human in a world
 that allows this to happen.

A Holocaust survivor
 his eyes full of tears and kindness
 carried the names he read like a prayer.
 His voice tender as a cradle to guide
 thousands of lights to the stars.

This is all it means to be human.
 To know the beating heart
 of the world even when it is a wound.”

• Anonymous Palestinian Poet

Further Reading & Voices of Conscience

Legal & Human Rights
 • Franck Magennis
 • UN Special Rapporteurs & ICC filings
 • Human Rights Watch / Amnesty International

Jewish Voices of Dissent
 • Norman Finkelstein
 • Gabor Maté
 • Noam Chomsky
 • Miko Peled — Israeli author, former IDF soldier (The General’s Son)

Historical & Political Analysis
 • Ilan Pappé
 • Ta-Nehisi Coates
 • Rashid Khalidi
 • Edward Said

Global Contrast & Alternative Models
 • China’s Foreign Ministry White Papers
 • The Beijing Declaration (2024)
 • South Africa’s ICC Filings

Bibliography

YouTube — Channel 4 News. “The Israeli Reservists Refusing to Fight in Gaza.” Channel 4 News segment, May 27, 2025. (Report on over 100 IDF reservists who refuse to serve in Gaza; includes testimony of Yamil, a soldier confessing to shooting unarmed people “because their lives didn’t matter…”.) https://www.channel4.com/news/the-israeli-reservists-refusing-to-fight-in-gaza.

Amer, Mo. Mo Amer: Mohammed in Texas. Directed by Stan Lathan. Netflix, 2022. Stand-up comedy special.

Amnesty International. Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity. London: Amnesty International, 2022. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/5141/2022/en/.

Anonymous Palestinian Poet. This Is All It Means to Be Human. Reposted by Nikita Gill and Misan Harriman. Instagram, May 2025.

Ball, Krystal. Comment during Breaking Points podcast, on U.S. official’s resignation from the Gaza aid program. Video podcast, November 2023. (Krystal Ball: “The guy the U.S. picked to run the program — he resigned. Said it was too much. That tells you everything.”)

Bernstein, Matt. Instagram post (@mattxiv), October 2023. (Graphic advocating for Palestinian children, noting disproportionate casualties.) https://www.instagram.com/p/CyL… (accessed Nov. 2023).

BreakThrough News. “‘Andor’ Star: I Refuse to Stay Silent on Gaza.” YouTube video, 15:59. June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8zz5AK1zog

Blumenthal, Max, and Wyatt Reed. “Israeli Mossad Named as Funder of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.” The Grayzone, May 29, 2025. https://thegrayzone.com/2025/05/29/israeli-mossad-gaza-humanitarian-foundation-aid/.

Blumenthal, Max. “The Truth Behind the D.C. Shooting and Its Political Fallout.” The Grayzone, May 30, 2025. https://thegrayzone.com
 (Includes discussion on Daniel Maté’s commentary and the framing of the incident.)

Chomsky, Noam. Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians. Updated ed. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999.

Coates, Ta-Nehisi. The Message. New York: One World, 2024. (Includes Coates’s essay on witnessing “Jim Crow on steroids” in the West Bank, e.g. “What I once thought was justice, I now understand as domination.”)

Cohen, Dan. Comment in interview on The Jimmy Dore Show, November 2023. (Dan Cohen: “Zionism is a pseudo-Messianic, colonial nationalist movement that rebranded Jewish identity into a racialized nation-state project. It is not Judaism — it is an instrument of imperial power.”) YouTube video.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. UN General Assembly Resolution 260 A (III), 9 December 1948. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf.

Daas, Rua. “Anti-Genocide Pledge: Palestinian Activists Make Record of Global Solidarity With Gaza.” BreakThrough News, May 31, 2025. Video, 14:23. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIDEO_ID_HERE (replace with real URL).

Donlevy, Katherine. “Greta Thunberg to Sail to Gaza on Humanitarian Ship as Critics Beg Her to Stay with Hamas: ‘Let’s Hope It’s a One-Way Voyage.’” New York Post, May 31, 2025. https://nypost.com/2025/05/31/news/greta-thunberg-to-sail-to-gaza-on-humanitarian-ship-as-critics-beg-her-to-stay/.

DWS News. “Greta Thunberg Sails to Gaza — after Surviving a Drone Attack!” YouTube video, 3:23. May 31, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtgAsw6ADiQ&ab_channel=DWSNews

Finkelstein, Norman G. The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. New York: Verso Books, 2000. (See Finkelstein’s critique: “The Holocaust has become an industry — not to honor the dead, but to deflect criticism of the powerful.”)

