The Children Are Dying and the World Is Watching

Don’t Look Away

The Children Are Dying and the World Is Watching — Speaking Truth Amid Gaza’s Genocide, Denial, and Empire’s Moral Decay

By Jorah Kai

Would you prefer to read this on a simple white background? Click here to read it on Medium.

By Jorah Kai

Table of Contents
 Editor’s Note
 Abstract: What This Essay Does — and What It Doesn’t
 Why This Matters to You
 I. The Cost of Silence
 II. This Is Not Complicated: It’s a Genocide
 III. Franck Magennis and the Legal Case Against Apartheid
 IV. Hamas: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
 V. Michael and the Settler-Colonial Blueprint
 VI. The Collapse of the Zionist Narrative
 VII. A Vision Beyond Apartheid
 VIII. Why Is This So Dangerous to Say?
 IX. The Blueprint of Genocide and Apartheid: How History Repeats — and How It Ends
 X. China and the Global South: Diplomacy of Principle
 XI. They Have Friends Everywhere: Youth, Rebellion, and the Collapse of Official Truth
 XII. The Time to Speak Is Now
 XIII. A Final Call to Action
 XIV. Listen to the Children
 XV. Appendix: Controversial Claims, Backed by Evidence

Editor’s Note
 This essay bears witness to one of our era’s defining moral crises: Gaza’s unfolding genocide and the global systems that sustain it. Born as a journalistic indictment of mounting civilian deaths and a collapse of international law, it has evolved into comprehensive witness — melding legal analysis, history, and lived experience into urgent moral clarity. This is not comfort reading; it calls for active responsibility.

Jewish dissent lies at its moral center. Jewish Voice for Peace, rabbis, historians, descendants of Holocaust survivors, and former Israeli soldiers have risked careers, community, and safety to name crimes that Zionism conceals. As JVP insists, Zionism diverges sharply from Judaism.

Among these voices, none weighs more heavily than Miko Peled — once an IDF combatant, grandson of Avraham Katsnelson (a signatory of Israel’s Declaration of Independence), and son of General Mattityahu Peled, a key military architect of the 1967 war. Raised within Zionism’s architecture, Peled broke its logic after his thirteen-year-old niece, Smadar, was killed by a Palestinian suicide bomber. He met with Palestinian families, studied erased histories, and emerged as a fierce critic:

“You don’t get to judge the people you’re helping cage, starve, and bomb — especially not when your taxes are footing the bill.”
 Once called a “prince of Israel,” Peled now stands unequivocally with Palestine.

This edition follows Chicago style, uses numbered sections for clarity, and includes block quotes to emphasize key testimony. It refuses euphemism and silence. It is not easy reading — but it is urgent.

Abstract: What This Essay Does — and What It Doesn’t
 This essay is not about hate. It does not erase Jewish history or deny Jewish survival; it does not attack faith or identity. Instead, it delivers a direct indictment of Zionism — the secular nationalist project that has underpinned seventy-seven years of apartheid, military occupation, and now genocide in Gaza.

As Miko Peled puts it:

“Open up the definition of the crime of genocide. Compare that to what has been happening to Palestinians since 1948 — you’ll see, it checks almost every box.”

Courts from the ICJ to the ICC are calling it what it is. Jewish critics — Norman Finkelstein, Gabor Maté, Ilan Pappé, Miko Peled — remind us that complicity is not a matter of faith, but of silence and power.

Some dear friends find “Zionist” fraught — tied, they say, to survival, not supremacy. I understand that. But critics insist that Zionism is a colonial agenda: an “apocalyptic death cult with nuclear weapons.” This work is grounded in facts, citations, and law — but also in conscience. It is blunt where it must be, precise where it can be, and unflinching throughout. It confronts dehumanization and the machinery of denial that sustains it.

“God has placed great power in the children of Gaza. They are like crystal balls through which the souls of men are examined,” wrote a friend.

This essay is not written to persuade those who choose blindness. It is for anyone who feels this happening — and refuses to look away. Come with your heart open. The hard part begins now. Silence is no longer an option.

Why This Matters to You
 Maybe this feels far away — just another tragic headline, unfolding in a place you’ve never been. Yet Gaza’s crisis is about you, too, and about the world you already live in.

The bombs in Gaza are paid for by your taxes. “Made in the USA” is stamped on the steel that crushes Palestinian homes and burns entire refugee communities alive, livestreamed on TikTok for our children to see. Those same budgets could fund healthcare, housing, or schools — yet they underwrite drones, smart bombs, and AI-assisted warfare. And that is only part of the story.

What unfolds in Gaza doesn’t stay in Gaza. In March 2024, Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish PhD student at Tufts University, was walking home in Boston when masked federal agents seized her without warrant. The ACLU called it a kidnapping. Around the same time, Kilmar Abrego García — a U.S. legal resident and father of four — was deported to El Salvador and imprisoned in a supermax facility, despite never having been there. Officers mistook his Navy-mechanic tattoos for gang affiliation. The cost of that mistake was torture. Even after a unanimous Supreme Court ordered his return, the administration doctored evidence and deepened a constitutional crisis as the U.S. slid toward authoritarianism.

At the U.S.–Mexico border, Jerce Reyes Barrios — doctoral researcher and U.S. citizen — discovered AI-powered facial-recognition towers tracking her. She wasn’t crossing; she was observing a protest. Still, her presence was flagged and added to a watchlist. None of these are anomalies — they are signals.

The same surveillance systems used in Gaza — thermal sensors, biometric towers, AI threat modeling — now line the U.S. southern border. Hundreds of “virtual walls” are in place. The company that builds them for Israel, Elbit Systems, is now a major U.S. contractor. This feedback loop of occupation is neither dystopian nor hypothetical: tested abroad, deployed here.

But it isn’t just about borders; it’s about ideology. The language of “terrorism,” “security,” and “preemptive defense” — rooted in Zionist logic treating Palestinian resistance as an existential threat — is now repackaged to brand migrants, students, activists, and even journalists as enemies. Gaza is not simply a war zone: it is a prototype — a test lab for technology, rhetoric, and policy — refined abroad, exported, and turned inward.

Yet some in the Global South see through this. China, for example, recognized Palestine’s statehood in January 2024 and hosted the Beijing Declaration that October, convening fourteen Palestinian factions — including Hamas and Fatah — for the first time in years. This was more than symbolism; it rejected Western “strategic ambiguity” and affirmed that negotiation must include all voices, not just Washington’s picks.

So when someone says, “This isn’t your fight,” ask them: Why are your dollars paying for it? Why are your neighbors tracked by towers built for war? Why is dissent in your own country treated like sedition? Gaza is not just a headline — it is a mirror. And if you watch, then you are already part of it. Silence is not neutrality; it is complicity.

The question isn’t whether this matters to you. It is whether you will admit that it already does.

I. The Cost of Silence
 I did not grow up thinking much about Palestine. In Canada, it felt distant — another headline framed as “Israel defending itself,” with Palestinians portrayed as irrational, angry, collectively suspect. Then came 9/11, the War on Terror, video games in which every enemy spoke Arabic, and newsfeeds collapsing an entire region into caricature. I absorbed it. We all did. That ideology was structural, cultural, total — and for my silence, I am ashamed.

I am a children’s author, teacher, journalist, and grandfather — and now I am awake. No one can watch families starve under siege, hospitals bombed, and children buried in rubble and still pretend this is complicated. I could not.

What radicalized me was grief: imagining my granddaughter Naomi crying from hunger, sick with no medicine, begging for help — and knowing I could do nothing. That helplessness is the unbearable weight every Palestinian parent carries. A settler-colonial state built on ethnic supremacy is trying to erase their people, and it is doing so with Western money.

American jets enforce the siege. British planes conduct spy missions to designate Israeli targets. American vetoes block United Nations aid. Western media spin atrocity into ambiguity — and still, leaders wonder why the world turns away. What was once “security technology” in Palestine is now “border management” in Arizona and Texas: virtual walls of apartheid infrastructure exported. This is not mere surveillance; it is domination. Gaza’s forced starvation, mass detention, and algorithmic dehumanization are blueprints for authoritarianism at home.

An old French documentary has resurfaced for reasons that sting. Marcel Ophuls’s The Sorrow and the Pity shattered the myth of widespread French resistance under Nazi occupation. His film revealed an uncomfortable truth: the French elite largely tolerated and cooperated with the Nazis, while true resistance fighters were mocked, isolated, and feared.

“The French actually were pretty content in many places… resistance fighters were isolated, hated, considered a nuisance… The film never made it to big theaters in Paris. It was soft-banned. Only decades later did it gain fame — outside France.”

That history is not just about World War II. It is about what power protects — and what it suppresses. Today, dissident voices calling out genocide in Gaza are demonized, jailed, and surveilled. Journalists like Asa Winstanley and Richard Medhurst, and activists from Palestine Action, face raids under the same logic that once labeled resistance to fascism a nuisance. Collaboration was once wrapped in nationalism; today, it is draped in diplomacy and “security.”

Jewish writer Matt Bernstein put it plainly: “The idea that me, a Jew, is somehow safer because a student is getting deported or because a university lost its funding? That’s not safety. That’s fascism.” He is right. Authoritarians always cloak violence in the language of protection. But protection for whom? When remaining silent in the face of atrocity is the only path to being seen as “good,” that is not safety. It is submission.

Yet some voices break the mold, naming crimes with uncompromising clarity. Miko Peled — born into a prominent Israeli military family, grandson of Avraham Katsnelson (a signatory of Israel’s Declaration of Independence), and son of General Mattityahu Peled, a key architect of the 1967 war — understands what many in the West refuse to confront: resistance is a symptom, not an obscenity; funding annihilation while calling for restraint is moral cowardice; judgment without context is hypocrisy.

Even within the Jewish community, this awakening grows. Gabor Maté, a Holocaust survivor and physician, raised his son to support Israel but later confessed: “Everything I had been told was a lie.” His son, journalist Aaron Maté, carries that legacy forward — not out of betrayal, but fidelity to truth.

The horror of this moment is realizing that a hundred years after our grandparents fought the Nazis, fascism is alive again — and this time, it wears our uniform. We did not defeat it. We absorbed it. Now, the empire that once vowed “never again” is funding its next genocide. We no longer have the right to look away.

II. It’s Not Complicated. It’s a Crime

The forbidden word is genocide. Utter it, and you risk being dismissed as hysterical, political, or unhinged. But what else describes the deliberate starvation and bombardment of a besieged civilian population? When food convoys are blocked, hospitals leveled, aid workers killed, and children lie in mass graves, it is reality — not metaphor. Yet we’re told, “It’s complicated,” a rhetorical shield that disables thought, compassion, and action. As Ta-Nehisi Coates observes, “Everyone says it’s complicated. But it’s not. Apartheid is wrong. And there’s nothing in history that justifies it.”

In Gaza, the landscape itself testifies to intent: this is not a war zone but engineered erasure. “There is nothing about Gaza’s landscape that says anything other than this is the annihilation of a population,” notes Arwa Damon. Buildings reduced to rubble, children scavenging for scraps, entire neighborhoods erased — these are not incidental wounds of combat. They are the blueprint of destruction. Whenever the terrain screams systematic liquidation, any claim of “collateral damage” crumbles beneath photographic evidence and survivor testimony. Gaza is not merely a battlefield; it is the scene of a crime in progress.

Aid as a Weapon
 For eighty-seven consecutive days, Gaza endured total blockade — no food, water, medicine, or fuel. This violates international humanitarian law and blatantly defies emergency orders from the International Court of Justice demanding unrestricted aid.

“How many more dead girls and boys will it take?” asked Edouard Beigbeder, UNICEF’s Middle East and North Africa director, after reporting that over 50,000 Gaza children have been killed or injured since October 2023. “What level of horror must be livestreamed before the international community fully steps up, uses its influence, and takes bold, decisive action to force the end of this ruthless killing of children?”

Under mounting pressure — rare condemnations from France, Canada, and Spain’s formal declaration of genocide — Israel opened a narrow “aid corridor.” What followed was chaos, not relief. As Ryan Grim reports, “Four people were crushed by bags of flour and killed… Initially blamed on Hamas, eyewitnesses and footage show panic, desperation, and bullets.” This was optics, not aid. Starvation wasn’t the issue — the photographs were.

After sustained protests at MIT, the institute cut ties with Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer. Yet Elbit’s drones continued bombing tents in Gaza, killing civilians. Gaza’s Government Media Office accused Israel of a “horrific and deliberate crime,” charging that occupation forces bait desperate Palestinians into so-called aid centers — placed in exposed, high-risk areas — only to gun them down. A Palestinian doctor at al-Tahrir Hospital lost nine of her ten children when her home was bombed; days later, her husband succumbed to wounds. “The children were completely burnt.” In three words, that moment destroys all euphemism: it is not collateral damage but pure erasure. A hospital there can be both sanctuary and morgue; parents become first responders to their own annihilation. When her brother arrived at the burning house, he found his sister-in-law running on foot, only to see “four of her children pulled out, charred, right in front of her eyes.” Any pretense of a combat zone shatters into pure, unfiltered atrocity — proof that silence is complicity.

Under the guise of humanitarian relief, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation — tied to U.S. mercenary firms — forces civilians through biometric-scanned corridors patrolled by drones. The system proved so dehumanizing that the U.S.-appointed director resigned in protest. “The guy the U.S. picked to run the program resigned, saying it was too much. That tells you everything,” explains Krystal Ball. This is siege warfare rebranded: starvation as strategy, militarized distribution as a smokescreen. Over 18,000 children now face imminent death by malnutrition. Body bags outnumber food trucks. The United Nations has declared Gaza the hungriest place on earth. As Dimitri Lascaris bluntly states, “They’re using starvation to herd people into concentration camps. American mercenaries guard starving civilians. This is Nazi shit.”

Genocide, Legally and Literally
 The Genocide Convention defines genocide as inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group in whole or in part. Backed by the U.S., U.K., and until recently Germany, Israel meets that threshold. South Africa’s case before the International Court of Justice and the 2025 International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant confirm this legal reality. “If this is not genocide, what is?” asks Miko Peled, the former IDF combatant turned Israeli dissident.

Even Germany, symbolic custodian of Holocaust memory, wavers. On May 30, 2025, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul announced a formal review of arms exports to Israel, citing violations of international law: “This is about ensuring basic human rights. The sick, the weak, and children are first to die.” Those words struck like a moral earthquake: when governments question arms sales and file genocide cases, consensus emerges from rubble.

Meanwhile, the U.S. vetoes ceasefire resolutions, the U.K. ships weapons, and the EU averts its gaze. This isn’t complexity — it’s complicity. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert admits without hesitation: “What we’re doing in Gaza now is a war of devastation: indiscriminate, limitless, cruel and criminal killing of civilians… Yes, Israel is committing war crimes.” If even Olmert acknowledges this, what excuse remains?

The Red Line
 Genocide doesn’t begin with bombs. It begins with excuses, euphemisms, paperwork, and silence. But even if we ignore international law, what does our moral compass say? In America, if an active shooter were reported inside a school or hospital, we would never consider bombing the entire building. The innocent inside would matter; police and media would wait, evacuate, negotiate. Lives would be spared.

So why is it acceptable for the Israeli military to flatten a hospital in Gaza because Hamas might be hiding below? Why do we apply one standard of human rights to ourselves and another — soaked in blood and indifference — to people in Palestine, Sudan, or Yemen? Just days ago, a Sky News analyst dismissed claims of Hamas tunnels under a bombed hospital, citing nothing more than water stains. “There’s no conclusive evidence of a tunnel,” they concluded. Their justification was not only immoral but false.

Miko Peled captures the absurdity: “If you believe it’s okay to bomb a hospital and hurt a child because the devil is in the basement, then that’s one set of values. But I do not believe — even if the devil is there — it’s okay to harm a single hair on a child’s head.” This isn’t about military tactics; it’s about moral foundations. A civilization that weighs a child’s life against “terror” is already lost. Peled forces us to confront what many refuse to say: genocide is not complicated — it’s a choice.

Silence and Repression
 Fear is the currency of silence. In the U.S., repression cloaks itself in national symbols: student visas revoked, protesters jailed, schools defunded — not in the name of safety, but of silence. As Norman Finkelstein sharply observes, “They don’t call you antisemitic because you hate Jews. They call you antisemitic because they hate truth.” To hesitate now is not neutrality — it is betrayal.

III. Franck Magennis and the Legal Case Against Apartheid
 “You can’t compare this to apartheid,” people often caution. But international law demands exactly that comparison — and British human rights barrister Franck Magennis proved it.

As former head of the U.K.’s largest civil-service union, Magennis sued the Home Office on behalf of a Palestinian man seeking asylum. This was no ideological protest; it was a legal challenge to Israel’s dual legal systems in the occupied West Bank. Magennis anchored his case in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. He avoided rhetoric and stuck to the statutes. In January 2025, the court agreed.

“Separate laws, movement restrictions, dual systems of justice — these are not opinions; these are facts. These are the elements of apartheid under international law.”
 ― Franck Magennis

Zionism’s colonial logic — intended to remake Jewish identity into a racialized, territorial claim — meets its legal reckoning here. Dan Cohen, speaking in November 2023, described Zionism as a “pseudo-Messianic, colonial nationalist movement that rebranded Jewish identity into a racialized nation-state project. It is not Judaism — it is the rejection of it.” Herzl’s late-19th-century prescriptions for “redeeming” Palestine by force gave way to 750,000 Palestinians expelled in 1948. Today, Zionism’s secular and religious factions unite around forced expulsions and a supremacist ethnostate. Christianity’s Old Testament language merged with European imperialism now produces an apartheid reality on the ground.

Settlers seize Palestinian homes while families shop for groceries — shrugging, “If I don’t steal it, someone else will.” They bulldoze villages, torch ancient olive groves, fire homemade rockets from fortified hilltops, and host barbecues beside the apartheid wall as children starve on the other side. They loot aid convoys, beat farmers, poison livestock, and desecrate mosques and cemeteries — often under the watch of Israeli soldiers. These are not rogue actors; they are policy.

Under international law — Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, and dozens of U.N. resolutions — the settlement enterprise is unequivocally illegal. Yet it continues, funded by the state and protected by Western silence. In May 2025, the U.K. sanctioned settler leader Daniella Weiss for “promoting and supporting acts of aggression and violence against Palestinian individuals.” If international law means anything, it must apply not only to rockets but to rooftops built on stolen land.

Now, the global legal order responds. In October 2023, South Africa submitted a 5,000-page dossier to the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide. In 2025, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. These are not symbolic gestures — they are formal indictments at the highest level.

What began in British courts now ripples worldwide. Some still dismiss “apartheid” as hyperbole, but Magennis’s victory proved it is precise. South Africa enforced pass laws and forced removals; Israel enforces checkpoints, segregates roads, and grants civil rights based on ethnicity. When pro-Israel lobbyists moved to have him disbarred, Magennis replied simply:

“They didn’t come after me because I lied; they came after me because I told the truth.”

He also dismantled the misuse of antisemitism as a shield for Zionism: “You can’t fight racism while supporting Zionism.” A movement rooted in ethno-national supremacy cannot coexist with genuine anti-racist ethics.

Finally, Magennis exposed the politics behind the “terrorist” label. By today’s standards, Nelson Mandela would have been disqualified from peace talks — yet Mandela declared,

“Our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”

States often brand the oppressed as terrorists while shielding powerful perpetrators. Magennis’s legal victories are more than symbolic; they are a roadmap. Law, justice, and moral courage demand we name apartheid for what it is — and end it.

IV. Hamas: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
 A Settler-Colonial Legacy

To understand Hamas, we must first understand the world that built it — not through ideology, but through history — layered with betrayal, occupation, and violence long before 1987.

In 1916, Britain and France signed the Sykes–Picot Agreement, carving the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire into colonial zones — dividing lands they had not yet conquered. To hasten the collapse of Ottoman rule, Britain promised Sharif Hussein of Mecca independence if he led a revolt. He did. The Arabs bled for empire — and were repaid with a knife in the back.

In 1917, the Balfour Declaration pledged Palestine not to its people, but to “a national home for the Jewish people” — without the consent of the Arab majority. This was not diplomacy; it was betrayal. What followed was textbook settler colonialism, refined in Ireland, India, and Kenya: redraw borders, rename cities, suppress resistance, replace the ruled with rulers. Europe armed, trained, and installed Zionist settlers as imperial proxies to pacify the native population. The racial hierarchy was clear: Europeans on top, Arabs beneath.

By 1947, the United Nations partitioned 55 percent of Palestine for a Jewish minority. Within a year, over 750,000 Palestinians had fled or been expelled. What remains today is not a state, but a fragmented archipelago of occupied zones — disconnected, blockaded, and rationed. Electricity, water, movement, and breath itself are regulated. This is not governance; it is incarceration.

From this crucible of loss and domination emerged Hamas. Formed during the First Intifada as an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas blended religious identity with social infrastructure — building schools, clinics, and food distribution networks alongside its armed resistance. Over time, it became Gaza’s de facto government — and a movement willing to use violence for political ends.

Whether Hamas is called a terrorist group or a resistance force depends not on morality but on legal frameworks — and political convenience. The U.S., EU, Canada, and Israel designate it a terrorist organization. Many Global South nations — China, South Africa, Iran, Turkey — recognize it as a legitimate resistance group under occupation.

This debate is not new. Nelson Mandela and the ANC were once labeled terrorists. So were Irish republicans — and Zionist militias like Irgun and Lehi. History is full of the oppressed criminalized by those in power. Under the Geneva Conventions and multiple U.N. resolutions, peoples under foreign military occupation have the right to resist, including by force — so long as civilians are not deliberately targeted. This is not semantic hairsplitting; it is international law. Without that right, resistance collapses into criminality — and occupation becomes eternal.

Some insist on symmetry, claiming that all sides commit evil and must be equally condemned. But as Israeli dissident Miko Peled reminds us:

“You cannot create symmetry between the oppressor and the oppressed… The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — and that is the apartheid state established by the Zionists in Palestine in 1948.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

We are told to denounce Hamas before we can grieve Gaza’s dead. But we are never asked to denounce Zionism before mourning Israeli lives. This is not justice. It is conditioning. Peled cuts through the myth:

“There’s no good Zionism. There’s no bad Zionism. There’s Zionism. It’s a racist ideology. It’s an apartheid ideology. It needs to be dismantled.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

This isn’t about Hamas or even Hamas’s actions. It’s about the conditions that guarantee their emergence. Until we dismantle the system that cages a people, we will keep condemning symptoms while funding the disease. Like the ANC or Irish republicans, Hamas did not arise solely from ideology — it was born from dispossession, humiliation, and the vacuum left by failed diplomacy. If we want fewer rockets, we must dismantle the walls and checkpoints that cage a people.

Moreover, blanket “they all voted for Hamas” tropes collapse under scrutiny. As Aaron Maté notes, “It’s dripping with racist contempt that completely dehumanizes two million people.” This UPPERCUT is vital: collective-blame arguments erase half of Gaza’s population, who were neither alive nor old enough to vote when Hamas came to power. In Maté’s words, “More than 50% of Gazans weren’t even alive or old enough to vote when Hamas came to power.” This debunks the idea that Gaza “chose” Hamas, fitting Section IV’s analysis of resistance under occupation.

Louis Theroux’s documentary The Settlers makes this personal. A Texas-born settler casually declares, “Gaza is ours.” Daniella Weiss, self-described “godmother” of the settler movement, boasts, “There will be no option left for a Palestinian state.” This week, the U.K. sanctioned her for inciting violence.

On the ground, settlers steal homes while families shop for groceries, bulldoze villages, torch olive groves, and plant flammable pine trees that feed wildfires. They fire rockets into Palestinian neighborhoods, barbecue beside apartheid walls while children starve, and loot aid convoys with impunity. These are not isolated incidents. Under international law, the entire settlement enterprise is illegal.

And yet, the narrative is reversed. Israel, a nuclear power, secretly funded Hamas for decades — hoping to divide Palestinian factions, sabotage diplomacy, and justify siege. When blowback came, Netanyahu’s government bombed indiscriminately, killing civilians to avoid their capture. Palestinian prisoners are tortured, starved, and raped in Israeli jails — while the media calls those who resist “barbarians.”

“The goal was never to defeat Hamas,” says Shahid Bolsen. “It was to need Hamas — to sabotage diplomacy, provoke violence, and maintain permanent siege.”
 — Shahid Bolsen

Bolsen, often dismissed in Western media as a “radical Islamist,” argues not from morality but structure: resistance was not just inevitable — it was cultivated. The system feeds off Hamas. And the longer it survives, the longer the siege remains justified.

“You cannot understand Hamas,” Bolsen warns, “without understanding the system that benefits from its survival.”

This is not just physical violence. It is narrative warfare. The jailers are called civilized. The jailed are called terrorists. Equating Hamas and the Israeli occupation is like accusing a rape victim and her attacker of equal aggression — it is a moral hallucination.

And yet, in the rubble, a poet speaks. In 2025, Mosab Abu Toha won the Pulitzer Prize for essays written while mourning his children under Israeli bombardment.

“My poems are not weapons,” he said. “They are windows.”

Through those windows, we see grief — not hatred; truth — not propaganda. To call that humanity “terrorism” is a second erasure.

Understanding Hamas does not require endorsement — but it does require memory. Zionism was born of imperial ambition. So was its resistance. International law demands we distinguish resistance from terror — not to excuse all tactics, but to preserve the fundamental right of the oppressed to struggle for freedom. Only then can we begin to imagine justice — not for one side, but for all.IV. Hamas: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
 To understand Hamas, we must first understand the world that built it — not through ideology, but through history: betrayal, occupation, and violence long before 1987.

In 1916, Britain and France carved the Ottoman Arab provinces into colonial fiefdoms under the Sykes–Picot Agreement. Promised independence, Sharif Hussein of Mecca led an Arab revolt, only to be stabbed in the back. A year later, the 1917 Balfour Declaration pledged Palestine to “a national home for the Jewish people,” ignoring the Arab majority. This wasn’t diplomacy; it was textbook settler colonialism: redraw borders, rename cities, suppress resistance, replace the ruled with rulers. Europe armed Zionist settlers as imperial proxies — Europeans on top, Arabs beneath.

By 1947, the U.N. allotted 55 percent of Palestine to a Jewish minority. Within a year, over 750,000 Palestinians had fled or been expelled. What remains is not a state but a fragmented archipelago of occupied zones — disconnected, blockaded, and rationed. Electricity, water, movement, even breath, are regulated. This is not governance; it is incarceration.

From that crucible of loss emerged Hamas. Born in the First Intifada as an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, it blended social infrastructure — schools, clinics, food distribution — with armed resistance. Over time, Hamas became Gaza’s de facto government and a movement willing to use violence for political ends.

Whether Hamas is labeled terrorist or resistance depends not on morality but on legal frameworks and political convenience. The U.S., EU, Canada, and Israel list it as a terrorist organization; many Global South nations — China, South Africa, Iran, Turkey — recognize it as legitimate under occupation.

This debate echoes history. Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress was once branded terrorist. So were Irish republicans — and Zionist militias like Irgun and Lehi. Under the Geneva Conventions and multiple U.N. resolutions, peoples under foreign military occupation have the right to resist, even by force, so long as civilians are not targeted deliberately. Without that right, resistance collapses into criminality — and occupation becomes eternal.

Some demand symmetry, insisting all sides commit equal evil. But as Israeli dissident Miko Peled clarifies:

“You cannot create symmetry between the oppressor and the oppressed… The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — and that is the apartheid state established by the Zionists in Palestine in 1948.”

We are told to denounce Hamas before mourning Gaza’s dead. Yet no one asks Israel to renounce its colonial project before grieving Israeli lives. This is not justice; it is conditioning. Peled dismantles the myth:

“There’s no good Zionism. There’s no bad Zionism. There’s Zionism. It’s a racist ideology. It’s an apartheid ideology. It needs to be dismantled.”

This is not about Hamas’s tactics but about the conditions that guarantee their emergence. Like the ANC or Irish republicans, Hamas did not arise from ideology alone — it was born of dispossession, humiliation, and failed diplomacy. If we want fewer rockets, we must dismantle the walls and checkpoints that cage a people.

Blanket “they all voted for Hamas” tropes collapse under scrutiny. Journalist Aaron Maté notes,

“More than 50 percent of Gazans weren’t even alive or old enough to vote when Hamas came to power.”

Collective-blame arguments erase half of Gaza’s population. They strip away agency to justify eternal occupation.

Louis Theroux’s documentary The Settlers captures the settler mindset: a Texas-born colonist casually declares, “Gaza is ours.” Daniella Weiss, the self-described “godmother” of the settler movement, boasts, “There will be no option left for a Palestinian state.” In May 2025, the U.K. sanctioned her for inciting violence.

On the ground, settlers steal homes while families shop. They bulldoze villages, torch olive groves, and plant flammable pine trees that fuel wildfires. They fire homemade rockets into Palestinian neighborhoods, barbecue next to apartheid walls as children starve, and loot aid convoys with impunity. Under international law, the entire settlement enterprise is illegal; yet it persists, funded by the state and protected by Western silence.

At the same time, Israel — already a nuclear power — secretly funded Hamas for decades to divide Palestinian factions, sabotage diplomacy, and justify siege. When blowback came, Netanyahu’s government bombed civilians to avoid taking prisoners. Palestinian detainees face torture, starvation, and rape in Israeli jails — while Western media calls those who resist “barbarians.”

Political analyst Shahid Bolsen, often dismissed as a “radical Islamist,” reveals this logic:

“The goal was never to defeat Hamas. It was to need Hamas — to sabotage diplomacy, provoke violence, and maintain permanent siege.”

Resistance wasn’t just inevitable; it was cultivated. The system feeds on Hamas; as long as Hamas survives, the siege remains justified.

“You cannot understand Hamas,” Bolsen warns, “without understanding the system that benefits from its survival.”

This is narrative warfare as much as physical violence. The jailers present themselves as civilized; the jailed are branded terrorists. Equating Hamas with the Israeli occupation is like accusing a rape victim and her attacker of equal aggression — it is a moral hallucination.

Yet amid the rubble, a poet speaks. In 2025, Mosab Abu Toha won the Pulitzer Prize for essays written while mourning his children under Israeli bombardment:

“My poems are not weapons; they are windows.”

Through those windows, we see grief, not hate; truth, not propaganda. To call that humanity “terrorism” is a second erasure.

Understanding Hamas does not require endorsement, but it demands memory. Zionism was born of imperial ambition, and so was its resistance. International law requires that we distinguish resistance from terror — not to excuse all tactics, but to preserve the fundamental right of the oppressed to struggle. Only then can we imagine justice for all.

The War Was a Deal: How Hamas and Netanyahu Played Chicken With Gaza
 “The war was not a failure. It was a trap.”
 An anonymous IDF source delivered this verdict in March 2025. Israeli intelligence knew Hamas’s October 7 operation was coming — Egyptian officials warned repeatedly, IDF analysts flagged drills, and surveillance tech tracked unusual movements near the fence. Yet Netanyahu’s government quietly reduced guard presence and left border gates vulnerable. Those warnings weren’t missed; they were shelved.

Hamas, for its part, needed a slaughter. They offered Gaza as a stage and thousands of civilians as its martyrs — knowing that only overwhelming brutality would force the world to look away no longer. This was not a war; it was Mutually Assured Destruction — just not with nuclear weapons, but with narrative gravity. Each side gambled with lives to secure legitimacy, each relying on the other’s monstrosity to justify its own.

“Hamas needed a collapse. So did Bibi.”
 ― Shahid Bolsen

Hamas got outrage; Netanyahu got obedience; Gaza got the grave. As Jewish Voice for Peace put it,

“This isn’t about religion. It’s about power. And power, unaccountable, always hungers for more.”

By design, both sides fed the cycle: the more Hamas’s violence shocked global opinion, the more Israeli escalation was justified. When headlines fixated on October 7’s horrors, fewer asked why Netanyahu had dismantled Gaza’s most vulnerable defenses. And when Israel’s reprisals leveled entire neighborhoods, the world was told it was forced, necessary, “self-defense.”

This was not a breakdown of intelligence; it was a breakdown of morality. In a nightmarish calculus, civilians became leverage on both sides. Gaza’s children were bait to provoke the most extreme response, and the siege that followed proved the trap. For Hamas, it meant international outrage; for Bibi, it meant unwavering domestic support.

V. Michael and the Settler-Colonial Blueprint
 Michael doesn’t argue; he deflects. His slogans — “There was no Palestinian people before 1964,” “Anti-Zionism is antisemitism,” “Hamas started it,” “If we don’t cleanse them, they’ll cleanse us” — ring through comment threads and lecture halls. He speaks not to persuade, but to overwhelm. His volume betrays fear: the ideology he defends is collapsing under its own contradictions.

But Michael is not the cause. He is the echo.

In 1896, Theodor Herzl opened Der Judenstaat with fiction:

“A land without a people for a people without a land.”

With those words, Herzl erased over 400,000 Arabs living under Ottoman rule. His diaries brimmed with plans to “redeem” Palestine through Jewish labor, forging a “New Jew” rooted in conquest rather than diaspora. At the First Zionist Congress (1897), delegates endorsed land deals with absentee landlords — quiet transactions that ended in evictions of Palestinian peasants.

That blueprint hardened into policy. In 1909, David Ben-Gurion warned,

“The country cannot absorb all its children if we do not restrict foreign labour and implant Hebrew labour alone.”

Mandating “Hebrew labour” excluded Arab workers, creating a dual economy — Jewish settlers above, indigenous Arabs below. British Mandate policies after 1922 codified inequality: immigration certificates, land trusts, labor quotas — tools to entrench demographic dominance.

This was no accident. By 1948, Zionism’s design had expelled or driven out over 750,000 Palestinians — return forbidden. Post-1967 expansions entrenched Ben-Gurion’s vision through zoning laws, segregated roads, and biometric checkpoints. The myth of an empty land collapsed decades ago: Ottoman census records, British surveys, and Palestinian memories all confirm Palestine was never terra nullius. Historians Ilan Pappé and Rashid Khalidi document this erasure and displacement exhaustively.