Ghaffar-Siddiqui, Sabreena. Public statement on the comparison of Nazism and Zionism in education. Posted to X (formerly Twitter), May 2025. https://twitter.com
 (Statement on future teaching plans and public reckoning.)

Grant, Ellie. “Barrister Representing Hamas Says Legal Bid Aims to ‘End Israel’.” The Jewish Chronicle, May 1, 2025. (Quotes Franck Magennis calling Israel an apartheid state and Gaza a ‘concentration camp.’) https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/barrister-representing-hamas-end-israel-cfl0sjla.

Grim, Ryan. Comment during Breaking Points news show (CounterPoints episode), November 2023. (Ryan Grim: “Four people were crushed by bags of flour and killed… this was initially blamed on Hamas, but eyewitnesses and footage show it was panic, desperation, and bullets.”)

Human Rights Watch. “‘A Threshold Crossed’: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution.” Human Rights Watch report, April 27, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution.

Jewish Voice for Peace. “Zionism is Not Judaism — It Is the Betrayal of It.” Not In Our Name campaign statement, 2023. (JVP statement widely quoted: “Zionism is not Judaism — it is the betrayal of it.”) https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/zionism-is-not-judaism.

Khalidi, Rashid. The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2020.

Lascaris, Dimitri. Post on X (Twitter), Nov. 15, 2023. (“They are using starvation to herd people into what are essentially concentration camps in the desert. American mercenaries are laughing while guarding starving civilians. This is Nazi shit.”) https://twitter.com/dimitrilascaris/status/159272… (archived).

Macklemore. “Hind’s Hall.” Single. Bendo LLC, released May 6, 2024. (Protest song honoring 6-year-old Hind Rajab and supporting Palestinian students; proceeds to UNRWA.) Available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/xyz… and streaming platforms.

Malcolm X. Speech on the Palestine question, Cairo, July 1964. (Malcolm X: “The Palestinian struggle is not just a cry for justice — it’s a blistering battle for the most fundamental human rights that every living soul on this planet should inherit by birthright…an unyielding resistance against the oppressive, suffocating grip of occupation.”) Quoted in Workers World, Feb. 2024.

Mandela, Nelson. “Address by President Nelson Mandela at International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.” Pretoria, 4 December 1997. (Mandela: “We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”) https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/speech-president-nelson-mandela-palestine-1997.

Maté, Aaron. Comment on The Tea with Myriam François, MPWR Productions, May 2025. YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/@TheTeawithMyriamFrancois
 (Note: Maté critiques weaponization of antisemitism and identifies structural suppression of dissent.)

Maté, Gabor. Foreword to A Land With A People: Palestinians and Jews Confront Zionism, edited by Esther Farmer et al. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2021. (Dr. Maté, a Holocaust survivor, recounts visiting Gaza — “I cried every day for two weeks after visiting Gaza… ‘Never again’ means never again for anyone, not just for one people.”)

Maté, Gabor. “It’s impossible to have your eyes open and not have your heart broken.” Instagram video, April 2025. Accessed June 2, 2025. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIJzEmQOKo3/

Moyed, Samira. “TORONTO ZIONIST GROUP HOSTS ISRAELI AMBASSADOR TO UNITED NATIONS.” On The Line Media, June 1, 2025. Video, 16:50. https://www.patreon.com/posts/toronto-zionist-104325962

MSNBC. “Ben Rhodes: Situation in Gaza ‘Unimaginably Worse Than We Can Even Tell from the Outside.’” YouTube video, 6:11. June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmDhMsT4kE4

Olmert, Ehud. “Will Not One Israeli Say: End the War for Gaza’s Sake?” Haaretz (Tel Aviv), May 25, 2025. (Former PM Olmert writes: “What we are doing in Gaza now is a war of extermination: indiscriminate, unrestrained, brutal and criminal killing of civilians… Yes, Israel is committing war crimes.”) https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2025-05-25/… (in Hebrew; English summary in The Guardian, May 27, 2025).

Ophuls, Marcel. The Sorrow and the Pity. Documentary film. Directed by Marcel Ophuls. France/Switzerland: Nouvelles Éditions de Films, 1969.
 (Referenced regarding elite collaboration and public apathy under occupation.)