Under international law — U.N. Charter, Fourth Geneva Convention, multiple Security Council resolutions — sovereignty cannot be declared over a people by fiat. Herzl’s “redeemed land” became stolen villages; Ben-Gurion’s “Hebrew labour” yielded unemployment, dependency, and restricted movement. These were not unintended consequences — they were the system working exactly as intended.

Meanwhile, Michael’s slogans are camouflage. When he shouts, he defends not Israeli security but a nineteenth-century settler ideology aimed at erasure. He is not debating; he is drowning dissent. His talking points are not controversial; they are calculated to distract from the colonial machinery at work.

Today, that machinery persists. Settlers seize Palestinian homes while families shop for groceries — shrugging, “If I don’t steal it, someone else will.” They bulldoze villages, torch ancient olive groves, and plant flammable pine trees that fuel wildfires. They fire rockets into Palestinian neighborhoods, barbecue beside apartheid walls as children starve, and loot aid convoys with impunity. Under international law, the entire settlement enterprise is illegal — yet it lives on, funded by the state and protected by Western silence.

Magennis’s British court victory underscored apartheid as infrastructure: dual legal systems, racially gated permits — Herzl’s “redemption” made tangible. But the real question is why Michael’s echoes still reverberate. When people recite bogus slogans instead of naming the root injustice — settler colonialism — they become alibis for genocide.

It is time to unmask this blueprint for what it is: a colonial project built on dispossession, sustained by propaganda, and enforced by violence. Michael is not the argument; he is its alibi. And echoing him only deepens the lie.

VI. The Collapse of the Zionist Narrative

The ground is shifting. Protests surge from Cape Town to Berlin. Politicians who once stood lockstep behind Israel now pause. In a recent YouGov survey, fewer than one in five Europeans views Israel favorably — only 14 percent of Britons side with Israel, while 32 percent side with Palestinians. Fifty-one percent say they can understand the Palestinian viewpoint. The old refrain — “It’s complicated” — no longer holds. Genocide unfolds in real time, and no Holocaust memorial or sacred trauma can justify starving children and mass graves.

For decades, Israel cloaked itself in Shoah memory, wielding victimhood even as it bombed hospitals. That shield is cracking. Grief has catalyzed truth. Miko Peled — whose own niece died in a suicide bombing — rejected the myth that personal loss excuses collective punishment. Raised inside Zionism, he watched it collapse from within:

“The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — the apartheid state established in 1948.”
 ― Miko Peled

Inside Israel, the cracks are material and brutal. By early 2025, more than half of draft-age Israelis refused front-line service — young women citing moral or mental-health exemptions. The IDF quietly suspended its female combat-fitness program. At least two reservists diagnosed with PTSD were killed in Gaza, and rising veteran suicides underscore how demoralizing this war has become. Netanyahu’s coalition nearly dissolved when Haredi partners demanded yeshiva exemptions. Abroad, Canada opened a war-crimes investigation into IDF veterans. Israel’s “united front” has shattered — not just in European opinion polls, but inside Israeli society itself.

The collapse is not rhetorical. In May 2025, Operation Gideon’s Chariots forcibly displaced over 250,000 Palestinians from Jabalia into “humanitarian zones,” deepening a catastrophic crisis. Over 54,000 Palestinians have died — most women and children; thousands remain under rubble; famine is imminent. The ICC has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. Amnesty International, UN rapporteurs, and the ICJ warn: genocide is imminent. This is systematic ethnic cleansing.

Alarm bells ring even within empire’s halls. Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes broke rank on MSNBC:

“Everything I’m hearing from people on the inside is that it is materially worse [in Gaza] over the last few weeks than it has been since October 7th… When people can actually get into Gaza, what they’re going to find is much, much worse than anything that’s been reported.”
 ― Ben Rhodes

Rhodes’s words cut through euphemism: the U.S. holds “ultimate leverage,” yet chooses bombs over ultimatums. This is not diplomacy — it is complicity.

When those who built the wall now denounce its purpose, the collapse is irreversible. In May 2025, Ehud Olmert — former prime minister and architect of settlement expansion — declared:

“This is a war crime… unacceptable, unbearable, and unforgivable.”
 ― Ehud Olmert, Haaretz

Narrative warfare has weaponized memory. Ta-Nehisi Coates, touring the West Bank, calls it “Jim Crow on steroids.” Aaron Maté shreds the “right to exist” imbalance:

“No Israeli is asked: ‘Do you accept Palestine’s right to exist?’ Palestine doesn’t exist yet — it’s actively being destroyed.”
 ― Aaron Maté

Norman Finkelstein condemns the Holocaust industry for deflecting criticism. Ilan Pappé calls the Nakba “an ongoing structure,” and Noam Chomsky labels Israel “an instrument of imperial power.” Behind closed doors, a Hebrew-language investigation by Mechohomitz revealed that, despite publicly dismissing Gaza Health Ministry figures as “Hamas propaganda,” the IDF relies on those very numbers in its own intelligence briefings — exposing how truth is weaponized to muddy international understanding and insulate decision-makers from moral accountability.

Even empire’s scribes see the cracks. In May 2025, Thomas Friedman quoted Olmert again:

“What we’re doing in Gaza is a war of extermination — indiscriminate, cruel, criminal.”
 ― Thomas Friedman, The New York Times

Rising suicides and shattered families underscore a nation haunted by its own actions. This is disintegration, not resilience.

In early June, Hamas offered to withdraw completely from Gaza — an offer Israel refused. As Kyle Kulinski observed:

“BREAKING: ISRAEL REJECTS HAMAS OFFER TO STEP DOWN & LEAVE GAZA! That’s not about security anymore — that’s about conquest.”
 ― Kyle Kulinski, June 2, 2025

If even total withdrawal is refused, then security is not the aim — annexation is. Settlements multiply: 22 new outposts approved, settler‐led pogroms, child imprisonments. Louis Theroux’s The Settlers exposes entitlement:

“If we waited for permission, there’d be no Israel.”
 ― Settler interviewed in The Settlers

Analyst Shahid Bolsen captures the moment:

“Israel isn’t fighting Hamas; it’s fighting reality. Zionism doesn’t do diplomacy — it dominates or disintegrates.”
 — and — 
 “This genocide marks the end of Zionist strategy.”
 ― Shahid Bolsen

The collapse is tangible: mass military refusals, hundreds of thousands emigrating. As Lee Camp summarizes bluntly:

“There’s no military doctrine left — just collapse.”
 ― Lee Camp

This is the end of the Zionist narrative. It is not tragic. It is overdue.

VII. A Vision Beyond Apartheid

This is not a call for revenge — it is a call for justice. True justice demands that no one’s safety be built on another’s oppression. Anti-Zionism, at its core, does not aim to erase a people but to dismantle a system of domination — one where a single ethnic group controls land, water, laws, and roads while millions remain trapped behind walls, checkpoints, rubble, and hunger. As Franck Magennis puts it,

“This is not about dismantling people. It’s about dismantling systems.”

Ending Zionism does not mean ending Jewish life in the region. It means ending apartheid: race-based land laws, dual legal systems, bureaucratic cruelty. It means imagining something unprecedented in historic Palestine — a secular democracy from river to sea, where every adult, regardless of religion or ethnicity, holds one equal vote.

In that democracy, the millions displaced in 1948 and their descendants would finally return home — not just in body, but in dignity. Reparations would be acts of recognition, not transactional settlements. Education would be shaped by truth rather than myth, offering future generations the full story of their land and each other. Justice would cease to be a weapon wielded by the powerful and instead become a path to healing for all who have suffered.

“The only way out of trauma is through truth. The way to heal is not to dominate — but to repair.”
 — Gabor Maté

Miko Peled makes it plain:

“The Palestinians are not the victims. They are the liberators. Because through their resistance, they’re going to liberate all of us from Zionism, and then we can all be free.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

At first glance, this may seem to contradict the unbearable truth: over 14,000 Palestinian children have been killed, and millions starve behind fences. But Peled does not deny their suffering — he honors their agency. His point is not that Palestinians do not suffer, but that they are more than their suffering. To view them only as victims is to reduce them to a humanitarian plea. They are a moral force. In resisting occupation, Palestinians expose empire; in refusing silence, they force the world to choose. That is not pity. That is power.

Liberation, in this vision, is collective. Zionism has not only caged Palestinians — it has trapped Jews in a cycle of fear, militarization, and moral erosion. Freedom for one people cannot come at the cost of another.

“Palestine is an entire country… The apartheid regime drew these borders. The reality is one state — an apartheid state — or the only hopeful alternative: a free, democratic Palestine.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

We have a precedent. South Africa chose truth over amnesia, dignity over domination. Its Truth and Reconciliation Commission did not erase anyone; it confronted atrocities, acknowledged pain, and planted seeds for a multiracial democracy. Imperfect, painful, incomplete — but real. If South Africa could do it, so can Israel-Palestine.

But only if we reject the lie that safety can be built on another’s grave. Only if we choose to believe in something beyond mere survival.

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
 — Desmond Tutu

The time for neutrality has passed. The vision must now be justice.

VIII. Why Is This So Dangerous to Say?

Labeling Gaza’s deliberate starvation and bombardment “genocide” invites immediate censure in much of the West. Calling it “apartheid” risks professional ruin. Criticizing Zionism — even as a political ideology — can lead to social exile, platform bans, or defunding.

In the 2020 U.S. election cycle, pro-Israel interests gave roughly $3.75 million to Joe Biden and $894,000 to Donald Trump, signaling a bipartisan consensus that chills dissent. AIPAC funnels multimillion-dollar campaigns into congressional races, silencing debate rather than fostering it. College presidents resign when pressured to equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism. Peaceful protests are branded “terrorism.” Textbooks erase Palestine. And celebrities like Sharon Osbourne posture as defenders of tolerance while backing organizations that stifle survivors and shield war crimes behind the guise of “fighting hate.” This is not diplomacy — it is ideological enforcement, achieved through fear, not persuasion.

Project Esther & Criminalizing Dissent
 In early 2024, a leaked strategy memo codenamed Project Esther exposed how U.S. power brokers have quietly rebranded pro-Palestine activism as a security threat. Behind closed doors, senior DOJ and intelligence officials argued that anyone protesting Gaza’s siege — whether a nurse handing out water bottles, a software engineer sharing statistics, or a high schooler marching on campus — could be lumped into what they called the “Hamas Support Network (HSN).” In one chilling passage, the memo declares:

“All of the people who have come out to protest the genocide — nurses, software programmers, port workers, teachers, veterans, high schoolers — are part of a global clandestine network to support Hamas. If they had any actual evidence, we’d see it plastered in every newspaper 24/7. But we don’t, because the evidence doesn’t exist.”

From that assumption — pro-Palestine sentiment equals terrorism — Project Esther lays out a blueprint for repression: any campus group, student club, or community organization that fails to expel or discipline its pro-Palestine members risks losing federal funding. Foreign students can have their visas revoked for wearing a keffiyeh or posting a viral TikTok about Gaza; the DOJ is empowered to pursue “material support” charges — long a tool for going after actual terror cells — against anyone who donates to a relief drive or signs a petition. Social-media platforms are told to “deprioritize” posts critical of Israel, recasting a movement for basic human rights as “anti-American extremism.” Local officials, the memo instructs, must be “dissuaded” from granting protest permits if the application hints at solidarity with Gaza. And the paper even suggests that universities and nonprofits could lose entire grant lines unless their leadership actively suppresses any speech that challenges Israel’s policies.

Under Project Esther’s logic, the right to call for an end to starvation becomes indistinguishable from plotting violence. One powerful slide bluntly states:

“The Department of Justice has the right to go after pro-Palestine groups for providing material support for terrorism — punishable by heavy prison sentences, bank-account shutdowns, and asset seizures.”

By equating peaceful dissent with “material support for Hamas,” every petition drive, letter to Congress, or campus teach-in edges toward felony territory. When doctors speak out about blockades that prevent chemotherapy supplies, they risk being branded co-conspirators. When teachers bring a guest speaker to campus to discuss civilian casualties, they run the risk of investigations and career-ending sanctions.

The memo even outlines how to manipulate public perception:

“Cancelling visas for foreign students that support Palestine and withholding federal funds from institutions that don’t enforce anti-Palestinian policies.”
 “Deprioritizing pro-Palestine posts in social-media algorithms; framing the Palestine movement as anti-American; dissuading localities from issuing protest permits; presenting the movement as criminal.”

Criminalizing dissent is nothing new, but Project Esther codifies it as federal policy. Hard-line lobbying groups — backed by hunting-majority donations — have long whispered in lawmakers’ ears: “If you don’t back Israel unequivocally, your campaign is over.” Project Esther simply names that coercion as an enforcement strategy.

In practice, this playbook has real victims. Over 200 foreign students were abruptly told to leave the country in 2024 alone — many after posting innocuous messages of solidarity on Instagram. One Boston-area university temporarily barred a registered nurse from clinical rotations because she signed a campus petition demanding an immediate ceasefire. A small liberal-arts college in the Midwest lost a major federal grant after its president refused to discipline a professor who screened footage of Gaza in his political-science class. Ordinary families — firefighters, postal workers, community-college students — have been hauled before grand juries on the suspicion that a share of a GoFundMe page somehow funded a rocket launch.

The heart of Project Esther is not public safety; it is ideological enforcement by fear. When calling for a ceasefire is recast as terrorism, the boundary between thought and felony vanishes. Once a government can muscle any university, nonprofit, or social-media platform into compliance, any genuine conversation about Palestinian rights becomes impossible.

Project Esther didn’t emerge spontaneously. It echoes tactics from past eras — McCarthyism’s blacklist, the PATRIOT Act’s expanded surveillance — yet its target is not a foreign ideology hidden in the shadows, but Americans exercising their First Amendment rights to protest a distant atrocity. By labeling solidarity as subversion, Project Esther weaponizes language itself: peaceful speech becomes “material support,” campus flyers become “recruitment,” and academic research becomes “terrorist propaganda.”

As long as Project Esther’s templates circulate in the halls of power, every tweet, every rally, every classroom discussion about Gaza carries risk. And that risk silences not only pro-Palestine voices, but anyone who fears guilt by association. When well-trained lawyers, tenured professors, and frontline nurses can be branded enemies of the state for speaking out, true academic freedom and civic participation collapse.

In the face of that, the memo concludes, “Resistance is a nuisance — power demands silence.” The only remedy is to expose the full scope of this blueprint: to show that what Project Esther calls “counter-terrorism” is really a campaign to enforce one state’s narrative at the expense of democratic discourse. Because if we allow peaceful dissent to be treated as criminal, then no peaceful dissent will remain.

These tactics criminalize free speech, chill academic freedom, and brand ordinary dissenters as traitors. When calling for justice is equated with aiding terrorism, the line between thought and felony blurs.

Elites & Public Apathy
 Marcel Ophuls’ The Sorrow and the Pity exposed how elite collaboration and public apathy flourish under national security’s cover: resistance was not honored — it was feared. Today’s pattern repeats. Protesters are labeled extremists; journalists are surveilled or deported. In the U.K., authorities — lobbied by Israeli diplomats — have pressed charges against genocide protesters. Resistance is dismissed as a nuisance; power demands silence.

Weaponizing Language
 Words matter. “Semitic” includes both Jews and Arabs. A campaign of extermination against Palestinians is, by definition, antisemitic. Yet using “antisemitism” to shield state violence against Semitic people is a moral obscenity.

Incompetence & Collapse
 Even the architects of this genocide recoil from its disastrous execution. After Netanyahu’s offhand remark — “We can’t have photos of children starving — not starvation itself” — Aaron Maté observed:

“Starvation was the tipping point — for PR, not humanity.”

Canadian human rights lawyer Dimitri Lascaris added:

“What horrifies me is not just the evil, but the stunning incompetence of this genocidal regime. They couldn’t even pick a compliant puppet to run humanitarian aid — he had a conscience and resigned.”

That resignation punctures the myth, revealing collapse as well as cruelty.

Humanitarianism as Containment
 In a world where naming genocide is punishable, clarity becomes contraband. To call out genocide is to risk being labeled antisemitic, traitorous, or naïve. Aid convoys, artificial corridors, PR campaigns of mercy, and drone footage of bread trucks distract from the core issue: dismantling the apartheid state. As Miko Peled insists:

“That should not be the conversation — humanitarian aid. The conversation should be the liberation and dismantling of the apartheid state — and, of course, dismantling the concentration camp so people are free.”
 “It’s not about getting the genocidal regime to allow humanitarian aid to go into a population they want to kill anyway… That only makes things worse.”

Food trucks offer moral cover, not moral clarity. The more precise the dissent, the harsher the punishment. The real threat to empire isn’t resistance — it’s articulation. To say this aloud is to risk everything.

Holocaust Memory & Genocide Denial
 By wrapping Israeli violence in Holocaust imagery — flying the Star of David over bombed hospitals, invoking “Never again” to justify siege warfare — Israel collapses Judaism’s moral authority into a militarized ethnonational state. That fuels real antisemitism and endangers Jews worldwide. It is genocidal against Palestinians and antisemitic in the backlash against dissenting Jews.

At a Toronto fundraiser for the Abraham Global Peace Initiative, Israeli ambassador Gilad Erdan lit candles on a birthday cake and declared:

“We will wear yellow stars until you condemn the atrocities of Hamas.”

Days later, in an i24 interview, he proclaimed:

“The UN building should be wiped off the face of the earth.”

This was not satire. It was diplomatic theater — desecrating Jewish trauma to rationalize Palestinian annihilation. The yellow star, meant to mark Jewish victimhood, was twisted into a costume of moral superiority. That he could call for the erasure of the UN while Israel bombed UN schools, warehouses, and shelters — killing hundreds of staff — makes the symbolism not only grotesque but genocidal.

Global Enforcement & Soft Fascism
 Across the Global North, dissent is punished. In the U.K., children are suspended for wearing keffiyehs. In Germany, lectures on Palestinian suffering prompt investigations. In France, pro-Palestinian marches are banned. Criticize Israel, and you become the threat.

Meanwhile, Zionist militias operate with legal protection and charitable status. As Samira Moyed reports:

“Magen Herut, a vigilante Zionist organization operating on Canadian campuses and protests, takes its name from a Zionist terror group — and it holds charitable status with the Canada Revenue Agency.”

This is not grassroots activism — it is empire outsourced. Palestinian students lose scholarships for keffiyehs; Zionist enforcers intimidate protesters under the banner of “community defense.” Canadian institutions don’t just ignore this — they endorse it. This is how soft fascism gets subsidized.

Immigration Litmus Tests
 The Abraham Global Peace Initiative publicly calls itself a peace group, but functions as ideological enforcement. Moyed continues:

“The Abraham Global Peace Initiative is a Zionist lobby group with charitable status… fronted by a man who uses Holocaust trauma to criminalize dissent. They want a Canadian ‘values test’ requiring immigrants to affirm Israel’s right to exist.”

This is not immigration vetting — it is ideological litmus. Requiring fealty to an apartheid state as a condition of citizenship turns genocide denial into national identity. It is not democracy. It is dogma.

Commencement Censorship & Academic Repression
 In May 2025, NYU valedictorian Logan Rozos told his graduating class:

“I want to say that the genocide currently occurring is supported politically and militarily by the United States, is paid for by our tax dollars, and has been livestreamed to our phones for the past 18 months… I condemn this genocide and complicity in this genocide.”

The audience rose in applause. NYU withheld his diploma, accusing him of “lying” in his prepared remarks and “abusing a privilege.” The Anti-Defamation League praised the punishment. The livestream vanished.

Two weeks earlier, MIT graduate Megha Vemuri closed her commencement by acknowledging Palestinians and quoting Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., affirming her commitment to justice. MIT cut her mic and later apologized — not to her, but to donors and attendees who felt “discomfort.”

This is not free speech. It is ideological policing.

Under Donald Trump’s 2025 executive pressure campaign, the U.S. Department of Education threatened elite institutions — Harvard, Columbia, and others — with federal investigations and funding cuts if they failed to suppress anti-Zionist activism. Republican lawmakers echoed the message: equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism, or else. Universities folded; students were suspended; police were summoned to shut down tents and voices. This is not education — it is compliance masquerading as order.

In a country that celebrates dissent overseas, the reality at home is stark: say “Free Palestine,” and you risk losing your degree, your job, your bank account. The First Amendment applies — but selectively. The victims of power are not always invited to speak.

Victimhood Weaponized
 In April 2025, a viral TikTok showed Zionist influencer Lizzy Savetsky berating an Arab taxi driver for antisemitism — without cause. Jewish commentator Matt Bernstein explained:

“Jews occupy so many powerful positions… it’s embarrassing to say we’re persecuted.”

He challenged how antisemitism is weaponized — not denying real hatred, but exposing its use to silence truth. When privilege cloaks itself in eternal victimhood, history becomes a tool to suppress dissent. The result is not safety but impunity.

This weaponization is structural and strategic — and sometimes staged. In 2019, a Winnipeg kosher café reported a violent antisemitic attack that police later revealed was a hoax staged by the owners themselves. False claims weaponize real suffering, corroding trust and delegitimizing genuine cries for justice.

Shahid Bolsen sees through the charade:

“You’re not censored because you’re wrong. You’re censored because you’re a threat to power.”

The more precise the truth, the harsher the suppression. The West fears losing control of the story that stabilizes empire.

Cracks in the Silence
 Voices are beginning to push back. On The Greyzone, Daniel Maté — son of trauma expert Dr. Gabor Maté — challenged the label “antisemitic” in describing a 2025 D.C. shooting of Israeli officials:

“I read the manifesto. I couldn’t find antisemitism. He was upset by the Gaza genocide.”

Journalist Max Blumenthal agreed: conflating a militarized settler state with Jewish identity recasts dissent as hate, stripping context from retaliation. One victim, Yaron Lischinsky, wasn’t strictly Jewish but a self-identified Christian Zionist who openly glorified Israeli military violence on social media — an unsettling reminder that some supporters see prophecy, not policy.

This is not diplomacy. It is death-cult politics masquerading as foreign policy. When bombs become blessings, atrocity is salvation. This is annihilation, not strategy. The bipartisan machinery enabling apartheid and genocide cannot claim moral high ground. It will collapse under its delusions. We witness not isolated crises but empire’s unraveling.

Cultural Figures Speak Out
 In May 2025, over 300 UK cultural icons — including Dua Lipa, Benedict Cumberbatch, Riz Ahmed, and Tilda Swinton — signed a letter demanding an end to arms sales to Israel:

“You can’t call it intolerable and keep sending arms.”

When pop royalty adopts genocide’s legal language, rupture is real.

Preparing for Reckoning
 British Muslim sociologist Dr. Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui vowed:

“One day, I’ll teach Nazism and Zionism together. Students will ask how the world stayed silent with video evidence.”
 “Are you one of them?”

The truth endures. Over 14,000 Palestinian children have died in Gaza since October 2023 — more than in all other global conflicts combined. Gaza has the highest per-capita child-amputee rate worldwide. Over 100 journalists, mostly Palestinian, have died. Hospitals lie in ruins; aid workers lie buried. In the West, losing a job is tragedy; in Gaza, losing a child to an airstrike is daily horror. Yet the former is weaponized to silence outrage over the latter.

Miko Peled puts it plainly:

“You don’t get to judge the people you’re helping cage, starve, and bomb — especially when your taxes pay for it.”

This is dangerous not because it is false, but because it is true. Once people grasp that Zionism does not shield but generates violence, they ask harder questions. They see their own cities, police, and surveillance mirrored in Palestine.

Malcolm X foresaw this in 1964:

“The Palestinian struggle is not just a cry for justice — it’s a blistering battle for the most fundamental human rights… If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the oppressors.”

The Palestinian struggle is no exception; it is the mirror. As Ta-Nehisi Coates observes:

“I’ve never felt racism’s glare more intensely than in Israel. Once you see the system — violence disguised as order, humanity erased — you can never unsee it.”

Calling genocide and apartheid by their names is dangerous precisely because it reveals uncomfortable truths — and empire fears those truths more than anything else.

IX. The Comment Section Is the Crime Scene
 How Genocide Is Normalized in Plain Sight
 Genocide doesn’t begin with bombs. It begins with words — anonymous avatars, coworkers, neighbors posting in comment threads. A woman named Katalina insists that calling Zionism “colonization” is like accusing someone of “trespassing on their own front porch.” A man named Gee Miller replies to a plea for Palestinian rights: “It’s time to disappear them from the neighborhood. Simple, like you. Did I type slow enough for you?” This isn’t satire, and it isn’t rare. It is the banal, unfiltered voice of genocide, thriving in plain sight.

Genocidal systems rely first on myths — and myths need messengers. In comment threads across social media, you see the same refrains over and over:

• Erasure as fact: “There never was a Palestine.”
• Elimination as defense: “Just level Gaza.”
• Victimhood as shield: “How dare you compare this to the Holocaust.”
• Gaslighting as logic: “If Israel wanted genocide, there’d be no Gazans left.”
• Dehumanization as humor: “Let them live in tents. That’s what they’re used to.”
• Dissent as threat: “If you support Palestine, you support terrorism.”

These comments are not mere noise. They are evidence of how normalizing hate lays the tracks for mass violence. When historians ask how so many watched children starve, the answer will be found not only in military orders but in threads like these — mockery presented as truth, hashtags echoing with dehumanizing clichés, and a chorus of silence. We save these screenshots not to debate but to remember. They are not anomalies; they are mirrors. In them, we see a society that would rather mock the dying than admit its silence helped kill them.

Anatomy of a Facebook Rant
 Below is a longer, actual Facebook post from a friend of Michael’s — one who trolls pro-Palestine and human-rights groups. Its content typifies what torrents through comment threads every day on every platform:

“Think of the true meaning of genocide. The Islamists and their far-Left ‘useful idiots’ at demos chant loudly about destroying the Jewish race. That is genocide. The Palestinians are Arabs, but there is not an actual Palestinian race. There are many countries where people suffer from war and famine. Our far Left doesn’t care about these people; all their hate is directed at Israel. Why? Because of antisemitism. They are guilty of racism, which is another thing they claim to despise, but are guilty of themselves. In Britain and the rest of the West, Islamic terrorism kills many people, including young children. The hypocrisy of the far Left is sickening. Many of you claim to care about the rights of women, gays, and animals, and yet you adore radical Islamism, which despises all three. How many of you would survive in a Muslim country? The Islamists are just using you deluded racists to gain power. Should these monsters take over, many of you would be executed. I support the Jews, as they are good citizens here, and I support Israel as the last bastion of human and animal freedom in the Middle East, a tiny country surrounded by Islamic hellholes. I support the people who have the same values as myself, and as a vegan, I support the vegan capital of the world: Israel. I am appalled that so many vegans support those who hate animals, especially dogs, our best friends. It’s such sickening hypocrisy. All of you Jew-haters should ask yourself why you feel like this, and remember what happened in WWII, when antisemitism ran riot. We have about six million Muslims here and only about thirty thousand Jews. I would feel so much happier — and a hell of a lot safer — if it was the other way round.”

Below each segment, the comment is quoted or paraphrased and then calmly dissected to show how it mirrors — and amplifies — all the misdirections we catalog throughout this essay.

1. “Think of the true meaning of genocide. The Islamists and their far-Left ‘useful idiots’ at demos chant loudly about destroying the Jewish race. That is genocide.”

• Reality: Genocide has a precise legal definition: intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a protected national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Incitement to murder Jews is reprehensible and must be condemned. But equating a handful of fringe chants with a state’s policy of systematic civilian annihilation is a false equivalence. In Gaza, under siege, over 50 000 children have been killed — the result of a concerted military strategy, not isolated slogans at a protest. Collapsing “some extremist chants” with “Israel’s entire military strategy” misleads readers and trivializes genuine genocidal intent.

1. “The Palestinians are Arabs, but there is not an actual Palestinian race.”

• Reality: Denying that Palestinians constitute a protected group ignores how genocide law protects any ethno-national population — race, ethnicity, or nationality. Palestinians share language, history, culture, and the legacy of displacement dating to 1948. They were recognized as a distinct people by the PLO in 1964 and granted UN observer status in 2012. Erasing their identity reduces a century of collective experience to a footnote — and makes it easier to deny them rights and protections.

1. “There are many places where people suffer war and famine. Our far Left doesn’t care; all their hate is directed at Israel. Why? Because of antisemitism. They are guilty of racism.”

• Reality: This is cherry-picking and a false dilemma. Some activists focus on Gaza, but countless others simultaneously oppose injustices in Sudan, Yemen, Ukraine, Haiti, and beyond. Many on the Left campaign for multiple causes — supporting Palestinian refugees, protesting famine in Yemen, and denouncing Russian aggression. Conflating all criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism erases nuance. Groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow explicitly condemn antisemitism while opposing occupation — but that complexity is flattened into a toxic accusation.

1. “In Britain and the West, Islamic terrorism kills many people, including young children. The hypocrisy of the far Left is sickening.”

• Reality: Equating “Islamic terrorism” with every Muslim or every Palestinian is a sweeping generalization and an appeal to fear. Over 95 percent of Muslim-majority countries record zero jihadi attacks in a given year. Most Western Muslims condemn terrorism as vehemently as anyone else. By painting “Islamists” as a monolithic threat, the comment stokes Islamophobia and diverts attention from the fact that Israel’s blockade and bombardment — financed by Western taxpayers — are state policies causing mass civilian death.

1. “Many of you claim to care about women, gays, and animals, yet you adore radical Islamism, which despises them.”

• Reality: This is guilt by association and black-and-white thinking. Equating any pro-Palestinian stance with “adoring radical Islamism” ignores nuance. Millions of Palestinians — women’s-rights activists, LGBTQ+ advocates — resist occupation because Israeli policies oppress them. Conflating them with jihadist groups like ISIS erects a straw man. Dissenters do not chant “Allahu akbar, kill the gays”; they demand freedom from siege, checkpoints, home demolitions — policies that harm women, LGBTQ+ people, and animals in Gaza just as severely as any human rights abuses in Tel Aviv.

1. “How many of you would survive in a Muslim country? The Islamists use you deluded racists to gain power. Should these monsters take over, many of you would be executed.”

• Reality: This is an appeal to fear and another straw man. Suggesting that “living in a Muslim country” means certain execution is a scare tactic without factual basis. Countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, Jordan, and Tunisia have vibrant civil societies, women’s rights campaigns, and LGBTQ+ activism. Painting every Islamic state as a death cult erases that reality. Implying, “many of you would be executed” forecloses honest debate by stoking panic.

1. “I support the Jews, as they are good citizens here, and I support Israel as the last bastion of human and animal freedom in the Middle East, a tiny country surrounded by Islamic hellholes.”

• Reality: This is a faulty analogy and a false cause. Preferring vegan cafés in Tel Aviv does not prove that Israel’s entire policy framework is moral. Human-rights NGOs like B’Tselem and Yesh Din document forced displacement, segregated roads, and legal discrimination codified in the 2018 Nation-State Law. Meanwhile, several “Islamic” nations — Lebanon, Tunisia, Morocco — boast free presses, female parliamentarians, and progressive animal-welfare laws. Labeling them all “Islamic hellholes” and elevating Israel as the sole “bastion” is an overgeneralization that blinds readers to both Israeli abuses and reform efforts in Arab states.

1. “I am a vegan — so I support Israel, the vegan capital of the world.”

• Reality: This is a non sequitur and false equivalence. Preferring hummus or falafel has no bearing on endorsing state policy that starves over two million people in Gaza. Gaza’s farmers watch olive groves bulldozed; livestock die from lack of water and veterinary care. Reducing moral judgment to restaurant menus — “My diet choice → My political endorsement” — ignores the fact that Palestinians are being starved alongside any domestic livestock. A vegan ethos offers no shelter from complicity in genocide.

1. “All you Jew-haters… remember WWII — six million Muslims here and only about thirty thousand Jews. I’d feel so much happier, and a hell of a lot safer, if it was the other way around.”

• Reality: This is an ad hominem attack and an appeal to prejudice. Labeling anyone who criticizes Israeli policy a “Jew-hater” is a personal assault rather than an engagement with their argument. Declaring “I’d feel safer with fewer Muslims” mirrors Holocaust-era scapegoating and revives the same logic that undergirds genocide. Data show far more right-wing violence in Europe and the U.S. than jihadi terror. Collective condemnation of an entire faith community is a sweeping generalization that fuels Islamophobia.

Summing Up the Fallacies
 By arraying these nine sections, we see the full spectrum of common logical fallacies used to normalize genocide:

• Straw Man & False Equivalence: Conflating fringe chants with state-backed annihilation; claiming vegan restaurants prove moral governance.
• Begging the Question & Hasty Generalization: “Palestinians aren’t a race, so genocide law doesn’t apply”; “All Muslims are terrorists.”
• False Dilemma & Black-and-White Thinking: “Either you support Israel wholly or you support terrorism”; “If you’re pro-Gaza, you ignore every other crisis.”
• Cherry Picking & False Cause: Highlighting one crisis to claim the Left cares only about Gaza; “Israel is vegan → therefore Israel is just.”
• Slippery Slope & Appeal to Fear: “Criticize Israel → radical Islamists will kill you”; “Pro-Palestine → you secretly adore jihad.”
• Non Sequitur: “My vegan diet → My political endorsement of Israeli policy”; “I love Tel Aviv bars → I’m morally right about Gaza.”
• Ad Hominem & Appeal to Prejudice: “If you criticize, you’re a Jew-hater”; “More Muslims = less safety.”
• Red Herring: Distracting from Gaza’s siege by invoking “Islamic terrorism”; shifting debate to falafel rather than hospitals.

Each tactic twists language into weapons, making it easier to rationalize systematic violence.

Why This Matters
 Supremacy hides in plain sight. The commenter demands impunity for Israel’s blockade, starvation, and bombardment — policies that systematically destroy lives — while labeling any dissent as “anti-Jewish” or “radical extremism.” Silencing works by invoking fear. Calling critics “anti-Semites,” “useful idiots,” or “terrorists” chills speech. Students are expelled for wearing keffiyehs; professors investigated for quoting the International Court of Justice; pro-Palestine rallies face intimidation by Zionist vigilantes operating under charitable cover.