Pappé, Ilan. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2006. (Historical analysis by Pappé, who notes “the Nakba was not a single catastrophe, but an ongoing process” of dispossession.)

Peled, Miko. Interview by Hammy. Let’s Just Talk. June 1, 2025. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_N8SNfZyV8&ab_channel=Let%27sJustTalk.

Peled, Miko. The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine. 2nd ed. Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books, 2016. (Memoir by Peled, former IDF soldier; Peled has said, “Open up the definition of the crime of genocide… compare it to what’s been done to Palestinians since 1948 — it checks almost every box.”)

Piers Morgan Uncensored. “Is Israel Committing Genocide? Norman Finkelstein & Benny Morris Debate Gaza War | Piers Morgan Uncensored.” YouTube video, 10:06. Posted May 28, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4jN7IEYNOs&ab_channel=PiersMorganUncensored. “Is Israel Committing Genocide? Norman Finkelstein & Benny Morris Debate Gaza War | Piers Morgan Uncensored.” YouTube video, 10:06. Posted May 28, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4jN7IEYNOs&ab_channel=PiersMorganUncensored

Said, Edward W. The Question of Palestine. New York: Times Books, 1979. (Seminal work by Said on Palestinian dispossession and the Zionist project.)

Savetsky, Lizzy. Viral TikTok video confronting an Arab taxi driver in NYC, April 2025. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@lizzysavetsky
 (Referenced as a symbol of performative victimhood and Zionist narrative.)

Sky News. “Gaza Hospital Attack: Analysis Contradicts Israel’s Evidence Justifying Airstrike.” Sky News, May 14, 2025. https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-hospital-attack-analysis-contradicts-israels-evidence-justifying-airstrike-13367823.

South Africa (Department of Int’l Relations and Cooperation). Application Instituting Proceedings against Israel under the Genocide Convention. Filed at the International Court of Justice, 29 December 2023. (Seeks an order to halt Israel’s actions in Gaza, alleging “Israel has failed to prevent genocide” in Gaza.) ICJ General List №186 (2023).

South Africa et al. Referral of the Situation in Palestine to the International Criminal Court. Article 14 ICC Referral, 17 November 2023. (Joint referral by South Africa and other States Parties urging ICC investigation of war crimes and genocide in Gaza.) ICC Registry №2023/066 (2023).

TRT World. “Israeli troops are systematically forcing Palestinians to act as human shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank… ‘Mosquito protocol.’” Instagram post (@trtworld), May 25, 2025. (Summarizing reports by AP/TRT: Palestinians, like Ayman Abu Hamadan, were forced at gunpoint to clear houses for Israeli units — a practice soldiers dubbed the “mosquito protocol.”)

Tutu, Desmond. “Apartheid in the Holy Land.” The Guardian, April 29, 2002. (Archbishop Tutu on witnessing Palestinian humiliation: “I’ve seen the checkpoints and roadblocks — it reminded me so much of what we experienced under apartheid… Israel will never get true security through oppressing another people. A true peace can only be built on justice.”) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/29/comment.

UK Artists for Palestine. “Letter from Cultural Figures Against Arms Sales to Israel.” Artists for Palestine UK, May 2025. https://artistsforpalestine.org.uk
 (Signed by Dua Lipa, Riz Ahmed, Benedict Cumberbatch, Tilda Swinton, et al.)

United Nations General Assembly. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention). 75 U.N.T.S. 287, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (adopted Aug. 12, 1949). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/3858ee?OpenDocument.

United Nations. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. 2187 U.N.T.S. 90, adopted July 17, 1998, entered into force July 1, 2002. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf.

Willey, Damien. The Houthis Just MASSIVELY Expanded Their Air Blockade on Israel!. YouTube video, 12:02. Kernow Damo, June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/KernowDamo

Winnipeg Free Press. “Owners of Café Accused of Faking Antisemitic Attack.” Winnipeg Free Press, August 15, 2019. https://www.winnipegfreepress.com
 (Incident referenced as example of staged antisemitism to weaponize victimhood.)

“Why Tot Celebrity Ms. Rachel Waded Into the Gaza Debate.” New York Times, May 22, 2025. (Reporter Marc Tracy details how children’s entertainer Rachel Griffin-Accurso (“Ms. Rachel”) posted on social media, “When it’s controversial to advocate for children killed in the thousands…we have lost our way,” prompting backlash and even queries if she was “paid by Hamas.”) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/22/style/ms-rachel-israel-gaza.html.