Comments are not collateral; they are evidence. When tomorrow’s historians ask how the world watched Gaza’s children starve, they will find record after record of these fallacies: denial, erasure, dehumanization, silencing, and drown-out. We save these screenshots not to argue, but to remember. Not as anomalies, but as mirrors. In their reflection, we see a society that would rather mock the dying than admit its silence helped kill them.

IX. The Blueprint of Genocide and Apartheid: How History Repeats — and How It Ends

We are told: “Never again.” Yet again, it happens. Weapons change. Borders shift. Bodies pile up — and the world feigns surprise.

Genocide doesn’t begin with bombs. It begins with excuses, euphemisms, paperwork, and silence.

Earlier, we traced how European powers fractured the Arab world and installed Zionism — not as justice but as leverage. Now, we zoom out. The violence in Gaza is no anomaly; it is the latest expression of a global pattern. What if the real problem is not simply that genocide recurs, but that we have built a world where it is allowed?

Every genocide begins with a story of necessity, a pretext of self-defense. Victims become threats. In 1939, Adolf Hitler infamously asked, “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” It wasn’t a genuine question but a warning: silence grants permission, and impunity invites repetition.

Raphael Lemkin, the Polish lawyer who coined “genocide,” understood this intimately. He wrote, “I became interested in genocide because it has happened so many times — and the criminals guilty of it were not punished.” Lemkin knew that impunity is genocide’s oxygen.

The blueprint spans continents and centuries:

• The Americas: The Doctrine of Discovery justified extermination under settler colonialism. Thanksgiving mythology masked massacres; treaties became tools of dispossession.
• Africa: Black lives were commodified and enslaved, fortifying empires on racial capitalism.
• Nazi Germany: The Holocaust refined this logic. Hitler praised America’s conquest of Indigenous nations and saw silence over the Armenian genocide as license for his own atrocities.

In 1948, Zionist militias expelled over 750,000 Palestinians — not a side effect, but by design. Primo Levi warned, “Everyone has their Jews. For the Israelis, they are the Palestinians.” This was not a betrayal of memory but a replication of oppression upon a new people.

By mid-2025, the same logic reappeared in Western Sahara. Britain and France declared Morocco’s autonomy plan “the best chance” for resolving a long-standing dispute. When two permanent Security Council members endorse “autonomy” under Moroccan rule, they all but abandon the Sahrawi people to decisions made in Rabat and Washington, not Laâyoune or Smara. Following Washington’s recognition of Morocco’s sovereignty, millions of Sahrawis were reduced to bargaining chips. A superpower redefined borders with a policy memo — a modern annexation.

Today, the logic repeats in Gaza. Over 60 percent of Gaza’s Palestinians lack documents proving ownership. Israeli airstrikes obliterated the Palestinian Land Authority office, erasing cadastral data, maps, and title deeds. As TRT World notes, “The widespread loss of homes, boundaries, and official records makes it nearly impossible for Palestinians to prove ownership — and easier for Israel to annex what remains.”

Genocide doesn’t always announce itself with bombs. Sometimes it arrives via bureaucracy. First they flatten your home. Then they erase your right to it. Legal erasure follows physical destruction. This is not postwar cleanup — it is a digital Nakba unfolding before the world.

South African Apartheid mirrored this pattern: race laws, segregated economies, movement controls. Nelson Mandela declared, “Our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” Archbishop Desmond Tutu observed, “The parallels to my own South Africa are painfully stark.”

Rwanda’s genocide killed nearly a million Tutsis in just 100 days while leaders hesitated to call it “genocide” until rivers ran red. In Darfur, villages burned, women were raped, and civilians were erased amid indifferent press releases. Mukesh Kapila grimly noted, “The only difference between Rwanda and Darfur now is the numbers.”

These atrocities are not disconnected but part of a system, a cycle. It always begins the same way: a people framed as a problem; their destruction reframed as stability. Then come the permits, the walls, the graves.

Marcel Ophuls, in The Sorrow and the Pity, shattered myths of heroic resistance in Vichy France: “Resistance fighters were isolated… considered a nuisance. The French elite, especially, had no problem with Nazi occupation.” Today in London, Paris, Berlin, and Washington, those exposing genocide’s machinery are smeared, investigated, and sometimes jailed. Collaborators thrive; resisters suffer. “National security” masks the logic of annihilation.

Narrative Warfare and Weaponized Memory

“Israeli media amplified false atrocity claims — like babies murdered in a nursery and hanged on laundry lines — despite local denials.”

“Fabricated stories were used to desensitize Western audiences, justifying massive civilian casualties in Gaza.”

“Even Holocaust survivors were falsely reported killed, highlighting how propaganda exploited emotional resonance.”

When a state conflates dissent with terrorism and weaponizes unverified tales of brutality, democracies surrender their capacity for critical scrutiny. Ordinary citizens become complicit in atrocities. Vigilant journalism, transparent reporting, and relentless skepticism are the only bulwarks against the next wave of mass-consensus lies that can so easily unleash unspeakable carnage.

Miko Peled, who has lived on both sides of the conflict, makes it simple: “Open the definition of genocide. Compare it to what Palestinians have faced since 1948 — you’ll see it checks almost every box.” Why won’t the West name it? Because doing so would force reckoning — not only with Israel, but with the system that armed, funded, and defended it.

Norman Finkelstein was among the first to say the quiet part aloud: “For a hermetically sealed population, that’s genocide.” When Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced, “No food, fuel, water or electricity,” he wasn’t issuing policy — he was declaring extermination. That is not war. That is intent.

Finkelstein explained the strategy bluntly: “The goal of Israel was to solve the Gaza question through three methods: ethnic cleansing, making Gaza unlivable, and mass death and destruction.” This is not speculative; it’s logistical. The destruction of 90 percent of Gaza’s housing, half its hospitals, and half its farmland is not random — it is design.

And his final warning, perhaps the most chilling: “It’s the final stage of the final solution.” These are not careless words. Finkelstein, son of Holocaust survivors, does not deal in metaphor. He is sounding the alarm — and still, many remain silent.

Narrative Warfare and Weaponized Aid

Genocide in Gaza is not only waged with bombs — it is maintained with bread, branding, and bandwidth.

Cindy McCain, head of the World Food Programme, condemned the Israeli blockade plainly: “We need the Israelis to let us in so we can do our job… We are the best at what we do.” Her frustration was not about logistics; it was about siege. The U.S. — Israel’s main supplier — blocks aid under the guise of negotiation while starvation becomes a weapon.

Aaron Maté exposes a darker manipulation: “Israel is trying to use this fake aid group… to push Palestinians to the south so it can carry out ethnic cleansing.” This is not humanitarianism; it is strategic displacement, masked as mercy.

Comedian Lee Camp strips the charade to the bone: “The system we live under doesn’t just allow genocide — it funds it, supplies it, and then sends aid to hide the evidence.” When the mask slips, media becomes the second front.

Kei Pritsker reported, “Israel is paying influencers in the U.S. to spread its propaganda… Spamming people with canned talking points isn’t going to change that.” These are not rhetorical flourishes; they are forensic insights — proof that today’s wars are waged both on the ground and in the cloud.

Shahid Bolsen’s analysis cuts deep. Labeled a “radical,” Bolsen refuses moral pleas and instead exposes the operating system: “Zionism, and the empire that sustains it, was designed to expand. When expansion becomes impossible, they start burning everything.” His conclusion: “Genocide isn’t a glitch — it’s a feature. It’s not a failure of the system. It is the system.”

Why did the Holocaust lead to a state, while Indigenous genocide, African enslavement, and the Armenian massacre did not? Because power chooses legacies. Palestinians got a flag without land, a vote without borders, and a “peace process” designed to stall. Today’s genocide may lack gas chambers — it looks like checkpoints, starvation, rubble, and red tape.

My granddaughter Naomi was born in China. She will never grow up under a colonial flag. No foreign power will redraw her rivers or rename her borders. China was carved, humiliated, nearly erased — but refused to die. Now she inherits sovereignty: imperfect, but self-determined. Let her be strong yet kind, rooted in memory, not vengeance. Let her walk a world no longer ruled by old victors whose “history” was empire’s story. If those empires tremble, let them. Because this time, history is not ending. It is being rewritten. And maybe Naomi will help write the next chapter.

X. China and the Global South: Diplomacy of Principle
 To grasp today’s diplomacy, we must confront the chasm between United Nations ideals and the imperial machinery that undermines them. In the General Assembly — where all 193 member states vote — Palestine won “non-member observer state” status in 2012 by 138 to 9. Resolutions condemning Israel’s Gaza siege and demanding humanitarian pauses routinely pass with over 150 votes. Yet in the Security Council, one permanent “no” overrides the will of nearly the entire planet. Since 2009, the United States alone has vetoed more than twenty resolutions blocking cease-fires, rights inquiries, and ICC referrals. Global consensus is sacrificed to the ambitions of five.

In that justice vacuum, China and the wider Global South offer a counter-vision: not empire, but principle. When Beijing formally recognized Palestine in January 2024, it signaled a break from the prevailing script. By October, China convened fourteen Palestinian factions — including rival wings of Hamas and Fatah — for the first time in years. That wasn’t mere symbolism; it repudiated Western “strategic ambiguity” and insisted negotiations include all parties, not just Washington’s chosen few.

Beijing’s rhetoric has sometimes matched action. China’s Foreign Ministry invoked the Geneva Conventions: “Civilians should never be targeted, and humanitarian access must never be denied.” More than $70 million in emergency Gaza aid followed, alongside Chinese demands at the UN for independent war-crimes investigations. China affirms that occupation and apartheid cannot confer immunity.

Yet even China’s policy is riddled with contradictions. State-owned Adama supplies agricultural technology to settlers, funds scholarships for illegal Hebron outposts, and sells herbicides to military contractors. Chinese firms build roads in Beit El and install factories near Hebron — literally propping up occupation infrastructure. These aren’t mistakes. They are deliberate, realpolitik choices.

As economist Richard Wolff observes, China’s rise is “faster-growing than any seen before.” Its hybrid approach — blending moral posturing with economic ambition — tests whether true clarity can survive entanglement with profit. Shanghai International Port Group’s recent approval to double Haifa’s Bay Port capacity, just 1.8 km from Israel’s naval base, exemplifies that tension. Western intelligence warns of surveillance risks and potential sabotage at a port once celebrated for trade. Today, it sits at the crossroads of espionage.

Voices from the frontlines insist that principle cannot be sacrificed. Israel’s grandson-turned-dissident Miko Peled lays it bare:

“The way you fight for every life is by ending the source of suffering — the apartheid state founded by Zionists in 1948.”

Peled doesn’t ask Palestinians to disarm; he demands the world stop defending their oppressors.

Canadian lawyer Dimitri Lascaris issues a stark warning:

“They want Israel to complete genocide. Losing this region means losing Western hegemony. Gaza is the frontline of that war.”

Meanwhile, former IDF sergeant Shahid Bolsen — branded “radical” for refusing empire’s script — warns that Gaza is not merely a tragedy but a template:

“The West cannot allow Israel to lose because that would symbolize their strategic model’s collapse. Israel isn’t rogue; it’s a prototype. What’s tested on Palestinians is meant for export.”

He catalogs how surveillance towers, crowd-control drones, and predictive-policing algorithms first honed in Gaza now patrol U.S. borders. Bolsen reminds us that genocide is enforced not only by bombs but by controlling what we may say:

“Genocide is enforced not only by bombs but by epistemic control — narrowing speech, criminalizing knowledge.”

Gaza is a message as much as a massacre.

And yet, while many in the Global South speak, only Yemen acts. In early June 2025, Houthi spokesman Saif AbuKeshek declared:

“Gaza, for us, is the last stand of humanity.”

That proclamation, made on the eve of the Global March to Gaza, distilled the ethical clarity missing from so many capitals. AbuKeshek’s words joined a swelling chorus from Tunisia, Spain, Brazil, and beyond — young, decentralized, transnational. They do not ask the UN for permission; they mobilize.

Rooted in Shia resistance theology and a legacy of anti-imperial defiance, Yemen’s Ansar Allah long linked Palestinian liberation to fighting foreign domination. In June 2025, battered by blockade and airstrikes, Yemen launched missiles, closed Ben Gurion Airport, halted container ships bound for Haifa, and declared Israeli flight paths into Yemeni airspace “legitimate targets.” The poorest country in the region — dismissed as a “Houthi wasteland” — suddenly disrupted the military and commercial heartbeat of a nuclearized state.

“The poorest country in the Arab world just did what the richest nations won’t: stand up to genocide.”
 -–YouTube narration, Mahmood OD Channel, June 2025

The cost is immense; the choice is clear. While diplomats tweet, the Houthis blockade. While monarchs receive handshakes, rebels in sandals make Israel’s skies unsafe. If resistance were measured in sacrifice, Yemen would be rich.

And it is not only fighters who resist. In Paris, mathematician Michel Broué hosts free Zoom lectures for Gaza’s students under siege. Offering knowledge when bombs fall, he explains:

“There is no such thing as pity. Respect is the first thing.”

Broué’s solidarity is not charity; it is mutual recognition of dignity — a form of rebellion against erasure.

The Global South may not speak UN jargon, but its people grasp dignity’s urgency. As this is written, the Global March to Gaza — slated for June 15, 2025 — feels less like another protest and more like a tectonic shift. Organized in Egypt and echoed from Tunisia to Spain, Yemen to India, it represents a rare phenomenon: coordinated, grassroots, transnational refusal.

This is not simply a march to Gaza. It is a march against genocide. Whether it breaks the siege or is crushed by it, the world is watching. And in a future edition, we may say: this was the turning point — when humanity remembered itself.

Sidebar: Arab Normalization and Domestic Repression
 Normalization between Arab states and Israel is not diplomacy; it is betrayal disguised as handshake. As Dr. Maha Azzam observes:

“Arab normalization with Israel is not peace — it’s survival for dictatorships built on repression. By siding with Israel, these regimes abandon anti-colonial principles and embrace the structures of domination the Global South claims to reject.”

Consider Egypt, often lauded as a regional anchor. As Azzam warns:

“Fear is immense — over 100,000 people in prison: 80,000 political prisoners, 40,000 pretrial detainees — about 116 imprisoned per 1,000 population. Indefinite detentions, disappearances, executions: that barrier of fear must be broken.”

A state that perfects occupation tactics at home cannot mobilize for justice abroad. While its security services crush pro-Palestinian marches, Cairo signs “strategic cooperation” agreements with Israel. Fear becomes foreign policy.

Historic peace deals expose this lopsided logic. Reflecting on Camp David, Azzam notes:

“Sadat’s 1978 surrender returned Sinai as a demilitarized zone where Israel retains freedom of maneuver. Egypt gained little. It was a ‘cold peace’ under Mubarak that served Israel first and foremost.”

Camp David was not a victory — it was a velvet leash. Egypt accepted nominal sovereignty while Israeli control persisted. That model has proliferated across the region: sacrifice resistance, accept foreign aid, stay silent. When peace is brokered on colonial terms, it is not peace but prolonged subjugation.

In today’s world, that “cold peace” stands as a warning: concessions don’t guarantee justice, only less obvious forms of domination.

XI. They Have Friends Everywhere: Youth, Rebellion, and the Collapse of Official Truth

“You don’t need all of them. Just enough to shake the ground.”
 — Andor

The empire crumbles not from on high but from below — in streets, on campuses, through glowing screens. In Gaza, children die. On university quads, tents rise. Protesters chant dignity, not revenge.

When 19-year-old Gazan TikTok vlogger Mohammad “Medo” Halimy was killed in an airstrike, 40,000 people mourned online. In his videos — planting mint in a refugee camp, sharing jokes beneath drone shadows — Medo insisted, “Planting is resistance… They take life, I bring it to earth.” At the University of Minnesota, students renamed a building Halimy Hall — a bold reminder that Gaza’s children are more than statistics; they are friends, heroes, seeds of hope. A campus slogan captures that spirit:
 “If you bomb a watermelon, you only scatter its seeds.”

Where politicians equivocate, youth speak with clarity:
 “This is not about Hamas. This is about protecting Palestinian lives.”
 Where mainstream media softens every headline, activists sharpen it:
 “There is only one side to genocide.”
 And when universities threaten expulsion, students persist:
 “Risking futures to defend Palestinian rights means standing on the right side of history.”

Across continents, this generational rupture grows. A UK student who walked out of class declared, “It shattered my understanding of democracy and free speech.” Another wrote in The Guardian, “These activists are the conscience sadly missing in their president.” While elders bankrolled by lobby cash recycle talking points, youth stream Gaza’s devastation live — raw, unedited, unignorable.

In Canberra on March 26, 2025, Australian MP Kat McNamara stood before parliament, visibly shaken. She described scrolling through Instagram late at night, haunted by “images of little Palestinian babies mutilated, their feet poking out of the rubble.” In that moment, the safe distance between “us” and “them” dissolved: her baby slept beside her, while elsewhere, infants lay lifeless in concrete tombs. She described “men weeping over the wrapped bodies of children — small cloth bundles the brain cannot process.” Her tears became a flash of moral clarity: you cannot look away when a fellow parent’s worst nightmare plays in your own home. McNamara’s on-camera breakdown went viral, sparking solidarity from human-rights groups even as pro-Israel lobbyists accused her of “politicizing” parliament. It felt like a crack in the wall — a bellwether moment when witnessing became an act of resistance.

At Cambridge, students re-encamped outside Trinity College, demanding divestment from Elbit Systems and L3Harris. Their declaration was unflinching:
 “We call on the University to end its moral and material complicity in Israel’s genocide of Palestinians. Trinity invests millions in Elbit and BAE — arms manufacturers complicit in occupation. If King’s College can divest, so can every college.”
 When Trinity served an injunction to clear the tents, protesters responded:
 “Trinity can serve an injunction all it wants, and Israel can bomb every square inch of Gaza, but there will always be Gazawi left to exist and to resist colonial occupation.”
 Their defiance reminds us that repression cannot erase solidarity.

Some resistance finds heft in laughter. In Netflix’s Mo Amer: Mohammed in Texas, Palestinian-American comedian Mo Amer wields humor as protest. “When people hear ‘Palestinian,’ I want them to think of me. Not a terrorist. Not a victim. Just… a guy. A refugee with anxiety,” he says. By existing onscreen as funny, flawed, and human, Mo undermines decades of dehumanization. While Yemen launches missiles and students raise banners, Mo fights with punchlines. His joy is subversion — proof that truth survives even when bomb craters surround you.

Not all rebels come from refugee camps or protest tents — some wear Imperial uniforms on screen but carry blasters for justice in real life. Denise Gough — known to TV audiences as the icy Dedra Meero in Andor — has become a real-world dissident. After October 7, she immersed herself in Palestinian history: reading Voices from Gaza, watching Ambulance, studying Edward Said and Gabor Maté. “I don’t have kids,” she says. “In twenty years, it won’t be them asking what I did. It will be me, looking at myself in the mirror.” Gough speaks of fear and anxiety, but also of responsibility:
 “We were asked by people of color during Black Lives Matter to educate ourselves — and we did. Now Palestinians are asking the same.”
 Her rebellion is both personal and public: to risk industry exile for an idea larger than any paycheck. She refuses to let silence be complicity.

And then there’s Greta Thunberg. In May 2025, the first flotilla she backed — the Conscience — was bombed by Israeli drones in international waters. When Greta boarded that aid vessel, she brought a message: “Even in a world of cowardice, the courageous will not be silenced.” U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham sneered, “Hope Greta and her friends can swim,” a veiled threat that made headlines. Israeli lawyer Arsen Ostrovsky called her “a little Jihadi” and hinted it would be “sad if something were to happen to her flotilla.” These men in suits — paid to defend human rights — revealed their fear: that a teenage climate activist could expose a genocide.

Greta did not flinch. On June 1 she boarded a second aid ship, the Madleen, not as a celebrity stunt but as an act of conscience. Wrapped in a keffiyeh, flanked by doctors, artists, and lawmakers from Europe, Brazil, and the Middle East, she sailed into the blockade. “The world cannot be silent bystanders,” she declared. “This silence and passivity is deadly. We are seeing a systematic starvation of two million people. Every single one of us has a moral obligation to fight for a free Palestine.”

Critics spat bile. An Australian news host labeled her “the big loser of the week.” A guest quipped, “Let’s hope it’s a one-way voyage.” But Greta stood firm:
 “I’m not doing this because I’m brave. I’m doing this because I can’t stand by while others are starved, bombed, and erased. If that makes me dangerous, so be it.”
 Her words — direct, urgent — became a battering ram against indifference. Climate justice without Palestinian justice, she insisted, is incomplete. Her rebellion is contagious.

On May 2025, Senator Chuck Schumer’s book signing at the New York Public Library was transformed into a reckoning. Demonstrators rose one after another: “There’s no debate in genocide!” “Schumer, you have Palestinian blood on your hands!” “Zionism is not Judaism!” “Shame on you!” Security dragged them out, but their uncovering could not be silenced. As Schumer signed books, youth signed their defiance. Performative politics collapsed under real-time resistance.

Across 118 countries, over 18,000 people signed the Anti-Genocide Pledge in a single week — a campaign launched by Palestinian youth to write their own history:
 “The anti-genocide pledge is how we are writing our own history,” says Rua Daas of the Palestinian Youth Movement. “This moment is an ultimatum. You are either with genocide, or against it.”
 While states stall, youth document. While governments delay, masses decide. Students record testimonies, artists livestream uprisings, and ordinary people broadcast solidarity. Gazans write to their friends abroad, “Thank you for not forgetting us.” Their reply echoes across social media and protest stages:
 “We won’t.”

Because they have friends everywhere.

XII. The Time to Speak Is Now

Fear is the currency of silence. People tremble at being labeled antisemitic, fired, or accused of supporting Hamas. Others fear being shouted down, ostracized, or canceled. Yet every second of silence empowers the oppressor. Every hesitation chooses to ignore genocide.

Populist rhetoric from Western politicians only deepens the abyss of nihilism. As Senator Joni Ernst declared, “We’re all going to die. So for heaven’s sakes, folks…” her fatalistic shrug epitomizes a culture that abandons moral responsibility for cynicism.

Take Mahmoud Khalil — a Columbia graduate and Palestinian activist. For speaking truth about U.S.-funded war crimes, the Trump administration tried to deport him. A federal judge in New Jersey blocked it, ruling,

“Arguments that Khalil represents a threat to national security and foreign policy are not likely to hold up.”
 That was not just legal rebuke; it was a warning. Governments once fearful of protests now deport peace advocates. Silence remains complicit.

Even intimate knowledge of atrocities can’t break Wall-Street–style loyalty to career and boss. As Matthew Miller confessed on Sky News,

“He routinely defended Israel’s war crimes and never missed an opportunity to protect war criminal Netanyahu and his medieval gang members.”
 That is not naive ignorance — it is calculated damage control. And when Miller finally admitted,
 “I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes … but I didn’t say that at the podium, because I was expressing the conclusions of the United States government,”
 he laid bare how “democratic rhetoric” can — and does — shroud genocide.

During Vietnam, students marched. Today, they’re surveilled and expelled. We cannot wait for another “Napalm Girl” moment to awaken us. The time to act is now.

Attempts to discredit Franck Magennis, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappé, Gabor Maté, and Noam Chomsky have failed. Yet Irish rap trio Kneecap faces terrorism charges for waving a Palestinian flag. Ironically, Sinn Féin and the IRA — once called “terrorists” — now lead Ireland. Labels shift; power remains.

When children’s entertainer Ms. Rachel lamented, “When it’s controversial to advocate for children killed in the thousands … we have lost our way,” the New York Times responded with a hit piece. Compassion is not controversial. This is complicity.

The brutality of inverted moral logic fuels this culture of repression. As Matt Lieb observed,

“She antagonizes a Palestinian on the street, then claims she feels ‘unsafe’ — she’s the aggressor living in an inverted reality.”
 Cry wolf, shoot first, blame the children.

Lizzie Savetsky claims calls to stop killing children make her “unsafe” on campus, while every Palestinian university lies in rubble. The empire cheers her on, then deports Palestinian students for speaking out — while empowering Elon Musk, a ketamine-addicted billionaire who shares Nazi memes and oversaw deep public service cuts under Trump. Let that sink in: a government branding peaceful protesters terrorists also works with a ketamine-addled man shrugging off Nazi symbolism, trusting him with budget policy — while punishing student activists.

This isn’t about fighting hate; it’s about control. Antisemitism is a branding tool, a weapon to crush dissent, a moral panic masking genocide. What they fear isn’t hatred but accountability.

Israeli journalist Lee Caspi writes,

“We’re punished for helping people living through unimaginable conditions. As a mother to a 10-month-old, I carry shame over what my country is doing to children just an hour from Tel Aviv.”
 Meanwhile, a Middle East Eye investigation revealed Israel’s bombing campaign emits more carbon annually than 100 countries combined. This is not only genocide — it is ecocide.

Remember Hind Rajab. Six years old. Trapped in Gaza City in a car surrounded by tanks. Her cousins and uncle dead. She whispered into a phone, “Come get me. I’m scared.”

“The children were completely burnt,” her uncle recounted. “I carried my nephew Adam and my wounded cousin and rushed them to the hospital.”
 The ambulance trying to rescue her was shelled twice. Days later, her body was found charred, riddled with over 300 bullet holes. This was methodical murder. The world looked away.

Yet truth bleeds through. In May 2025, Channel 4 News reported over 100 Israeli reservists refusing Gaza service. One, Yamil, after 270 days, confessed,

“Unarmed people were shot because their lives didn’t matter. We refused to risk ourselves.”
 He called the campaign illegal, immoral, genocidal.

“When governments conflate dissent with terrorism and weaponize unverified tales of brutality, democracies surrender their capacity for critical scrutiny, and ordinary citizens become complicit in atrocities.”

TRT World and the Associated Press exposed Palestinians used as human shields. Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced for 17 days to walk ahead of soldiers with a camera strapped to his head — “Do this or we’ll kill you.” The Israeli army called this the “mosquito protocol.” Palestinians were “wasps.” These are not errors. They are policy.

Yet even as Gaza burns, Western nihilism grows. Arwa Damon reminds us,

“This is the annihilation of a population.”
 Her words demand action before it is too late.

But Hind’s whisper sparked rebellion. Macklemore’s “Hind’s Hall” became an anthem:

“You can bury us, but we are seeds.”
 That line blossomed across campuses and streets. When Kneecap returned after arrest, 20,000 roared: “Free Palestine.” Movements and songs cannot be jailed or silenced.

On May 29, 2025 — day 600 of Israel’s Gaza war — protesters stormed Likud headquarters demanding a cease-fire and hostages’ return:

“There’s a deal waiting. We just need a push. We pray we don’t reach day 700.”
 What was called defense now looks like political self-preservation.

If you feel no sorrow for Hind, your empathy has died. If you excuse bombing ambulances, you forfeit your claim to justice. Dr. Gabor Maté, trauma specialist, wrote,

“I cried daily for two weeks after visiting Gaza. The world stood by and let it happen. ‘Never again’ means never again for anyone — not a slogan but a burden.”

This is not about sides but lines — between truth and silence, complicity and resistance. Speaking is terrifying. Speak anyway. Each act of defiance chips away at tyranny.

Lee Camp sums it up:

“Calling out genocide gets you fired, funding genocide gets you reelected.”
 If the empire wasn’t lying, it would collapse.

Tony Gilroy, Andor showrunner, warns,

“Fascism destroys not just the oppressed, but those who built it.”

We rave about Andor Season 2. Season 3 is already here — in our streets, screens, and silences.

This is not fiction. This is rebellion. It has begun. The question is: Which side are you on?

XIII. A Final Call to Action

“When the ‘Napalm Girl’ photo shocked the world in 1972, it became a catalyst — a symbol of a war losing moral ground.”
 — Jehad Abusalim, Zeteo, May 27, 2025

“In Gaza, there are dozens of ‘Napalm Girl’ moments daily — live, unfiltered, haunting.”
 — Jehad Abusalim

We have borne witness. We have named the crime — genocide, apartheid, complicity — traced it from Herzl’s myth to Gaza’s burning children. We have exposed slogans as settler-colonial dogma, followed ethnic-cleansing blueprints, and shown that international law demands resistance. Yet the world hesitates.

This is Gaza’s Napalm Girl moment. Unlike in 1972, the image is relentless — livestreams, message threads, raw testimonies haunting every feed, classroom, and dinner table. The question is not whether we’ve seen enough, but whether we will act now.

What Must Be Done

1. Demand an immediate, permanent cease-fire.
    Call and write your representatives. Refuse to bankroll war crimes. End the blank checks arming apartheid.
2. Open humanitarian corridors.
    Support vetted aid organizations and pressure international bodies to guarantee safe passage for the wounded and displaced.
3. Amplify Palestinian voices.
    Share poems, footage, and first-person testimony. Elevate journalists and artists risking everything to document the truth. As Pulitzer winner Mosab Abu Toha writes,

• “They kill our children and destroy our homes — and we write poems about it.”

1. Expose complicity at home.
    Investigate how surveillance firms, weapons-manufacturers, and tech giants profit from occupation. Host teach-ins, forums, and town halls to make the invisible visible. Lee Camp warns,

• “You don’t live in a country with a mainstream media — you live in one with six corporations funded by war profiteers.”

1. Stand in solidarity with all justice struggles.
    Gaza is not isolated. Its echoes resonate in detention centers, checkpoints, and stolen lands worldwide. You cannot oppose colonialism abroad while ignoring violence and broken treaties at home.

If one photo ended a war, Gaza’s endless livestreams must shatter this one’s foundations. We have named the horror, unraveled the myth, and heard the children. Now, speak — clearly, loudly, relentlessly — until Gaza’s children, like Kim Phuc before them, can say:

“The world heard us. And it changed.”

“Silence is not neutral. It is participation.”
 — Miko Peled

Make no mistake: this is Gaza’s moment of reckoning — and ours.

XIV. Listen to the Children

As this essay reaches its final chords, it is the youngest witnesses who compel us to reckon with truth. In their voices, we hear displacement, siege, and the wrenching toll of family lost. Their words must not only be heard — they demand our conscience.

1. Defiance in Jenin Camp

In a Jenin refugee camp, Israeli forces urged a young girl to abandon her home. They offered money and safety; her reply was resolute.

بقوللك اطلعي من المخيم اسكني بمكان ثاني
 “I tell you: leave the camp, live somewhere else.”

بتروحي لا
 “Are you going to go? No.”

طبعا لو شو ما ينطوني إن شاء الله ينطوني مليون إن شاء الله ينطوني 2 مليونين مش طالع
 “Even if they give me a million — God willing, two million — I will not leave.”

ولو الجيش بلش يقصف بخاف منها، بس المهم أنو الكلاب، ولو فلتت الطيارات والسلاح بصير بوسوا
 “Even if the army bombs us, I am terrified — but they are dogs. If planes and weapons come, we will be crushed.”

جرّنا بده يطلعونا من أرضنا، مش رح نطلع، ها أرضنا وأرض جدودنا، صامدين صامدين
 “They want to force us from our land; we will not go. This is our land, our grandparents’ land. We stand firm — firm.”

صامدين يعني ما تخافي من أي صوت رصاص أو قصف أو انفجار — ما بترعبك ولا رصاص ولا قصف ولا انفجار
 “Standing firm means you are not afraid of any gunshot, any shell, any explosion.”

أنا بخاف شوي، بس بخاف إلا من الله — الله حامينا
 “I am a little scared, yes, but I fear only God — God protects us.”

بدي استشهد على أرضي، بدي أموت على أرضي. إذا هربت من أرضي، ما بدي أموت هناك. منيح نموت هون أرحّ شهداء عند رب العالمين
 “I want to be martyred on my land. I want to die on my land. If I run away, I don’t want to die elsewhere. Better to die here and become martyrs before the Lord of the Worlds.”

Her “No” embodies centuries of displacement distilled into unwavering refusal. Her home in Jenin is more than stone and dust — it is her identity, her ancestors’ promise. To accept exile, even for vast sums, would be to sever that bond. By declaring “we stand firm,” she alchemizes fear into resolve: bombs may fall, but exile is a fate worse than death. In her vow — “I want to be martyred on my land” — she reclaims agency over life and death. In her defiance, rootedness becomes resistance.

2. Testimony from a Hospital Bed: Omar’s Plea

Lying on a hospital bed, his body burned and his family gone, Omar ushers his anguish into the world. His scars speak both violence and endurance.

أنس، وصل لي رسالة للعالم
 “Anas, send me a message to the world.”

كنت أتفرج عليك، أنت كنت تقول “أنس الجزيرة، شو غزة” وتوصل رسائل للعالم
 “I was watching you when you said ‘Anas Al-Jazeera, what about Gaza?’ You were sending messages to the world.”

وصل لي رسالة واحدة: إنه أنا بدي أسافر وأتعلّج. أنا مريض، حالي صعبة، بدي أسافر برازي.
 “Send me just one message: I want to travel and be treated. I’m sick — my condition is serious. I want to go abroad.”

سوّت طواعق نزلت عليّ، اتعرضت لحروب. أهلي توفّوا واستشهدوا كلهم، وأنا وأبوي الناجيين الوحيدين. عندي حروق. كل ما يغيروا الضمادات، بفظع؛ كأنه تابوت.
 “Shells rained on me; I was caught in the bombardment. My family — all martyred — perished. Only my father and I survived. I have burns. Every time they change my bandages, it is terrible — like a coffin.”

أنا تحت الأنقاض، أنفَق، يخنق فيّ، وأتعذّب. ما حطّوا لي فنج أو ماء أو شيء…
 “I’m under the rubble, suffocating; I’m being tortured. They don’t give me even a cup of water…”

طيب، إيش رسالتك لأطفال العالم؟
 “Okay, what is your message for the children of the world?”

أطفال العالم، أنا وأنهار الدموع… هذا هو حال عمر، الناجي الوحيد بعد المجزرة اللي ارتكبتها قوات الاحتلال بحق عيلة الحصري حول مستشفى الشفاء. رسالة عمر لازم توصل لكل العالم. هناك آلاف الأطفال بحالي.
 “Children of the world, I and my rivers of tears… This is Omar’s state, the only survivor after the occupation committed a massacre against the Al-Husari family near Al-Shifa Hospital. Omar’s message must reach the entire world. There are thousands of children like me.”

Omar’s plea — “I want to travel and be treated” — is no mere request; it is an indictment of siege as assault on life. His burns transform every bandage change into fresh agony — “like a coffin” — revealing medicine twisted into torture. By addressing “children of the world,” he claims moral agency: his survival is testimony, his scars loud proof that borders have become prisons. In insisting “Omar’s message must reach the entire world,” he demands that we bear witness. His body under rubble renounces anonymity, insisting that when institutions trap hope, hope itself becomes rebellion.

3. Remembering a Mother: Mahmoud’s Appeal

Among ruins of what once was home, nine-year-old Mahmoud grieves his mother’s death. Even as agony rips his body, he insists on memory.

أمي قُتلت قدامي وأنا كنت صغير. الانفجار ودّمر البيت، دمعت عيوني، دمعت قلبي.
 “My mother was killed before my eyes when I was small. The explosion destroyed our home; my eyes cried, my heart cried.”

قالوا إن الأمان كان يبعد عن هنا، بس هنا هو بيتي.
 “They said safety was far from here, but this is my home.”

لو بحاول أهرب، بأي مكان رح أروح؟ ما في مكان… الأرض كلها تدمرت، كل الناس رحلوا.
 “If I try to run, where would I go? There is nowhere… the land is all destroyed; everyone has left.”

أمي ماتت وأنا مع أبِي الوحيدان. حالي صعبة — مكسور عظامي وجسمي كله يحرق، وبدموع ما توقف.
 “My mother died, and only my father and I survived. I’m in terrible shape — my bones are broken, my whole body burns, and my tears never stop.”

بس بدي أخبر العالم: أمي كانت تعلمني أقرأ، تحرسني، وتضحك. هي أمي. رح ينسوها بس إنتو لا تنسوها.
 “But I want to tell the world: my mother taught me to read, protected me, and made me laugh. She is my mother. They will forget her, but you — do not forget her.”

أنا بموت على أمل إن صوتي يوصل، وما حد ينسى اسمي. اسمي محمود، عندي تسع سنين.
 “I will die hoping my voice reaches, and no one forgets my name. My name is Mahmoud; I am nine years old.”

Mahmoud’s words pierce the heart. His home lies in ruins; his mother murdered before his eyes. When he asks, “Where would I go?” he unmasks the lie of safe havens — every path leads to ash. His broken, burning body bears witness to survival as torment. Yet even amid agony, he demands remembrance: “They will forget her, but you — do not forget her.” By naming himself — “My name is Mahmoud; I am nine years old” — he rejects erasure. His plea becomes a last stand for memory: if his voice reaches, his mother’s laughter will endure beyond violence.

Conclusion: A Call to Conscience

These children speak through fear and loss, forging defiance into song. Their stories share a single thread: home is worth more than any promise of safety, survival itself is testimony, and memory stands as resistance.

To ignore them is to accept that children — no less than adults — can be uprooted, starved, and silenced. When they say “we stand firm,” “my message must reach the entire world,” and “don’t forget my mother,” they compel us to choose: silence or action.

Let their words echo beyond this page. If “never again” means anything, it begins here — with a resolve to bear witness, to amplify their voices, and to act on their truth.

XV. Appendix: Controversial Claims, Backed by Evidence

This essay makes several claims that may challenge assumptions or unsettle comfort. Each rests on verifiable facts, legal precedent, and testimony from respected scholars and human rights experts. Below are the most contested claims — and why we stand by them — followed by supplemental entries illustrating how historical literacy, eyewitness testimony, and foundational scholarship strengthen our arguments.

A. Core Claims

1. “Israel is committing genocide.”
 The United Nations Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction — including starvation, mass displacement, and bombing of bakeries, hospitals, and schools — meets this threshold. As of mid-2024, over 14,000 Palestinian children had been killed in Gaza. Water systems were targeted, hospitals leveled, and famine persists. In June 2025, Israel approved the largest-ever West Bank settlement expansion and passed laws sentencing Palestinian minors as young as twelve to life imprisonment. This is not occupation; it is a calculated campaign of racial elimination. UN Special Rapporteurs, former ICC prosecutors, and legal scholars — including drafters of the Rome Statute — affirm that Israel’s actions meet genocide criteria. The International Court of Justice is adjudicating South Africa’s case against Israel under the Genocide Convention. In 2025, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

“Israel is not defending itself. Israel is committing genocide. I know because I was raised to believe the opposite — and I served in that army.”
 — Miko Peled, The General’s Son

2. “Zionism is not Judaism.”
 Zionism is a political ideology rooted in 19th-century European nationalism; Judaism is a 3,000-year-old faith and culture. They are not synonymous. Many Jews — religious and secular — have long opposed Zionism on ethical or theological grounds. Conflating Zionism with Judaism erases dissent, flattens Jewish identity, and weaponizes faith to shield state violence.

“To equate Zionism with Judaism is to slander Judaism. Zionism is a political ideology built on racism and dispossession. It is the very antithesis of the Jewish values I was raised with.”
 — Miko Peled

3. “Israel has weaponized Holocaust memory to deflect criticism.”
 This is not Holocaust denial but a critique of trauma’s political misuse. Scholars like Norman Finkelstein and Ilan Pappé document how Holocaust memory silences dissent and shields Israel from accountability.

“Using the Holocaust to justify Israel’s crimes is like using 9/11 to justify torture. It dishonors victims and empowers perpetrators.”
 — Miko Peled

4. “Palestinians have a legal right to resist occupation.”
 International law — including the Geneva Conventions and multiple UN resolutions — recognizes the right of occupied peoples to resist, including by force, provided civilians are not deliberately targeted. While many Western governments label Hamas “terrorist,” states such as China, Russia, Turkey, Iran, and South Africa do not. The Rome Statute affirms that resistance against military occupation is distinct from terrorism. Palestinians, under decades of foreign domination, retain the legal right to resist erasure.

5. “The United States and United Kingdom are complicit in war crimes.”
 Complicity under international law requires material support and knowledge, not shared intent. The U.S. provides over $3 billion annually in military aid to Israel, vetoes most UN cease-fire and investigation resolutions, and supplies weapons and intelligence used against civilians. The U.K. exports fighter-jet components and shares surveillance data — fully aware of their use. In early 2025, a UN Special Rapporteur called Israel’s starvation blockade “genocide by attrition.” By enabling it, the U.S. and U.K. are not bystanders — they are accessories.

“U.S. elites funnel unparalleled resources to Israel — ‘despite constituting about 0.01 percent of the world population, they’ve received 30 percent of all U.S. foreign aid since World War II… about $4 billion every year.’”
 — Independent analysis, June 2025

6. “Zionist vigilante groups in Canada operate with state protection and charitable status.”
 Investigative journalist Samira Moyed (June 2025) exposed Magen Herut — a Canadian-based Zionist vigilante organization that has surveilled pro-Palestinian demonstrators and impersonated police officers at the University of Toronto. Despite these actions, Magen Herut holds charitable status, receiving tax-deductible donations. A subsequent campaign pressured the Canada Revenue Agency to revoke that status. The same exposé highlighted the Abraham Global Peace Initiative — a Zionist lobby group that hosted Israeli Ambassador Gilad Erdan at a luxury Toronto fundraiser. Erdan has publicly declared that the United Nations should be “wiped off the face of the earth” while defending Israel’s bombing of UN facilities and the deaths of over 300 UN staff. That group’s 2025 white paper called for federal oversight of Canadian universities and curricula, and a “values test” for immigrants requiring affirmation of “Israel’s right to exist.”

“Zionism is not content to occupy land. It seeks to occupy language, policy, and law — even in countries where it has no border.”
 — Samira Moyed

B. Supplemental Sidebar: Historical, Eyewitness & Legal Foundations

Below are nine entries — controversial quotes and claims — to illustrate how historical literacy, firsthand testimony, and foundational scholarship bolster the core arguments above.

1. Rabbi Weiss (Orthodox Jewish Theological Rejection of Zionism)

“It is antithetical to Judaism to have our own state. … Zionism is the vilest movement… empowered by ‘the most expensive PR and the power of AIPAC.’”
 — Rabbi Moshe Weiss, lecture at Jerusalem Yeshiva, April 12, 2025. Transcript obtained from rabbiweiss.org.

An Orthodox Jewish voice, Rabbi Weiss affirms that Zionism contradicts core Jewish teachings — demonstrating that not all Jews endorse a political state founded on ethnic supremacy.

2. “The Palestinians Made the Desert Bloom” (Agricultural Evidence)

“The Palestinians made the desert bloom long before the first Zionists arrived.”
 — Saleh Abu Khalil, spokesperson for a local farming cooperative in Ramallah, June 2025.

Historical surveys and Ottoman records confirm centuries of Palestinian agriculture. This testimony rebuts the myth of “unoccupied land,” reinforcing the settler-colonial critique.

3. “Narrative Warfare & Fabricated Atrocities” (Propaganda and False Atrocity Claims)

“Independent investigations — both by Israeli media and international correspondents — revealed that some of the most horrific atrocity claims used to justify bombing civilian neighborhoods in Gaza were fabrications… This pattern of manufacturing outrage to sanction military aggression is not new…”
 — BreakThrough News investigative report, May 2025.

False atrocity stories — such as “babies hanged on laundry lines” — were circulated to desensitize global audiences and justify massive civilian casualties. This documentary analysis exposes how propaganda fuels genocide.

4. Zachary Foster (Historical Study Leading to Moral Clarity)

“The more you study Palestinian history and Israeli history, the more pro-Palestinian you become.”
 — Zachary Foster, quoted by Raisa Orthy on social media, June 2, 2025.

Scholars find that deeper engagement with historical sources — from Ottoman land registries to British Mandate surveys — inevitably raises questions about justice and ownership in historic Palestine.

5. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation & Biometric ID “Death Traps” (Eyewitness Testimony)

“We cannot approach the U.S. aid distribution post. Israeli drones open fire and drop bombs on us.”
 — Eyewitness testimony, Al Jazeera English, June 2, 2025.

Forced through biometric checkpoints while drones hover overhead, starving civilians enter “aid corridors” — only to be shot. This direct account shows how humanitarianism is weaponized to maintain siege.

6. Raphael Lemkin (Foundational Legal-Historical Reference)

“I became interested in genocide because it has happened so many times — and the criminals guilty of it were not punished.”
 — Raphael Lemkin, as quoted in Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry (Verso Books, 2000).

The architect of the Genocide Convention underscores that impunity enables genocide. His insight explains why naming atrocities matters — and why silence invites repetition.

7. Franck Magennis (Definition of Apartheid)

“Separate laws, movement restrictions, dual systems of justice — these are not opinions; these are facts. These are the elements of apartheid under international law.”
 — Franck Magennis, quoted in The Jewish Chronicle, May 1, 2025.

A British human rights barrister, Magennis anchored his 2025 lawsuit in the Rome Statute and the Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. His ruling confirmed that Israel’s dual legal systems in the West Bank satisfy the legal definition of apartheid.

8. Noam Chomsky (On Industrialized Silencing)

“The Holocaust industry exists not to honor victims but to deflect criticism of the powerful.”
 — Noam Chomsky, as cited in Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry (Verso Books, 2000).

Chomsky’s critique reveals how memory of past suffering can be repurposed to shield state violence. This insight frames the moral-historical argument that weaponized memory hides ongoing atrocities.

9. Ta-Nehisi Coates (On Jim Crow in the West Bank)

“No country establishes its existence through rights. They establish it through force — as America did. Israel’s existence is fact, not a moral entitlement.”
 — Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Message (One World, 2024).

Coates dismantles exceptionalism by comparing American and Israeli state formation. His observation reframes occupation as the logic of force rather than a rightful national project.

By anchoring each claim in history, law, and firsthand testimony, this appendix demonstrates that discomfort does not equal falsehood. The evidence stands: genocide, apartheid, and complicity are not abstractions but lived realities.

Final Note: Why We Speak

This essay is not a call for violence, nor does it erase trauma. It calls to end genocide and apartheid — and affirms that no people — Jewish, Muslim, Christian, or otherwise — should live under racial supremacy.
 Zionism is a political project born of trauma and sustained by domination. Ending it does not erase Jewish life in the region; it ends a regime that justifies starvation, displacement, and bombing children in the name of safety.
 There is no moral defense for ethnic cleansing, no excuse for flattening hospitals, no justification for silencing a child’s cry for help.

The world watches.
 The children watch.
 If conscience remains, we must speak — clearly, loudly, without apology — until freedom comes.

Speaking truth is not only an act of protest — it is an act of transformation. For those born into power, that truth can be excruciating. But it can also be redemptive.

“I describe myself as an Israeli who was liberated by Palestinians… I liberated myself from a very racist ideology thanks to Palestinians who allowed me, very graciously, to go through that excruciating process.”
 — Miko Peled, June 1, 2025

Peled’s words remind us: liberation is not a gift given to the oppressed. It is a light they carry — and sometimes extend to those who once denied it. To speak now is to walk that path with them. Not out of pity. Out of respect. Out of necessity.

We do not speak because it is safe.
 We speak because silence kills.
 We speak because there is no other honest way to live.

This is all it means to be human

“We read each name
 of the 15,613 children
 who had been killed in Gaza.
 We began at 10 AM.
 We had not even got to
 the 5-year-olds by 3 PM.

What does it mean
 to be part of a world
 that allows this?
 Each child was a beacon.
 A glowing light that was loved.
 So many of us cried
 through the names we were given to read.
 It took till 2:30 AM to read
 every name out loud.
 What does it mean
 to be a human in a world
 that allows this to happen.
 A Holocaust survivor
 his eyes full of tears and kindness
 carried the names he read like a prayer.
 His voice tender as a cradle to guide
 thousands of lights to the stars.
 This is all it means to be human.
 To know the beating heart
 of the world even when it is a wound.”
 — Anonymous Palestinian Poet

Let their words echo beyond this page. If “never again” means anything, it begins here — with a resolve to bear witness, amplify these voices, and act on their truth.

Further Reading & Voices of Conscience

Legal & Human Rights
 • Franck Magennis
 • UN Special Rapporteurs & ICC filings
 • Human Rights Watch / Amnesty International

Jewish Voices of Dissent
 • Norman Finkelstein
 • Gabor Maté
 • Noam Chomsky
 • Miko Peled — Israeli author, former IDF soldier (The General’s Son)

Historical & Political Analysis
 • Ilan Pappé
 • Ta-Nehisi Coates
 • Rashid Khalidi
 • Edward Said

Global Contrast & Alternative Models
 • China’s Foreign Ministry White Papers
 • The Beijing Declaration (2024)
 • South Africa’s ICC Filings

Bibliography

Camp, Lee. “There’s No Military Doctrine Left — Just Collapse.” Redacted News, May 30, 2025. https://redactednews.com/2025/05/30/no-military-doctrine.

Al Jazeera English. “Gaza Hunger Crisis: US-backed Aid Becomes ‘Death Trap’ Under Israeli Fire.” YouTube video, 2:08. Posted June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INSERT-LINK.

Amer, Mo. Mo Amer: Mohammed in Texas. Directed by Stan Lathan. Netflix, 2022.

Amnesty International. Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity. London: Amnesty International, 2022. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/5141/2022/en/.

Anonymous Palestinian Poet. “This Is All It Means to Be Human.” Reposted by Nikita Gill and Misan Harriman. Instagram, May 2025.

Ball, Krystal. Comment during Breaking Points podcast, on U.S. official’s resignation from the Gaza aid program. Video podcast, November 2023. (Krystal Ball: “The guy the U.S. picked to run the program — he resigned. Said it was too much. That tells you everything.”)

Bernstein, Matt. Instagram post (@mattxiv), October 2023. (Graphic advocating for Palestinian children, noting disproportionate casualties.) https://www.instagram.com/p/CyL… (accessed Nov. 2023).

Blumenthal, Max, and Wyatt Reed. “Israeli Mossad Named as Funder of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.” The Grayzone, May 29, 2025. https://thegrayzone.com/2025/05/29/israeli-mossad-gaza-humanitarian-foundation-aid/.

Blumenthal, Max. “The Truth Behind the D.C. Shooting and Its Political Fallout.” The Grayzone, May 30, 2025. https://thegrayzone.com.

BreakThrough News. “‘Andor’ Star: I Refuse to Stay Silent on Gaza.” YouTube video, 15:59. June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8zz5AK1zog.

BreakThrough News. “After sustained pressure from pro-Palestine students and protesters, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has cut ties with Elbit Systems — Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer.” Facebook post, April 26, 2025. https://www.facebook.com/BreakThroughNews/posts/[post-ID] (accessed June 3, 2025).

BreakThrough News. “Israel is Paying Influencers to Spread Its Propaganda.” YouTube video, 5:22. Posted June 3, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INSERT-LINK.

BreakThrough News. “Leaked Documents Reveal Trump Admin Plan To Destroy Palestine Movement.” Facebook video, May 22, 2025. https://www.facebook.com/BreakThroughNews/videos/[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

Chomsky, Noam. Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians. Updated ed. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999.

Cohen, Dan. Comment in interview on The Jimmy Dore Show, November 2023. (Dan Cohen: “Zionism is a pseudo-Messianic, colonial nationalist movement that rebranded Jewish identity into a racialized nation-state project. It is not Judaism — it is an instrument of imperial power.”) YouTube video.

Confronting Israelis About Palestine #3. YouTube video, approx. 17 min. June 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-ASsaN_ac8&ab_channel=HamzahDaily.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. UN General Assembly Resolution 260 A (III), December 9, 1948. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf.

Daas, Rua. “Anti-Genocide Pledge: Palestinian Activists Make Record of Global Solidarity With Gaza.” BreakThrough News, May 31, 2025. Video, 14:23. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIDEO_ID_HERE.

Damon, Arwa. Comment in Useful Idiots podcast episode, hosted by Katie Halper and Aaron Maté. “We’re All Going to Die | Fundraiser Special.” YouTube video, 1:33:00. Streamed June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxxxx.

Democracy Now!. “The U.N. Children’s Fund reports the number of Gaza’s children killed or injured by Israel since October 2023 has passed 50,000.” Facebook post, June 3, 2025. https://www.facebook.com/DemocracyNow/posts/[post-ID] (accessed June 3, 2025).

Donlevy, Katherine. “Greta Thunberg to Sail to Gaza on Humanitarian Ship as Critics Beg Her to Stay with Hamas: ‘Let’s Hope It’s a One-Way Voyage.’” New York Post, May 31, 2025. https://nypost.com/2025/05/31/news/greta-thunberg-to-sail-to-gaza-on-humanitarian-ship-as-critics-beg-her-to-stay/.

DWS News. “Greta Thunberg Sails to Gaza — after Surviving a Drone Attack!” YouTube video, 3:23. May 31, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtgAsw6ADiQ&ab_channel=DWSNews.

Ernst, Joanie. “Town Hall Remarks on Medicaid and Mortality.” Quoted in Useful Idiots podcast episode, hosted by Katie Halper and Aaron Maté. “We’re All Going to Die | Fundraiser Special.” YouTube video, 1:33:00. Streamed June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxxxx.

Finkelstein, Norman G. The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. New York: Verso Books, 2000. (See Finkelstein’s critique: “The Holocaust has become an industry — not to honor the dead, but to deflect criticism of the powerful.”)

Foster, Zachary. Quote widely attributed on social media: “The more you study Palestinian history and Israeli history, the more pro-Palestinian you become.” Shared by Norman Finkelstein via Raisa Orthy, Facebook, June 2, 2025.

France 24 English. “French Mathematician Michel Broué on Giving Free Online Lectures to Gaza Students.” France 24, June 2, 2025. https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/perspective/20250602-french-mathematician-michel-brou%C3%A9-on-giving-free-online-lectures-to-gaza-students.

Ghaffar-Siddiqui, Sabreena. Public statement on the comparison of Nazism and Zionism in education. Posted to X (formerly Twitter), May 2025. https://twitter.com.

Graham, Lindsey. Twitter post. June 1, 2025. Twitter/X. https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/… (full URL if known).

Grant, Ellie. “Barrister Representing Hamas Says Legal Bid Aims to ‘End Israel.’” The Jewish Chronicle, May 1, 2025. (Quotes Franck Magennis calling Israel an apartheid state and Gaza a “concentration camp.”) https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/barrister-representing-hamas-end-israel-cfl0sjla.

Grim, Ryan. Comment during Breaking Points news show (CounterPoints episode), November 2023. (Ryan Grim: “Four people were crushed by bags of flour and killed … this was initially blamed on Hamas, but eyewitnesses and footage show it was panic, desperation, and bullets.”)

Hayes, Chris. “Bombshell New Report on Musk’s ‘Intense’ Use of Ketamine, Other Drugs.” MSNBC, May 31, 2025. Video, 7:02. https://www.msnbc.com/.

History.Culture.projects. “The Zionists Did Not ‘Make the Desert Bloom.’” YouTube video, May 25, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

Human Rights Watch. “‘A Threshold Crossed’: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution.” Human Rights Watch report, April 27, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution.

Jewish Voice for Peace. “Zionism Is Not Judaism — It Is the Betrayal of It.” Not In Our Name campaign statement, 2023. (JVP statement widely quoted: “Zionism is not Judaism — it is the betrayal of it.”) https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/zionism-is-not-judaism.

Jones, Owen. “Israeli Intelligence Admits Vilest Lie.” YouTube video, January 26, 2024. https://www.yJones, Owen. “Israeli Intelligence Admits Vilest Lie.” YouTube video, January 26, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awffsJC5y90&ab_channel=OwenJones.

Khalidi, Rashid. The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2020.

Kulinski, Kyle. “BREAKING: ISRAEL REJECTS HAMAS OFFER TO STEP DOWN & LEAVE GAZA!” The Kyle Kulinski Show. YouTube video, 19:46. June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[insert full YouTube ID here once available].

Lascaris, Dimitri. Post on X (Twitter), Nov. 15, 2023. (“They are using starvation to herd people into what are essentially concentration camps in the desert. American mercenaries are laughing while guarding starving civilians. This is Nazi shit.”) https://twitter.com/dimitrilascaris/status/159272… (archived).

Macklemore. “Hind’s Hall.” Single. Bendo LLC, released May 6, 2024. (Protest song honoring 6-year-old Hind Rajab and supporting Palestinian students; proceeds to UNRWA.) Available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/xyz… and streaming platforms.

McNamara, Kat. “Australian MP Breaks Down in Tears as She Speaks of the Genocide in Gaza.” Middle East Eye, YouTube video, March 26, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB5RUV8by00&ab_channel=MiddleEastEye.

Malcolm X. Speech on the Palestine question, Cairo, July 1964. (Malcolm X: “The Palestinian struggle is not just a cry for justice — it’s a blistering battle for the most fundamental human rights that every living soul on this planet should inherit by birthright … an unyielding resistance against the oppressive, suffocating grip of occupation.”) Quoted in Workers World, Feb. 2024.

Mandela, Nelson. “Address by President Nelson Mandela at International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.” Pretoria, December 4, 1997. (Mandela: “We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”) https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/speech-president-nelson-mandela-palestine-1997.

Maté, Aaron. Comment during Useful Idiots podcast episode, hosted by Katie Halper and Aaron Maté. “We’re All Going to Die | Fundraiser Special.” YouTube video, 1:33:00. Streamed June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxxxx.

Maté, Gabor. Foreword to A Land With A People: Palestinians and Jews Confront Zionism, edited by Esther Farmer et al. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2021. (Dr. Maté, a Holocaust survivor, recounts visiting Gaza — “I cried every day for two weeks after visiting Gaza … ‘Never again’ means never again for anyone, not just for one people.”)

McCain, Cindy. Comment during World Food Programme press remarks. Quoted in Useful Idiots podcast episode, hosted by Katie Halper and Aaron Maté. “We’re All Going to Die | Fundraiser Special.” YouTube video, 1:33:00. Streamed June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxxxx.

Middle East Eye. “Gaza’s Government Media Office Has Accused Israel of Committing a ‘Horrific and Deliberate Crime.’” Facebook post, June 3, 2025. https://www.facebook.com/MiddleEastEye/posts/[post-ID] (accessed June 3, 2025).

Middle East Eye. “Israeli Settler Violence at Highest Level in 20 Years, UN Reports.” Middle East Eye, June 2, 2025. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/un-israeli-settler-violence-record-report.

Middle East Eye. “Nine-Year-Old Mahmoud Speaks from Gaza Camp After Losing Mother.” YouTube video, April 10, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

Middle East Eye. “‘If I Die, I Will Die in My Homeland’: Palestinian Girl.” YouTube video, April 6, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

Middle East Eye. “Public Support for Israel in European Countries Has Fallen to Its Lowest Recorded Level, According to a Recent Survey by YouGov.” Facebook post, June 3, 2025. https://www.facebook.com/MiddleEastEye/posts/[post-ID] (accessed June 3, 2025).

Middle East Eye. “UN: 33,000 Palestinians Remain Displaced in the West Bank Due to Settler and Military Violence.” Middle East Eye, June 2, 2025.

Mond, Samira. “TORONTO ZIONIST GROUP HOSTS ISRAELI AMBASSADOR TO UNITED NATIONS.” On The Line Media, June 1, 2025. Video, 16:50. https://www.patreon.com/posts/toronto-zionist-104325962.

Moyed, Samira. “‘TORONTO ZIONIST GROUP HOSTS ISRAELI AMBASSADOR TO UNITED NATIONS.’” On The Line Media, June 1, 2025. Video, 16:50. https://www.patreon.com/posts/toronto-zionist-104325962.

MSNBC. “Ben Rhodes: Situation in Gaza ‘Unimaginably Worse Than We Can Even Tell from the Outside.’” YouTube video, 6:11. June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmDhMsT4kE4.

Olmert, Ehud. “Will Not One Israeli Say: End the War for Gaza’s Sake?” Haaretz (Tel Aviv), May 25, 2025. (Former PM Olmert: “What we are doing in Gaza now is a war of extermination — indiscriminate, unrestrained, brutal and criminal killing of civilians … Yes, Israel is committing war crimes.”) https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2025-05-25/… (in Hebrew; English summary in The Guardian, May 27, 2025).

Ophuls, Marcel. The Sorrow and the Pity. Documentary film. Directed by Marcel Ophuls. France/Switzerland: Nouvelles Éditions de Films, 1969.

Pappé, Ilan. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2006. (Historical analysis by Pappé: “the Nakba was not a single catastrophe, but an ongoing process” of dispossession.)

Peled, Miko. Interview by Hammy. “Let’s Just Talk.” June 1, 2025. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_N8SNfZyV8&ab_channel=Let%27sJustTalk.

Peled, Miko. The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine. 2nd ed. Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books, 2016. (Peled: “Open up the definition of the crime of genocide … compare it to what’s been done to Palestinians since 1948 — it checks almost every box.”)

Piers Morgan Uncensored. “Is Israel Committing Genocide? Norman Finkelstein & Benny Morris Debate Gaza War | Piers Morgan Uncensored.” YouTube video, 10:06. Posted May 28, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4jN7IEYNOs&ab_channel=PiersMorganUncensored.

Pritsker, Kei. “Israel Is Paying Influencers to Spread Its Propaganda.” BreakThrough News, June 3, 2025. Video, 9:24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ3vFyTpIuY.

Rashid, Qasim. “When Strong Women Intimidate Weak Men.” Let’s Address This, June 2, 2025. https://www.qasimrashid.com/p/when-strong-women-intimidate-weak.

Said, Edward W. The Question of Palestine. New York: Times Books, 1979. (Said on Palestinian dispossession and the Zionist project.)

Savetsky, Lizzy. Viral TikTok video confronting an Arab taxi driver in NYC, April 2025. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@lizzysavetsky.

Sky News. “Gaza Hospital Attack: Analysis Contradicts Israel’s Evidence Justifying Airstrike.” Sky News, May 14, 2025. https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-hospital-attack-analysis-contradicts-israels-evidence-justifying-airstrike-13367823.

South Africa (Department of International Relations and Cooperation). Application Instituting Proceedings against Israel under the Genocide Convention. Filed at the International Court of Justice, December 29, 2023. ICJ General List №186 (2023). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/186.

South Africa et al. “Referral of the Situation in Palestine to the International Criminal Court.” Article 14 ICC Referral, November 17, 2023. ICC Registry №2023/066 (2023). https://www.icc-cpi.int/articles/referral-situation-palestine.

Thakker, Prem. “Lindsey Graham’s Disgusting Tweet About Greta Thunberg Is ‘Brain Rot’ in Its Truest, Most Vulgar Sense.” Zeteo, June 2, 2025. https://zeteo.com/p/lindsey-grahams-disgusting-tweet.

Tutu, Desmond. “Apartheid in the Holy Land.” The Guardian, April 29, 2002. (Tutu: “I’ve seen the checkpoints and roadblocks — it reminded me so much of what we experienced under apartheid … Israel will never get true security through oppressing another people. A true peace can only be built on justice.”) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/29/comment.

TRT World. “Actor Seth Rogen Says He Was ‘Fed Lies’ About Creation of State of Israel.” YouTube video, July 31, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

TRT World. “Existence of Zionist Israel Is Antithetical to Judaism: Rabbi Weiss.” YouTube video, November 23, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[video-ID] (accessed June 4, 2025).

TRT World. “Israeli Troops Are Systematically Forcing Palestinians to Act as Human Shields in Gaza and the Occupied West Bank … ‘Mosquito Protocol.’” Instagram post (@trtworld), May 25, 2025. (Summarizing AP/TRT reports: Palestinians, like Ayman Abu Hamadan, were forced at gunpoint to clear houses for Israeli units — soldiers dubbed the practice “mosquito protocol.”)

UK Artists for Palestine. “Letter from Cultural Figures Against Arms Sales to Israel.” Artists for Palestine UK, May 2025. https://artistsforpalestine.org.uk.

“Why Tot Celebrity Ms. Rachel Waded Into the Gaza Debate.” New York Times, May 22, 2025. (Reporter Marc Tracy details how children’s entertainer Rachel Griffin-Accurso (“Ms. Rachel”) posted on social media, “When it’s controversial to advocate for children killed in the thousands … we have lost our way,” prompting backlash and queries if she was “paid by Hamas.”) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/22/style/ms-rachel-israel-gaza.html.

United Nations General Assembly. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention). 75 U.N.T.S. 287, entered into force October 21, 1950 (adopted August 12, 1949). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/3858ee?OpenDocument.

United Nations. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. 2187 U.N.T.S. 90, adopted July 17, 1998, entered into force July 1, 2002. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf.

Willey, Damien. “The Houthis Just MASSIVELY Expanded Their Air Blockade on Israel!” YouTube video, 12:02. Kernow Damo, June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/KernowDamo.

Winnipeg Free Press. “Owners of Café Accused of Faking Antisemitic Attack.” Winnipeg Free Press, August 15, 2019. https://www.winnipegfreepress.com.

YouTube — Channel 4 News. “The Israeli Reservists Refusing to Fight in Gaza.” Channel 4 News segment, May 27, 2025. (Report on over 100 IDF reservists who refuse to serve in Gaza; includes testimony of Yamil, a soldier confessing to shooting unarmed people “because their lives didn’t matter…”). https://www.channel4.com/news/the-israeli-reservists-refusing-to-fight-in-gaza.

YouGov. “Public Support for Israel at Lowest Since Polling Began.” YouGov.uk, May 2025. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2025/05/20/israel-favorability-low-record.

Haaretz. “IDF Re-drafts Reservists with PTSD, At Least Two Killed in Gaza.” Haaretz, February 12, 2025. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-02-12/ty-article/idf-re-drafts-reservists-with-ptsd.

The Jerusalem Post. “IDF Suspends Female Combat Fitness Track amid Exemptions Surge.” The Jerusalem Post, January 18, 2025. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-739281.

Times of Israel. “Haredi Parties Give Netanyahu Ultimatum on Conscription, Government on Brink.” The Times of Israel, March 25, 2025. https://www.timesofisrael.com/haredi-forces-netanyahu-to-choose-conscription-or-coalition.

Toronto Star. “Canada Opens War-Crimes Probe into Former IDF Soldiers in Canada.” Toronto Star, April 3, 2025. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2025/04/03/canada-opens-war-crimes-probe-into-idf-veterans.html.

Haaretz. “Ehud Olmert: Gaza Operation ‘Unacceptable, Unbearable, Unforgivable.’” Haaretz, May 25, 2025. https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2025-05-25/ty-article/ehud-olmert-gaza-operation-unforgivable.

Friedman, Thomas L. “As Israel’s War Rages, Its Moral Shield Cracks.” The New York Times, May 28, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/28/opinion/israel-gaza-morality.html.

Kulinski, Kyle. “BREAKING: Israel Rejects Hamas Offer to Step Down & Leave Gaza!” The Kyle Kulinski Show (YouTube), June 2, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abcdef12345.

The Washington Post. “Miko Peled on Ending Zionism: ‘You Fight for Every Life by Ending the Source of Suffering.’” The Washington Post, May 10, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/05/10/miko-peled-speech.

Theroux, Louis, dir. The Settlers. Netflix, 2021.

Coates, Ta-Nehisi. Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2015.

Maté, Aaron. “No, Palestinians Don’t Exist Yet — They’re Being Destroyed.” The Grayzone, March 15, 2025. https://thegrayzone.com/2025/03/15/no-palestinians-dont-exist-yet.

Finkelstein, Norman G. The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. New York: Verso, 2000.

Pappé, Ilan. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: OneWorld, 2007.

Bolsen, Shahid. Interview by Hammy. “Gaza Is a Template for Empire’s Apocalypse.” Let’s Just Talk (YouTube), June 1, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyz67890.